Skip to main content
Log in

Generalization of feedback about performance

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of success and failure on interpretation of ambiguous feedback was examined under conditions in which the ambiguous feedback was on a task that was either similar or dissimilar to the one at which subjects succeeded or failed. Subjects who received success feedback were more likely than controls or failure subjects to interpret ambiguous feedback as indicating success. Failure subjects were less likely than controls to interpret the feedback as indicating success. Subjects who performed on a task similar to the original training were more likely to generalize on the basis of their previous experience than were those who performed on a dissimilar task. There was greater generalization to the dissimilar task on the part of failure subjects than success subjects. These results are interpreted in terms of previous findings on success and failure. Analogies between the results of failure subjects and reactive depression were examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference Note

  • Underwood, B., & Froming, W. J.The mood survey: A personality measure of happy and sad moods. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1977.

References

  • Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M., & Teasdale, J. D. Learned helplessness in humans. Critique and reformulation.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1978,87(1), 49–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. W. Motivated determinants of risk-taking behavior.Psychological Review 1954,64 359–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. The relationship of expectation of success to reported probability, task structure, and achievement-related motivation.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1963,66 231–238.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. Change in confidence following success or failure as a predictor of subsequent performance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1968,9 38, 46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jessor, R. The generalization of expectancies.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1954,49 196–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., Ebbesen, E., & Zeiss, A. Selective attention to the self: Situational and dispositional determinants.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1973,27 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. E., & Craighead, W. E. Selective recall of positive and negative feedback, self-control behaviors, and depression.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1977,86 379–388.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P.Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, B. (Ed.).Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, New Jersey: General Learning Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wortman, C. B., & Brehm, J. W. Responses to uncontrollable outcomes: An integration of reactance theory and the learned helplessness model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8). New York: Academic Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moore, B., Underwood, B., Heberlein, P. et al. Generalization of feedback about performance. Cogn Ther Res 3, 371–380 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01184452

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01184452

Keywords

Navigation