Summary
There is a vast amount of untapped spatial information in scalp- recorded EEGs. Measuring this information requires use of many electrodes and application of spatial signal enhancing procedures to reduce blur distortion due to transmission through the skull and other tissues. Recordings with 124 electrodes are now routinely made, and spatial signal enhancing techniques have been developed. The most advanced of these techniques uses information from a subject's MRI to correct blur distortion, in effect providing a measure of the actual cortical potential distribution. Examples of these procedures are presented, including a validation from subdural recordings in an epileptic patient. Examples of equivalent dipole modeling of the somatosensory evoked potential are also presented in which two adjacent fingers are clearly separated. These results demonstrate that EEGs can provide images of superficial cortical electrical activity with spatial detail approaching that of O15 PET scans. Additionally, equivalent dipole modeling with EEGs appears to have the same degree of spatial resolution as that reported for MEGs. Considering that EEG technology costs ten to fifty times less than other brain imaging modalities, that it is completely harmless, and that recordings can be made in naturalistic settings for extended periods of time, a greater investment in advancing EEG technology seems very desirable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basar, E. (Ed.). Dynamics of Sensory and Cognitive Processing by the Brain. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1989.
Cohen, D., Cuffin, B.N., Yunokuchi, K., Maniewski, R., Purcell, C., Cosgrove, G.R., Ives, J., Kennedy, J.G. and Schomer, D.L. MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain. Ann. Neurol., 1990, 28: 811–817.
Duffy F.M. (Ed.). Topographic Mapping of Brain Electrical Activity. Buttersworths, Boston, 1986.
Fender, D.H. Source localization of brain electrical activity. In: A.S. Gevins and A. Remond (Eds.), Handbook of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology: Vol.1, Methods of Analysis of Brain Electrical and Magnetic Signals. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987: 355–403.
Foley, J.D., van Dam, A., Feiner, S.K. and Hughes, J.F. Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice, 2nd Ed. Addison-Wesley, New York, 1990.
Freeman, W.J. Use of spatial deconvolution to compensate for distortion of EEG by volume conduction. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engr., 1980, 27: 421–429.
Gevins, A.S. Application of pattern recognition to brain electrical potentials. IEEE Trans. Pattern Ana. Mach. Intell., 1980, 12: 38
Gevins, A. Dynamic functional topography of cognitive tasks. Brain Topography, 1989, 2: 37–56.
Gevins, A.S. Dynamic patterns in multiple lead data. In: J.W. Rohrbaugh, R. Parasuraman and R. Johnson, Jr. (Eds.), Event-Related Brain Potentials: Basic Issues and Applications. Oxford University Press, New York, 1990: 44–56.
Gevins, A.S. and Bressler, S.L. Functional topography of the human brain. In: G. Pfurtscheller and F.H. Lopes da Silva (Eds.), Functional Brain Imaging. Hans Huber Publishers, Bern, 1988: 99–116.
Gevins, A.S. and Morgan, N.H. Applications of neural-network (NN) signal processing in brain research. IEEE ASSP Trans., 1988, 7: 1152–1161.
Gevins, A.S. and Remond, A. (Eds.). Methods of Analysis of Brain Electrical and Magnetic Signals. Handbook of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol.1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987.
Gevins, A.S., Bressler, S.L., Morgan, N.H., Cutillo, B.A., White, R.M., Greer, D.S. and Illes, J. Event-related covariances during a bimanual visuomotor task. I. Methods and analysis of stimulus- and response-locked data. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1989, 74: 58–75.
Gevins, A.S., Doyle, J.C., Cutillo, B.A., Schaffer, R.E., Tannehill, R.S., Ghannam, J.H., Gilcrease, V.A. and Yeager, C.L. Electrical potentials in human brain during cognition: New method reveals dynamic patterns of correlation. Science, 1981, 213: 918–922.
Gevins, A., Brickett, P., Costales, B., Le, J., Reutter, B. Beyond topographic mapping: Towards functional-anatomical imaging with 124-channel EEGs and 3-D MRIs. Brain Topography, 1990, 3: 53–64.
Heffernan, P.B. and Robb, R.A. A new method for shaded surface display of biological and medical images. IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, 1985, 4: 26–38.
Hill, C.D., Kearfott, R.B and Sidman, R.D. The inverse problem of electroencephalography using an imaging technique for simulating cortical surface data. In: R. Vichnevetsky, P. Borne, J. Vignes (Eds)., Proc. 12th IMACS World Cong., Vol. 3, 1988: 735–738.
