Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Senior faculty renewal at research universities: Implications for academic policy development

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This descriptive study outlines the current state of academic policy development at research universities in four critical areas: (a) the academic labor market, (b) the academic reward structure, (c) faculty seniority and retirement, and (d) institutional research and planning. The survey respondents were coordinators and directors of faculty development programs and selected academic affairs administrators representing major research universities across the United States. The findings confirm the need for research universities to develop more flexible academic personnel policies in support of senior faculty development and renewal. Additional findings show that a majority of research universities have initiated policies to increase the supply of a new and more diverse faculty by increasing retention and recruitment efforts. Also, the survey results point to unprecedented changes in institutional policies that significantly affect the academic reward structures at an increasing number of research universities particularly with regard to the appropriate mix of the two central roles of faculty—teaching and research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R. E. (1990). The advantages and risks of entrepreneurship.Academe, 76 (5), 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association of University Professors. (1993). The annual report on the economic status of the profession, 1992–93.Academe, 79 (2).

  • Armour, R. A., Fuhrmann, B. S., & Wergin, J. F. (1990). Senior faculty career attitudes: Implications for faculty development.To Improve the Academy, 9, 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, J. E. (1988). “Uncapping” in higher education: A primer.Educational Gerontology, 14, 481–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, J. E. (1991, November).Are new knowledge and old faculty mutually exclusive? Paper presented at the 44th annual meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, San Francisco.

  • Bland, C. J., & Schmitz, C. C. (1990). An overview of research on faculty and institutional vitality. In J. S. Schuster, D. W. Wheeler, & Associates,Enhancing faculty careers (pp. 41–62). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boice, R. (1992).The new faculty member. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, C. B. (1990, November, 21). The “lost generation” of scholars can help colleges avoid the looming faculty shortage.Chronicle of Higher Education, B1–B2.

  • Boyer, E. L. (1990).Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braskamp, L. A., & Ory, J. C. (1994).Assessing faculty work: Enhancing individual and institutional performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (1987).A classification of institutions of higher education. Princeton, NJ: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. A. (1993).Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chronister, J. L. (1990). Designing options for early retirement. In J. H. Schuster, D. W. Wheeler, & Associates,Enhancing faculty careers (pp. 139–164). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. M., & Corcoran, M. (1989). Faculty renewal and change. In G. G. Lozier & M. J. Dooris (Eds.),New directions for institutional research: Managing faculty resources, No. 63 (pp. 19–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craver, C. B. (1990). Implications of the elimination of mandatory retirement for professors.Journal of College and University Law, 16(3), 343–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, A. L. (1990). Meeting the challenge of an aging professoriate: An opportunity for leadership.To Improve the Academy, 9, 231–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, A. L. (1995a). Faculty development programs at research universities: Implications for senior faculty renewal.To Improve the Academy, 14.

  • Crawley, A. L. (1995b). Senior faculty and the end to mandatory retirement: Uncovering age-bias in academe.Journal of Staff, Program and Organization Development, 13(1), 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Khawas, E. (1991). Senior faculty in academe: Active, committed to the teaching role.Research Briefs, 2(5).

  • Farmer, D. W. (1993). Designing a reward system to promote the career development of senior faculty. In M. J. Finkelstein & M. W. LaCelle-Peterson (Eds.),New directions for teaching and learning: Developing senior faculty as teachers, No. 55 (pp. 43–54). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, M. J., & Jemmott, N. D. (1993). The senior faculty: Higher education's plentiful yet largely untapped resource. In M. J. Finkelstein & M. W. LaCelle-Peterson (Eds.),New directions for teaching and learning: Developing senior faculty as teachers, No. 55 (pp. 95–98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furniss, W. (1981).Reshaping faculty careers. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, A. H. (1993). Marking the end of mandatory retirement.Academe, 9(3), 88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gainen, J., & Boice, R. (Eds.). (1993).New directions for teaching and learning: Building a diverse faculty. No. 53. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, L. K., & Winfield-Laird, I. (1984). Implications of an aging faculty for the quality of higher education. In C. M. Mehrotra (Ed.),New directions for teaching and learning: Teaching and aging, No. 19 (pp. 5–28). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, R. G. (1993). On the way to the professoriate: The dissertation. In L. Richlin (Ed.),New directions for teaching and learning: Preparing faculty for the new conceptions of scholarship, No. 54 (pp. 47–56). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, P. B., & Morgan, H. P. (1991).Ending mandatory retirement for tenured faculty: The consequences for higher education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, W. K., & Simpson, R. D. (1993). Redefining the role of senior faculty at a research university. In M. J. Finkelstein & M. W. LaCelle-Peterson (Eds.),New directions for teaching and learning: Developing senior faculty as teachers, No. 55 (pp. 69–79). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastenbaum, R., & Schulte, C. (1988, March).How do presidents of american colleges and universities respond to the prospect of professors who cannot be forced to retire? Paper presented at the 14th annual meeting of the Association for Gerontology in Higher Education, Chicago, IL.

