Skip to main content
Log in

Stochastic scheduling of parallel queues with set-up costs

  • Published:
Queueing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the problem of allocating a single server to a system of queues with Poisson arrivals. Each queue represents a class of jobs and possesses a holding cost rate, general service distribution, and a set-up cost. The objective is to minimize the expected cost due to the waiting of jobs and the switching of the server. A set-up cost is required to effect an instantaneous switch from one queue to another. We partially characterize an optimal policy and provide a simple heuristic scheduling policy. The heuristic's performance is evaluated in the cases of two and three queues by comparison with a numerically obtained optimal policy. Simulation results are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of our heuristic over a wide range of problem instances with four queues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.S. Baras, D.J. Ma and A.M. Makowski,K competing queues with geometric service requirements and linear costs: theμc rule is always optimal, Syst. Control Lett. 6 (1985) 173–180.

    Google Scholar 

  2. O.J. Boxma, H. Levy and J.A. Weststrate, Efficient visit frequencies for polling tables: Minimization of waiting cost, Queueing Systems 9 (1991) 133–162.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Buyukkoc, P. Varaiya and J. Walrand, The-rule revisited, Adv. Appl. Prob. 17 (1985) 237–238.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D.R. Cox and W.L. Smith,Queues (Methuen, London, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M.A.H. Dempster, J.K. Lenstra and A.M.G. Rinnooy Kan,Deterministic and Stochastic Scheduling (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. Duenyas and M.P. Van Oyen, Heuristic scheduling of parallel heterogeneous queues with setups, Technical Report 92-60, Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.C. Gittins,Multi-armed Bandit Allocation Indices (Wiley, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Gupta, Y. Gerchak and J.A. Buzacott, On optimal priority rules for queues with switchover costs, Working Paper, Department of Management Sciences, University of Waterloo (1987).

  9. R.W. Hall,Zero Inventories (Irwin, Homewood, IL 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.M. Harrison, A priority queue with discounted linear costs, Oper. Res. 23 (1975) 260–269.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.M. Harrison, Dynamic scheduling of a multiclass queue: Discount optimality, Oper. Res. 23 (1975) 270–282.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Hofri and K.W. Ross, On the optimal control of two queues with server set-up times and its analysis, SIAM J. Comp. 16 (1987) 399–420.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G.P. Klimov, Time sharing service systems I, Theory of Prob. and Its Appl. 19 (1974) 532–551.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G.P. Klimov, Time sharing service systems II, Theory of Prob. and Its Appl. 23 (1978) 314–321.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Koole, Assigning a single server to inhomogeneous queues with switching costs, Technical Report, CWI, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  16. T.L. Lai and Z. Ying, Open bandit processes and optimal scheduling of queueing networks, Adv. Appl. Prob. 20 (1988) 447–472.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Levy and M. Sidi, Polling systems: applications, modelling, and optimization, IEEE Trans. Commun. 38 (1990) 1750–1760.

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. Levy, M. Sidi and O.J. Boxma, Dominance relations in polling systems, Queueing Systems 6 (1990) 155–172.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Z. Liu, P. Nain and D. Towsley, On optimal polling policies, Queueing Systems 11 (1992) 59–84.

    Google Scholar 

  20. I. Meilijson and U. Yechiali, On optimal right-of-way policies at a single-server station when insertion of idle times is permitted, Stoch. Processes Appl. 6 (1977) 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Nain, Interchange arguments for classical scheduling problems in queues, Syst. Control Lett. 12 (1989) 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. Nain, P. Tsoucas and J. Walrand, Interchange arguments in stochastic scheduling, J. Appl. Prob. 27 (1989) 815–826.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Rajan and R. Agrawal, Optimal server allocation in homogeneous queueing systems with switching costs, preprint, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  24. M.I. Reiman and L.M. Wein, Dynamic scheduling of a two-class queue with setups Technical Report, Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MA (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Takagi, Priority queues with set-up times, Oper. Res. 38 (1990) 667–677.

    Google Scholar 

  26. M.P. Van Oyen, Optimal stochastic scheduling of queueing networks: Switching costs and partial information, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  27. M.P. Van Oyen, D.G. Pandelis and D. Teneketzis, Optimality of index policies for stochastic scheduling with switching penalties, J. Appl. Prob. 29 (1992) 957–966.

    Google Scholar 

  28. M.P. Van Oyen and D. Teneketzis, Optimal stochastic scheduling of forest networks with switching penalties, Adv. Appl. Prob. 26 (1994) 474–497.

    Google Scholar 

  29. P. Varaiya, J. Walrand and C. Buyukkoc, Extensions of the multi-armed bandit problem, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control AC-30 (1985) 426–439.

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. Walrand,An Introduction to Queueing Networks (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duenyas, I., Van Oyen, M.P. Stochastic scheduling of parallel queues with set-up costs. Queueing Syst 19, 421–444 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01151932

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01151932

Keywords

Navigation