Summary
Four techniques are applied to record EEG signals: bipolar recording, referential recording, common average reference recording and source derivation. For the interpretation of EEG parameter maps knowledge of the properties of the applied recording technique is essential. Bipolar recordings are not discussed in this paper. The application of reference and common average reference recording has the disadvantage of an unknown reference potential. This disadvantage is much larger with the use of source derivation because every electrode signal has its particular reference signal. This must be taken into consideration when coherence estimations are made. With actual EEG records the influence of the reference cannot be determined unambiguously. However, simulation studies enable some essential conclusions. In this paper by means of autoregressive processes EEG signals with given power and coherence properties were simulated and different recording situations using the same data set were reconstructed. The essential result is that computation and mapping of coherences yield the most reliable results when reference recording is used. However, measures to ensure a low reference signal must be taken.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beaumont, J.G., Mayer, A.R. and Rugg, M.D.: Asymmetry in EEG alpha coherence and power: effects of task and sex. Electroencephal. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1978, 45: 393–401.
Beaumont, J.G., Rugg, M.D.: The specificity of intrahemispheric EEG alpha coherence asymmetry related to psychological task. Biol. Psychol., 1979, 9: 237–248.
Box, G., Jenkins, G.: Time series analysis, forecasting and control. Holden-Day, San Francisco, 1970.
Busk, J. and Galbraith, G.C.: EEG correlates of visual motor practice in man. Electroencephal. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1975, 38: 415–422.
Colter, N. and Shaw, J.C.: EEG coherence analysis and field dependence. Biol. Psychol., 1982, 15: 215–228.
Cooper, R., Winter A.,L., Crow, H.J., Walter, W.G.: Comparison of subcortical, cortical and scalp activity using chronically indwelling electrodes in man. Electroencephal. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1965, 18: 217.
Cooper, R., Osselton, J.W., Shaw, J.C.: EEG Technology. Third Edition. Butterworths, London, 1980.
Fein, G., Raz, J., Brown, F., Merrin, E.: Common reference coherence data are confounded by power and phase effects. Electroencephal. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1988, 69: 581–584.
French, C.Ch. and Beaumont, J.G.: A critical review of EEG coherence studies of hemispheric function. Int. J. of Psychophysiology, 1984, 1: 241–254.
Gasser, T., Verleger, R., Bächer, P., Sroka, L.: Development of the EEG of school-age children and adolescents. I. Analysis of band power. Electroencephal. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1988a, 69: 91–99.
Gasser, T., Jennen-Steinmetz, Ch., Sroka, L., Verleger, R., Mocks, J.: Development of the EEG of school-age children and adolescents. II. Topography. Electroencephal. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1988b, 69: 100–109.
Gevins, A.S.: Analysis of the electromagnetic signals of human brain: milestones, obstacles, and goals. IEEE Trans.Biomed.Eng.; 1984, 31: 833–850.
Gevins, A.S., Morgan, N.H., Bressler, S.L., Cutillo, B.A., White, R.M., Illes, J., Greer, D.S., Doyle, J.C., Zeitlin, G.M.: Human neuroelectric patterns predict performance accuracy. Science, 1987, 235: 580–585.
Goldman, D.: The clinical use of the average reference electrode in monopolar recording. Electroencephal. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1950, 2: 209.
Hjorth, B.: An on-line transformation of EEG scalp potentials into orthogonal source derivations. Electroencephal. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1975, 39: 526–530.
Hjorth, B.: Localization of foci in the scalp field. In.: P. Kellaway and I. Petersen (Eds.), Quantitative Analytic Studies in Epilepsy, Raven Press, New York, 1976: 483–492.
Jenkins, G., Watts, D.: Spectral analysis and its applications. Holden Day, San Francisco, 1968.
Katznelson, R.D.: EEG recording, electrode placement and aspects of generator localization. In: P. Nunez (Ed.), Electric Fields of the Brain, Oxford University Press, New York, 1981: 176–213.
Lehmann, D., Ozaki, H., Pal, I.: Averaging of spectral power and phase via vector diagram best fits without reference electrode or reference channel. Electroencephal. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1986, 64: 350–363.
Lehmann, D.: Spatial analysis of EEG and evoked potential data. In: F.H. Duffy (Ed.), Topographic Mapping of Brain Electrical Activity, Butterworths, Boston, 1986a, 143–168.
Nunez, P.L.: Estimation of large scale neocortical source activity with EEG surface Laplacians. This issue.
Nuwer, M.R.: Quantitative EEG: I. Techniques and problems of frequency analysis and topographic mapping. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 1988, 5(1): 1–43.
Offner, F.F.: The EEG as potential mapping: The value of the average monopolar reference. Electroencephal. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1950, 2: 213.
Ozaki, H., Suzuki, H.: Transverse relationships of the alpha rhythm on the scalp. Electroencephal. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1987, 66: 191–195.
Petsche, H., Rappelsberger, P., Pockberger, H.: Sex differences in the ongoing EEG: probability mapping at rest and during cognitive tasks. In: G. Pfurtscheller, F. Lopes da Silva (Eds.), Functional Brain Imaging, Hans Huber Publishers, Toronto, Bern, Stuttgart, 1988: 161–169.
Pfurtscheller, G.: Event related desynchronization mapping: visualization of cortical activation patterns. In: F.H. Duffy (Ed.), Topographic Mapping of Brain Electrical Activity, Butterworths, Boston, 1986: 99–112.
Rappelsberger, P., Petsche, H.: Probability mapping: power and coherence analyses of cognitive processes. Brain Topography, 1988, 1: 46–54.
Shaw, J.C., O'Connor, K.P. and Ongley, C.O.: The EEG as a measure of cerebral functional organization. Br.J.Psychiatry, 1976, 130: 260–264.
Shaw, J.C., O'Connor, K.P. and Ongley, O.C: EEG coherence as a measure of cerebral functional organization. In: M.A.B. Brazier and H. Petsche (Eds.), Architectonics of the Cerebral Cortex, Raven Press, New York, 1978: 245–256.
Shaw, J.C., Brooks, S., Colter, N., O'Connor, K.P.: A comparison of schizophrenic and neurotic patients using EEG power and coherence spectra. In: J. Gruzelier and P. Flor-Henry (Eds.), Hemispheric Asymmetries of Function in Psychophysiology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1979: 257–284.
Sklar, R.L., Hanley, J. and Simmons, W.W.: An EEG experiment aimed toward identifying dyslexic children. Nature (London), 1972, 240: 414–416.
Thatcher, R.W., Krause, P.J., Hrybyk, M.: Cortico-cortical associations and EEG coherence: a two-compartmental model. Electroencephal. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1986, 64: 123–143.
Thatcher, R.W., Walker, R.A., Giudice, S.: Human cerebral hemispheres develop at different rates and ages. Science, 1987, 236: 1110–1113.
Tucker, D.M., Dawson, S.L., Roth, D.L. and Penland J.G.: Regional changes in EEG power and coherence during cognition: intensive study of two individuals. Behavioral Neuroscience, 1985, 99(3): 564–577.
Tucker, D.M., Roth, D.L. and Bait, T.B.: Functional connections among cortical regions: topography of EEG coherence. Electroencephal. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1986, 63: 242–250.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rappelsberger, P. The reference problem and mapping of coherence: A simulation study. Brain Topogr 2, 63–72 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128844
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128844