Skip to main content
Log in

Homework and domestic work

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

This study assesses two competing theories about the extent to which homework—paid work in the home—helps integrate work and domestic roles for men and women. Contrasting male and female homeworkers with their counterparts working outside the home, it supports some aspects of both the resource and role overload theories, but predominantly the role overload perspective. Homeworkers, especially in the working class, experience less interference between job and family life, but perform more housework and child care. They have no more leisure time nor greater marital satisfaction than those working outside the home, but receive more family assistance with their paid jobs, suggesting that they combine tasks from their “first” and “second shifts.” Working at home does not break down gender roles in domestic life. Despite time saved from commuting, male homeworkers perform no more housework than comparable men working outside the home. Thus, the gender division of unpaid household labor is not simply a matter of resources or spatial logistics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, Sheila andCarol Wolkowitz 1987 Homeworking: Myths and Realities. London: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, Betty 1989 Integrating Work and Family: The Home-Working Family. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary 1976 The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belville, Catherine 1935 The Commercialization of the Home through Industrial Home Work. Bulletin no. 135, Women's Bureau, U.S. Department of Labor. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beneria, Lourdes andMartha Roldan 1987 The Crossroads of Class and Gender: Industrial Homework, Subcontracting, and Household Dynamics in Mexico City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, Sue Porter 1989 “Women, work and the family economy: Industrial homework in Rhode Island in 1934.” In Eileen Boris and Cynthia Daniels (eds.), Homework: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on Paid Labor at Home: 53–74. Urbana: Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, Richard A. 1980 “The new home economics: An agenda for sociological research.” In Sarah F. Berk (ed.), Women and Household Labor: 113–148. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berheide, Catherine 1984 “Women's work in the home: Seems like old times.” In Beth B. Hess and Harvin B. Sussman (eds.), Women and the Family: Two Decades of Change: 37–55. New York: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggart, Nicole Woolsey 1989 Charismatic Capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, Hubert 1972 Social Statistics. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, Philip andPepper Schwartz 1991 “Money and ideology: Their impact on power and the division of household labor.” In Rae Lesser Blumberg (ed.), Gender, Family, and Economy: The Triple Overlap: 261–288. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boris, Eileen 1985 “Regulating industrial homework: The triumph of ‘sacred motherhood.’” Journal of American History 71:745–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boris, Eileen andCynthia Daniels, eds. 1989 Homework: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on Paid Labor at Home. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Kathleen 1988 Women and Home-Based Work: The Unspoken Contract. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, Cynthia 1988 “Clerical home-based work: A case study of work and family.” In Kathleen E. Christensen (ed.), The New Era of Home-Based Work: Directions and Policies: 135–145. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coverman, Shelley andJoseph Shelley 1986 “Change in men's housework and child-care time, 1965–1975,” Journal of Marriage and the Family 48:413–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • duRivage, Virginia andDavid Jacobs 1989 “Home-based work: Labor's choices.” In Eileen Boris and Cynthia Daniels (eds.), Homework: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on Paid Labor at Home: 258–271. Urbana: Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Kelly, M. Patricia andAnna M. Garcia 1989 “Hispanic women and homework: Women in the informal economy of Miami and Los Angeles.” In Eileen Boris and Cynthia Daniels (eds.), Homework: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on Paid Labor at Home: 165–182. Urbana: Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, Janet 1983 Married to the Job. Boston: Unwin Hymer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Gil 1988 “Corporate hiring practices for telecommuting homeworkers.” In Kathleen E. Christensen (ed.), The New Era of Home-Based Work: Directions and Policies: 65–78. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, Heidi 1981 “The family as the locus of gender, class and political struggle: The example of housework.” Signs 6:366–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, Ramona 1989 “A profile of home-based workers.” Human Ecology Forum 16:15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herod, Andrew 1991 “Homework and the fragmentation of space: Challenges for the labor movement.” Geoforum 22: 173–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, Arlie 1989 The Second Shift. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, Francis W. 1986 “Work at home: New findings from the current population survey.” Monthly Labor Review November: 31–35.