  • Kastenbaum, R., & Schulte, C. (1989). On the home front: How do AGHE-member institutions utilize their gerontology programs for age-relevant planning and decision-making?Educational Gerontology, 15, 267–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. A. (1989). Academic personnel policies and practices: Managing the process. In G. G. Lozier & M. J. Dooris (Eds.),New directions for institutional research: Managing faculty resources, No. 63 (pp. 3–18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, A., & Associates (1989).Shaping higher education's future: Demographic realities and opportunities, 1990–2000. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Licata, C. M. (1986).Post-tenure faculty evaluation: Threat or opportunity?: ASHE-ERIC higher education report, No 1. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozier, G. G., & Dooris, M. J. (1991).Faculty retirement projections beyond 1994. Boulder, CO: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundy, K. L., & Warme, B. D. (1990). Gender and career trajectory: The case of part-time faculty.Studies in Higher Education, 15, 202–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. I. (1987).Evaluating faculty for promotion and tenure. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Educational Statistics. (1990).1988 National survey of postsecondary faculty. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, E., & Finkelstein, M. (1993). The senior faculty: A portrait and literature review. In M. J. Finkelstein & M. W. LaCelle-Peterson (Eds.),New directions for teaching and learning: Developing senior faculty as teachers, No. 55 (pp. 7–21). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J. H. (1990a). The need for fresh approaches to faculty renewal. In J. H. Schuster, D. W. Wheeler, & Associates,Enhancing faculty careers (pp. 1–19). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J. H. (1990b). Faculty issues in the 1990s: New realities, new opportunities. In L. W. Jones & F. A. Nowotny (Eds.),New directions for higher education: An agenda for a new decade, No. 70 (pp. 33–41). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J. H. (1993). Preparing the next generation of faculty. In L. Richlin (Ed.),New directions for teaching and learning: Preparing faculty for new conceptions of scholarship, No. 54 (pp. 27–38). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seldin, P. (1985).Changing practices in faculty evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, M. M., & Karnes, J. K. (1988).Perceived expectations of an early retirement incentive program: met or unmet? Oxford, Ohio: Scripps Foundation Gerontological Center, University of Miami.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherr, L. A., & Teeter, D. J. (Eds.). (1991).New directions for institutional research: Total quality management in higher education, No. 71. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, G. (1989). Projections of the population of the United States, by age, sex, and race: 1988 to 2080.Current population reports, population estimates and projections. (Series P-25, No. 1018). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesson, M., & Johnson, S. (1991). Post-tenure review and faculty revitalization.Academe, 77(3), 53–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education. (1992).Bringing into focus the factors affecting faculty supply and demand. Boulder, CO: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willner, J. D. (1990).Uncapping mandatory retirement in public, four-year colleges and universities. Washington, DC: Department of Education, George Washington University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunsch, M. A. (Ed.) (1994).New directions for teaching and learning: Mentoring revisited: Making an impact on individuals and institutions, No. 57. San Franscisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Arthur L. Crawley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Arthur (Art) L. Crawley has an Ed.D. in Adult Education from the University of Georgia. He is an adult educator and counselor with over two decades of teaching and administrative experience in higher education. His area of special interest is faculty career development, particularly as it relate to the needs of mid- and late-career faculty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crawley, A.L. Senior faculty renewal at research universities: Implications for academic policy development. Innov High Educ 20, 71–94 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01189641

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01189641

Keywords

Search

Navigation