Hjorth, B. An on-line transformation of EEG scalp potentials into orthogonal source derivations Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1975, 39: 526–530.
Jack, C.R., Marsh, W.R., Hirschorn, K.A., Sharbrough, F.W., Cascino, G.D., Karwoski, R.A. and Robb, R.A. EEG scalp electrode projection onto three-dimensional surface rendered images of the brain. Radiology, 1990, 176: 413–418.
Jasper, H.H. The ten-twenty electrode system of the international federation. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1958, 10: 371–375.
John, E.R. Neurometrics: Clinical Applications of Quantitative Electrophysiology. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1977.
Le, J. and Gevins, A.S. Laplacian derivation of scalp-recorded EEGs computed with realistic head model and 3-D spline. In preparation, a.
Le, J. and Gevins, A.S. MRI-based finite element model deblurring of scalp-recorded EEGs. In preparation, b.
Lehmann, D. Spatial analysis of EEG and evoked potential data. In: F.H. Duffy (Ed.), Topographic Mapping of Brain Electrical Activity. Buttersworths, Boston, 1986: 23–61.
Levin, D.N., Hu, X., Tan, K.K. and Galhotra, S. Surface of the brain: three-dimensional MR images created with volumerendering. Radiology, 1989, 171: 277–280.
Levoy, M. Display of surfaces from volume data. IEEE Comput. Graph. and Applic., 1988, 8: 29–37.
Lopes da Silva, F.H., Storm van Leeuwen W. and Remond, A. (Eds.). Handbook of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 2: Clinical Applications of Computer Analysis of EEG and other Neurophysiological Signals. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1986.
Lorensen, W. E. and Cline, H. E. Marching cubes: A high resolution 3-D surface construction algorithm. Comput. Graph., 1987, 21: 163–170.
Luders, H., Dinner, D.S., Lesser, R.P. and Morris, H.H. Evoked potentials in cortical localization. J. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1986, 3: 75–84.
Mintun, M.A., Fox, P.T. and Raichle, M. A highly accurate method of localizing regions of neuronal activation in the human brain with positron emission tomography. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1989, 9: 96–103.
Nicholas, P. and Deloche, G. Convolution computer processing of the brain electrical image transmission. Int. J. Bio-Med. Comput., 1976, 7: 143–159.
Nunez, P. Estimation of large scale neocortical source activity with EEG surface Laplacians. Brain Topography, 1989, 2: 141–154.
Okada, Y.C., Tannenbaum, R., Williamson, S.J. and Kaufman, L. Somatopic organization of the human somatosensory cortex revealed by neuromagnetic measurement. Exp. Brain Res. 1984, 56: 197–205.
Pfurtscheller, G. and Lopes da Silva, F.H. (Eds.). Functional Brain Imaging. Hans Huber Publishers, Bern, 1988.
Reutter, B.W. and Gevins, A.S. Algorithms for analysis of Magnetic Resonance Images. In preparation.
Sidman, R.D., Kearfort, R.B., Major, D.J., Hill, D.C., Ford, M.R., Smith, D.B., Lee, L. and Kramer, R. Development and application of mathematical techniques for the noninvasive localization of the sources of scalp-recorded electric potentials. In: J. Eisenfield and D.S. Levine (Eds.), IMACS Trans. Scientific Computing., Vol. 5. J. C. Baltzer AG, Basel, 1989: 133–157.
Wang, J., Cohen, L.M. and Hallett, M. Scalp topography of somatosensory evoked potentials following electrical stimulation of femoral nerve. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1989, 74: 112- 123.
Wood, C.C., Cohen, D., Cuffin, B.N., Yarita, M. and Allison, T. Electrical sources in human somatosensory cortex: Identification by combined magnetic and potential recordings. Science, 1985, 227: 1051–1053.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke, the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institute of Health, the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, the Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine and the Office of Naval Research. Access to neurosurgery patients was kindly provided by the Northern California Comprehensive Epilepsy Center at the University of California (San Francisco), Dr. Kenneth Laxer, Director, and Dr. Nicolas Barbaro, Neurosurgeon. Contributions to the research presented here were also made by our colleagues at EEG Systems Laboratory including Jim Alexander, Brian Cutillo, Judy McLaughlin, and Michael Ward.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gevins, A., Le, J., Brickett, P. et al. Seeing through the skull: Advanced EEGs use MRIs to accurately measure cortical activity from the scalp. Brain Topogr 4, 125–131 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01132769
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01132769