  • Iverson, Kristine 1988 “The government's role in regulating home employment.” In Kathleen E. Christensen (ed.), The New Era of Home-Based Work: Directions and Policies: 149–156. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Laura andRobert Johnson 1982 The Seam Allowance: Industrial Home Sewing in Canada. Toronto: Women's Educational Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilborn, Peter 1989 “Playing games with child labor laws: When work fills a child's hours.” New York Times December 10: 1, 46.

  • Kilborn, Peter 1990 “Child labor law violators sought in nationwide raids.” New York Times March 15: A14.

  • Kingston, Jane 1983 “Telecommuting: Its impact on the home.” In Howard Blasbury (ed.), The World of Work: 287–300. Bethesda, MD: World Future Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1988 “Homework: What is it and who does it?” In Kathleen E. Christensen (ed.), The New Era of Home-Based Work: Directions and Policies: 30–48. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1989 “Telecommuting: The trade-offs of home work.” Journal of Communication 39: 19–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, Robert E. andPatricia Grambsch 1987 “Home-Based white collar employment: Lessons from the 1980 Census.” Social Forces 66: 410–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leidner, Robin 1987 “Home work: A study in the interaction of work and family organization.” In Ida Harper Simpson and Richard L. Simpson (eds.), Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 4: High Tech Work: 69–94. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, Beverly 1989 The Invisible Work Force: Transforming Business with Outside and Home-Based Workers. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, M. E., S. Humphries, S. Meis, andW. Scheu 1975 “No exit for wives: Sexual division of labor and the cumulation of household demands.” Review of Canadian Sociology and Anthropology 12: 424–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales, Rebecca 1983 “Cold solder on a hot stove.” In Jan Zimmerman (ed.), The Technological Woman: Interfacing with Tomorrow. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council 1985 Office Work Stations in the Home. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Margaret K. 1988 “Providing family day care: An analysis of home-based work.” Social Problems 35: 78–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilles, Jack 1977 The Telecommunication/Transportation Tradeoff. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1988 “Corporate culture and the homeworker.” In Kathleen E. Christensen (ed.), The New Era of Home-Based Work: Directions and Policies: 126–134. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1989 “Organizational barriers to professional telework.” In Eileen Boris and Cynthia Daniels (eds.), Homework: Historical and Contemporary Perspective on Paid Labor at Home: 215–230. Urbana: Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott andR. F. Bales 1955 Family, Socialization and Process. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, Shelley andBelinda Westover 1989 A Hidden Workforce: Homeworkers in England, 1850–1985. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, Joseph 1985 Working Wives/Working Husbands. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, Alejandro andSaskia Sassen-Koob 1987 “Making it underground: Comparative material on the informal sector in western market economies.” American Journal of Sociology 93: 30–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, Joanne H. 1984 “Home teleworking: A study of its pioneers.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 25: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Robert P. andGraham L. Staines 1979 The 1977 Quality of Employment Survey. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsower, Reagan Mays 1985 Telecommuting: The Organizational and Behavioral Effects of Working at Home. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Catherine E. 1987 “The division of labor at home.” Social Forces 65: 816–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, Hilary 1989 “The demand for homework: Evidence from the U.S. Census.” In Eileen Boris and Cynthia Daniels (eds.), Homework: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on Paid Labor at Home: 103–129. Urbana: Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff, Natalie J. 1980 Between Money and Love: The Dialectics of Women's Home and Market Work. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitze, Glenna 1988 “Women's employment and family relations: A review.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 50: 595–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Linda andAlexis Walker 1989 “Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work, and parenthcod.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 51: 845–871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, Alvin 1980 The Third Wave. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, Charles, Patrick Horan, andE. M. Beck 1980 “The structure of economic segmentation.” American Journal of Sociology 85: 1095–1116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voydanoff, Patricia 1988 “Work role characteristics, family structure demands, and work/family conflict.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 50: 749–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winship, Christopher andRobert D. Mare 1984 “Regression models with ordinal variables.” American Sociological Review 49: 512–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wonnacott, Ronald J. andThomas H. Wonnacott 1970 Econometrics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silver, H. Homework and domestic work. Sociol Forum 8, 181–204 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115489

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115489

Key words

Navigation