Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Selection index: economic weights for maximum simultaneous genetic gain

  • Originals
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Selection indices that maximize the correlation between an individual organism's index score and its breeding value frequently require a priori known “economic” weights before the optimum phenotypic weights can be estimated. The long generation intervals and economic uncertainty that surround forest tree breeding can make the choice of weights arbitrary. In this paper an algorithm is introduced for finding “economic” weights that will ensure maximum simultaneous progress in all index traits. At the outset the traits are assumed to be of equal preference. The solutions are functions of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a quadratic form of the additive genetic and phenotypic covariance matrices. Examples of applications in tree breeding emphasize the practical aspects of the method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker RJ (1986) Selection indices in plant breeding. CRC Press, Boca Raton/FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Binet FE (1965) On the construction of an index for indirect selection. Biometrics 21:291–299

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgwater FE, Stonecypher RW (1979) Index selection for volume and straigthness in a loblolly pine population. Starkville/MA, pp 132–139

  • Bridgwater FE, Talbert JT, Jahromi S (1983) Index selection for increased dry weight in a young loblolly pine population. Silvae Genet 32:157–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Buijtenen HP van (1969) Controlling wood properties by forest management. Tappi 52:257–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Chollet F, Roman-Amat B (1987) Determination of economic coefficients for multi-trait selection on maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait). In: Proc Conf Breed Theory/Progeny Testing/ Seed Orchards, Oct. 13–17, 1986. Williamsburg/VA. IUFRO, North Carolina State University, pp 567–590

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotterill PP (1985) On index selection. II. Simple indices which require no genetic parameters or special expertise to construct. Silvae Genet 34:64–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotterill PP, James JW (1981) Optimising two-stage independent culling selection in tree and animal breeding. Theor Appl Genet 59:67–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham EP, Moen RA, Gjedrem T (1970) Restriction of selection indices. Biometrics 26:67–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dey DK, Srinivasan C (1985) Estimation of a covariance matrix under Stein's loss. Ann Stat 13:1581–1591

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 2nd edn. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman JH (1989) Regularized discriminant analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 84:165–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffing B (1969) Selection in reference to biological groups. IV. Application of selection index theory. Aust J Biol Sci 22:131–142

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris DL (1964) Expected and predicted progress from index selection involving estimates of population parameters. Biometrics 20:46–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Harville DA (1975) Index selection with proportionality constraints. Biometrics 31:223–225

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes JF, Hill WG (1980) A reparameterization of a genetic selection index to locate its sampling properties. Biometrics 36:237–248

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hazel LN (1943) The genetic basis for constructing selection indices. Genetics 28:476–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazel LN, Lush JL (1942) The efficiencies of three methods of selection. J Hered 33:393–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill WG (1984) On selection among groups with heterogeneous variance. Anim Prod 39:473–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Itoh Y, Yamada Y (1988a) Selection indices for desired relative genetic gains with inequality constraints. Theor Appl Genet 75:731–735

    Google Scholar 

  • Itoh Y, Yamada Y (1988 b) Linear selection indices for non-linear profit functions. Theor Appl Genet 75:553–560

    Google Scholar 

  • James M (1985) Classification algorithms. William Collins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempthorne O (1957) An introduction to genetic statistics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempthorne O, Nordskog AW (1959) Restricted selection indices. Biometrics 15:10–19

    Google Scholar 

  • King JN, Yeh FC, Heaman JCH, Dancik BP (1988) Selection of wood density and diameter in controlled crosses of coastal Douglas-fir. Silvae Genet 37:152–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin CY (1978) Index selection for genetic improvement of quantitative characters. Theor Appl Genet 52:49–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Lush JL (1947) Family merit and individual merit as basis for selection. Am Nat 81:241–261, 362–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnussen S, Yeatman CW (1987) Four years' height growth of 25 jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) families in an accelerated nursery trial. In: Demeritt ME J (ed) Proc 30th NE Forest Tree Improv Conf, Orono, Maine, July 22–24, 1986. School of Forest Research, University of Maine, pp 47–64

  • Mather DE, Gunsett FC, Allen OB, Kannenberg LW (1988) Estimation of phenotypic selection differentials for predicting genetic responses to ratio-based selection. Genome 30:838–843

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muller P, Zeddies J (1988) Economic valuation of varieties and breeding objectives. Plant Breed 100:59–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Namkoong G (1976) A multiple-index selection strategy. Silvae Genet 25:199–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Namkoong G, Barefoot AC, Hitchings RG (1969) Evaluating control of wood quality through breeding. Tappi 52:1935–1938

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne R (1957) The use of sire and dam family averages in increasing the efficiency of selective breeding under a hierarchial mating system. Heredity 11:93–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Sales J, Hill WG (1976) Effects of sampling errors on efficiency of selection indices. Anim Prod 22:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle S (1982) Matrix algebra useful for statistics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith HF (1936) A discriminant function for plant selection. Ann Eugen 7:240–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith WB, Pfaffenberger RC (1970) Selection index estimation from partial multivariate normal data. Biometrics 26:625–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Tai GCC (1977) Index selection with desired gains. Crop Sci 17:182–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallis GM (1962) A selection index for optimum genotype. Biometrics 18:120–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallis GM (1968) Selection for an optimum growth curve. Biometrics 24:169–177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner HN, Young SSY (1969) Quantitative genetics in sheep breeding. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkens J (1987) Review of the significance of variations in wood structure in the utilisation ofPinus radiata. Aust For Res 17:215–232

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Forestry Canada, Petawawa National Forestry Institute, P.O. Box 2000, KOJ 1JO, Chalk River., Ontario, Canada

    S. Magnussen

Authors
  1. S. Magnussen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Communicated by A. R. Hallauer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magnussen, S. Selection index: economic weights for maximum simultaneous genetic gain. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 79, 289–293 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01186069

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01186069

Key words

Search

Navigation