Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Beyond dichotomy: Drawing distinctions and embracing differences

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

The recognition of gender as a constituent element of social structure poses a profound challenge to received wisdom and practice in sociology. We review selected aspects of the new scholarship and its fundamental critique of objectivism and dualistic models. Counterchallenges are acknowledged: from institutional and collegial resistance, on the one hand, to an enhanced awareness of the dilemmas posed by diversity and sameness within and between gender categories, on the other hand. From their struggle with these issues, feminist scholars are constructing a sociology that transcends dichotomies, embraces diversity, and links the several levels of social analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, Susan Hardy, Karen Anderson, Myra Dinnerstein, Judy Lensink, andPatricia MacCorquodale 1987 “Trying transformations: Curriculum integration and the problem of resistance.” Signs 12:255–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcoff, Linda 1988 “Cultural feminism versus post-structuralism: The identity crisis in feminist theory.” Signs 13:405–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Behavioral Scientist 1987 Special Issue. “New gender scholarship: Breaking old boundaries.” 31(1).

  • Andersen, Margaret L. 1988 Thinking About Women: Sociological Perspectives on Sex and Gender, 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Margo L. 1988 The American Census: A Social History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannister, Robert C. 1987 Sociology and Scientism: The American Quest for Objectivity. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Brigitte 1988 “Academic feminism and the ‘Left.’” Academic Questions Spring:6–15.

  • Bernard, Jessie 1988 “The inferiority curriculum.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 12:261–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezucha, Robert J. 1985 “Feminist pedagogy as subversive activity.” In Margo Culley and Catherine Portuges (eds.), Gendered Subjects: The Dynamics of Feminist Teaching: 81–95. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, Rae Lesser 1989 Women and the Wealth of Nations: Theory and Research on Gender and Global Development. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, Susan 1986 “The Cartesian masculinization of thought.” Signs 11:439–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bose, Christine 1986 “Devaluing women's work: The undercount of women's employment in 1900 and 1980.” In Roslyn Feldberg and Natalie Sokoloff (eds.), Hidden Aspects of Women's Work: 95–115. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1984 Sex and Advantage: A Comparative Macro-Structural Theory of Sex Stratification. Totowa: NJ: Rowman and Allenheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1988a Feminist Sociology. Itasca, IL: Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafetz, Janet Saltzman 1988b “Reflections of a feminist social theorist.” Paper presented at the 83rd annual meeting of American Sociological Association, Atlanta, GA.

  • Chancer, Lynn S. 1987 “New Bedford, Massachusetts, March 16, 1983–March 22, 1984: The ‘before and after’ of a group rape.” Gender and Society 1:239–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Patricia Hill 1986 “Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought.” Social Problems 33:814–832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Randall, John McCarthy, Marshall Meyer, Pamela Oliver, and Jonathan Turner 1989 “Future organizational trends of the ASA.” Footnotes September:1–5, 9.

  • Connell, R. W. 1985 “Theorizing gender.” Sociology 19:260–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Judith A. andMary Margaret Fonow 1986 “Knowledge and women's interest: Issues of epistemology and methodology in feminist sociological research.” Sociological Inquiry 56:2–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, Rose Laub 1986 “Cognitive structure and the use of social space.” Sociological Forum 1:1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cott, Nancy 1987 The Grounding of Modern Feminism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culley, Margo andCatherine Portuges, eds. 1985 Gendered Subjects: The Dynamics of Feminist Teaching. Boston: Routledge and Kegal Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, Mary Jo 1988 Jane Addams and the men of the Chicago School, 1892–1920. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • deWolf, Peggy L., James K. Skipper, Jr., Judith Steed, andCathryn V. Alpaugh 1986 “Gender roles and women's issues as an area of interest among sociologists.” Sociological Inquiry 56:150–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, Bonnie Thornton 1983 “Race, class, and gender: Prospects for an all-inclusive sisterhood.” Feminist Studies 9:131–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichler, Margit 1988 Nonsexist Research Methods. New York: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enloe, Cynthia 1987 “Feminist thinking about war, militarism, and peace.” In Beth B. Hess and Myra Marx Ferree (eds.), Analyzing Gender: A Handbook of Social Science Perspectives: 526–548. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs 1988 Deceptive Distinctions: Sex, Gender, and the Social Order. New Haven, CA: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber, Harold 1988 “Increasingly, women are becoming veterinarians.” New York Times 21 February: 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausto-Sterling, Anne 1985 Myths of Gender: Biological Theories about Women and Men. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flax, Jane 1987 “Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory.” Signs 12:621–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox-Genovese, Elizabeth 1989 Within the Plantation Household: Black and White Women of the Old South. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, Judith M. andKathy Peiss 1985 “Boundaries, negotiation, consciousness: Reconceptualizing gender relations.” Social Problems 32:317–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony 1986 “The future of sociology.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Sociological Society, New York.

  • Giele, Janet Z. 1989 “Feminism, conservatism, and ‘Deceptive Distinctions.’” Paper presented at the 84th annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco.

  • Gilligan, Carol 1982 In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitlin, Todd 1989 “Postmodernism: Roots and politics.” Dissent Winter:100–108.

