Abstract
Incubation experiments were conducted to determine the influence of soil type, soil depth and tillage-straw treatment on the capacity for NO3-N loss under anaerobic incubation. In Experiment 1 with 14 cultivated surface soil samples, there were substantial NO3-N losses in all soils regardless of the total organic carbon content. The total organic carbon content of these soils ranged from 21 to 55 g C kg−1. Experiment 2 showed that the rate of NO3-N loss decreased with depth of soil, but when glucose was added the rate of NO3-N loss increased markedly and all of the added NO3-N disappeared within less than a week. In Experiment 3, the soil under zero tillage where straw was retained gave slightly higher rate of NO3-N loss than the soil from conventional tillage treatment.
References
Aulakh MS and Rennie DA (1987) Can J Soil Sci 67: 825–834
Aulakh MS, Rennie DA and Paul EA (1983a) Plant Soil 75: 15–27
Aulakh MS, Rennie DA and Paul EA (1983b) Can J Soil Sci 63: 593–605
Aulakh MS, Rennie DA and Paul EA (1984) J Environ Quality 13: 130–136
Bijay-Singh, Ryden JC and Whitehead DC (1988) Soil Biol Biochem 20: 737–741
Burford JR and Bremner JM (1975) Soil Biol Biochem 7: 389–394
Cho CM, Sakdinan L and Chang C (1979) Soil Sci Soc Am J 43: 945–950
Gould WD and McCready RGL (1982) Can J Soil Sci 62: 333–342
Malhi SS (1978) Ph.D. Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Malhi SS, McGill WB and Nyborg M (1990) Soil Biol Biochem (accepted)
Malhi SS and Nyborg M (1979) Soil Biol Biochem 11: 439–441
Malhi SS and Nyborg M (1983) Agron J 75: 71–74
Malhi SS, Nyborg M and Solberg ED (1989) Can J Soil Sci 69: 543–550
Nyborg M, Malhi SS and Solberg ED (1990) Can J Soil Sci 70: 21–31
Technicon (1973) Technicon Industrial Systems, Tarrytown, NY, USA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
(Scientific Paper No. 628)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malhi, S.S., Nyborg, M. & Solberg, E.D. Potential for nitrate—N loss in central Alberta soils. Fertilizer Research 25, 175–178 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01161397
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01161397