Abstract
Bandura discusses how the traditional disease model, explicitly rejected by proponents of behavior modification, has been unwittingly endorsed in several different ways. The dichotomization of clinical and nonclinical populations, the global assessment of therapy outcome, and the methods of treatment delivery all embrace the traditional approach toward deviant behavior. Bandura illustrates how the notion of “analogue research” implies an adherence to the disease model. Analogue research ordinarily is viewed as a distinct category of research secondary to investigations with clinical populations in treatment settings. Yet, controlled research has several unique advantages, well illustrated by Bandura, and is central to developing effective therapy techniques. The present paper uses Bandura's position as a point of departure to elaborate the nature of so-called analogue research. The problems seemingly peculiar to analogue research are considered to characterize all experimental research. To criticize analogue studies in behavior modification is to fail to appreciate the purposes of experimental research in general. Moreover, laboratory investigation of a particular phenomenon does not entail any inherent restrictions on the external validity of the findings. External validity, or the generalizability of the results, is always an empirical question.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review 1977,84 191–215.
Bandura, A. On paradigms and recycled ideologies.Cognitive Therapy and Research 1978,2 79–103.
Bernstein, D. A., & Paul, G. L. Some comments on therapy analogue research with small animal “phobias.”Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 1971,2 225–237.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research and teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1963.
Eysenck, H. J. Learning theory and behaviour therapy.Journal of Mental Science 1959,105 61–75.
Kazdin, A. E. Evaluating the generality of findings in analogue therapy research.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, in press.
Kazdin, A. E., & Wilson, G. T.Evaluation of behavior therapy: Issues, evidence, and research strategies. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1978.
Krasner, L. Behavior therapy. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.),Annual review of psychology (Vol. 22). Palo Alto, Calif.: Annual Reviews, 1971.
Luborsky, L., Singer, B., & Luborsky, L. Comparative studies of psychotherapies: Is it true that “everyone has won and all must have prizes”?Archives of General Psychiatry 1975,32 995–1008.
Marks, I. M. Behavioral treatments of phobic and obsessive-compulsive disorders: A critical appraisal. In M. Hersen, R. M. Eisler, & P. M. Miller (Eds.),Progress in behavior modification (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press, 1975.
Orne, M. T. On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications.American Psychologist 1962,17 776–783.
Paul, G. L.Insight vs. desensitization in psychotherapy: An experiment in anxiety reduction. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1966.
Sloane, R. B., Staples, F. R., Cristol, A. H., Yorkston, N. J., & Whipple, K.Psychotherapy versus behavior therapy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1975.
Ullmann, L. P., & Krasner, L. (Eds.),Case studies in behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1965.
Weber, S. J., & Cook, T. D. Subject effects in laboratory research: An examination of subject roles, demand characteristics, and valid inference.Psychological Bulletin 1972,77 273–295.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kazdin, A.E., Rogers, T. On paradigms and recycled ideologies: Analogue research revisited. Cogn Ther Res 2, 105–117 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01172519
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01172519