  • Grant, Linda, Kathryn B. Ward, andXue Lan Rong 1987 “Is there an association between gender and methods in sociological research?” American Sociological Review 52:856–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haaken, Janice 1988 “Field dependence research: An historical analysis of a psychological construct.” Signs 13:311–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1951 “Women as a minority group.” Social Forces 30:60–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1953 “Marx, Weber, and Pareto on the changing status of women.” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 12:149–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Elaine J. 1988 “One week for women? The structure of inclusion of gender issues in introductory textbooks.” Teaching Sociology 16:431–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Elaine J. and Myra Marx Ferree 1989 “Images of society: Race and gender in sociology textbook illustrations.” Paper presented at the 84th annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco.

  • Haraway, Donna 1988 “Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective.” Feminist Studies 14:575–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra 1986 “The instability of the analytic categories of feminist theory.” Signs 11:645–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkesworth, Mary E. 1989 “Knowers, knowing, known: Feminist theory and claims of truth.” Signs 14:533–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekman, Susan 1987 “The feminization of epistemology: Gender and the social sciences.” Women and Politics 7:65–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, Beth B., andMyra Marx Ferree, eds. 1987 Analysing Gender: A Handbook of Social Science Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, Beth B., andElizabeth W. Markson, eds. 1985 Growing Old in America, 3rd ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Roger 1986 “The knower and the known.” Sociological Forum 1:610–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Bettina 1988 “The status of minorities and women within ASA.” Footnotes May:4,8.

  • Huber, Joan 1986 “Trends in gender stratification, 1970–1985.” Sociological Forum 1:476–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, Anne S. 1986 “Consciousness re-evaluated: Interpretive theory and feminist scholarship.” Sociological Inquiry 56:30–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, Debra 1988 “Feminist thinking and models: Consciousness, language, and agency.” Paper presented at Conference on Qualitative Interaction, University of Windsor, Ontario, Canada.

  • Keller, Evelyn Fox 1982 “Feminism and science.” Signs 7:588–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Hilary Manette 1989 “Marxism, psychoanalysis, and mother nature.” Feminist Studies 15:255–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komarovsky, Mirra 1988 “The new feminist scholarship: Some precursors and polemics.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 50:585–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulis, Stephen 1988 “The representation of women in top ranked sociology departments.” The American Sociologist 19:203–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kully, Hannah 1988 “Theoretical logic in feminist theory.” Paper presented at the 83rd annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Atlanta, GA.

  • Laslett, Barbara forthcoming “Unfeeling knowledge: Emotion and objectivity in the history of sociology. Sociological Forum 5(3).

  • Lengermann, Patricia Madoo andJill Niebrugge-Brantley 1988 “Contemporary feminist theory.” In George Ritzer (ed.), Sociological Theory, 2nd ed.: 400–443. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. 1972 “Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge.” American Journal of Sociology 78:9–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Karen, Stephen Kulis, Leonard Gordon, and Morris Axelrod 1988 “The representation of women in U.S. sociology departments.” Footnotes April:3.

  • Millman, Marcia andRosabeth Moss Kanter, eds. 1975 Another Voice: Feminist Perspectives on Social Life and Social Science. Garden City, NY: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molotch, Harvey 1988 “The restroom and equal opportunity.” Sociological Forum 3:128–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offen, Karen 1988 “Defining feminism: A comparative historical approach.” Signs 14:119–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 “Experimental analysis: A contribution to feminist research.” In Gloria Bowles and Renate Duelli-Klein (eds.), Theories of Women's Studies: 162–191. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1986 “Patriarchal pontifications.” Society 23:23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, Barbara F. 1988 “Bringing the men back in: Sex differentiation and the devaluation of women's work.” Gender and Society 2:58–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risman, Barbara J. 1987 “Intimate relationships from a microstructural perspective: Men who mother.” Gender and Society 1:6–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, Mary 1988 “Sisterhood and domestic service: Race, class, and gender in the mistress-maid relationship.” Humanity and Society 12:318–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Gayle 1975 “The traffic in women: Notes on the political economy of sex.” In Rosemary Reiter (ed.), Toward an Anthropology of Women: 120–157. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiebinger, Londa 1987 “The history and philosophy of women in science: A review essay.” Signs 12:305–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Joan W. 1985 “Gender: A useful category of historical analysis.” Paper presented to the American Historical Society, New York, December.

  • 1988 “Deconstructing equality-versus-difference: Or, the uses of poststructuralist theory for feminism.” Feminist Studies 14:33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 1987 “Restructuring the academy.” 2(2).

  • 1989 Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Martin E. 1987 “The imperfect empiricism of the social sciences.” Sociological Forum 2:331–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, Joey andMary Zimmerman 1989 “Quality and quantity: Reconstructing feminist methodology.” The American Sociologist 20:71–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, Judith andBarrie Thorne 1985 “The missing feminist revolution in sociology.” Social Problems 32:301–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, Marilyn 1987 “An awkward relationship: The case of feminism in anthropology.” Signs 12:276–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabet, Paola 1987 “Imposed reproduction: Maimed sexuality.” Feminist Issues 7:19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, Barrie andZella Lauria 1986 “Sexuality and gender in children's daily worlds.” Social Problems 33:176–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, Ruth, ed. 1989 Feminism and Sociological Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, Candace andDon H. Zimmerman 1987 “Doing gender.” Gender and Society 1:125–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, Jon 1988 “Campus voices right and left.” The Nation 12:644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, Doris Y. 1989 “Revitalizing the American university: A social science renaissance in problemsolving.” Social Problems 36:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Women's Studies Quarterly 1987 “Special feature: Feminist pedagogy.” Fall/Winter.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hess, B.B. Beyond dichotomy: Drawing distinctions and embracing differences. Sociol Forum 5, 75–93 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115138

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115138

Key words

Navigation