Skip to main content
Log in

Rethinking the policy influence of experts: From general characterizations to analysis of variation

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

This paper first surveys the four principal positions in the debate about the policy influence of professional experts — technocracy, extensive mandates, limited mandates, and “servants of power” — and finds none entirely satisfactory. While the limited mandates position is the best general characterization of the policy influence of experts, many instances reveal more extensive influence. The papers argues for shifting the discussion from general characterizations to the systematic analysis of variation in the extent and significance of professional influence. A framework for analyzing this variation is proposed. The framework highlights the importance of depoliticization, the framing of issues as narrowly technical or involving the protection of a central cultural value, political situations that encourage the informal capture of power by professional experts or the delegation of power to experts, and the differing level of legitimacy enjoyed by professional occupations, based on their centrality in social regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aberbach, Joel D., Robert D. Putnam, andBert A. Rockman 1981 Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aberbach, Joel D. andBert A. Rockman 1974 “Clashing beliefs within the executive branch: The Nixon atministrition bureaucracy.” American Political Science Review 70:456–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alford, Robert andRoger Friedland 1985 The Powers of Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, Graham T. 1971 Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little-Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, William andPaul Starr, eds. 1987 The Politics of Numbers. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arney, William Ray andBernard J. Bergen 1984 Medicine and the Management of Living. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, Peter andMorton S. Baratz 1970 Power and Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banfield, Edward 1961 Political Influence. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1974/75 “Consensus and conflict among American leaders.” Public Opinion Quarterly 38:504–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1984 “Determinants of elite policy attitudes.” In B. A. Rockman and R. H. Linden (eds.), Elite Studies and Comparative Studies. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Daniel 1973 The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Basil 1977 Class, Codes and Control, vol. 3. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bledstein, Burton 1976 The Culture of Professionalism. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, N. J. andGerald Dworkin 1976 “IQ, heritability and inequality.” In N. J. Block and Gerald Dworkin (eds.), The IQ Controversy: 410–542. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1981 “Strqtification in the professions: In analyis of academe, science, engineering, medicine, law,(and corporate management.” Unpublished paper, The Huron Institute, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brint, Steven In press Retainers, Merchants, and Priests: A Political Sociology of the Professional Middle Class America. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Brint, Steven andJerome Karabel 1989 The Diverted Dream: Community Colleges and the Promise of Educational Opportunity in America, 1900–1985. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brzezinski, Zbigniew 1970 Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burck, Charles G. 1976 “A group profile of the Fortune 500 chief executive.” Fortune (May):173ff.

  • Carr-Saunders, A. M. andP. A. Wilson 1933 The Professions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Randall 1979 The Credential Society. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremin, Lawrence 1964 The Transformation of the School. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenson, Matthew A. 1971 The Unpolitics of Air Pollution. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, Thomas E. andNorman C. Thomas 1971 “Federal advisory processes: Advice and discontent.” Science 171:771–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, Melvin 1959 Men Who Manage. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domhoff, G. William 1970 The Higher Circles. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, Thomas R. 1978 Understanding Public Policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenreich, John and Barbara Ehrenreich 1977 “The professional-managerial class, I.” Radical America (March–April):7–31.

  • Ellul, Jacques 1964 The Technological Society. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1973 “Professions and the occupational principle.” In Freidson (ed.), Professions and Their Prospects: 19–38. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1986 Professional Powers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, John Kenneth 1967 The New Industrial State. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaventa, John 1980 Power and Powerlessness. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Barry G., ed. 1968 Organizational Careers. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Robert J. 1981 “The Consumer Price Index: Measuring inflation and causing it.” The Public Interest 63:112–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1976 The Dialectic of Ideology and Technology. New York: Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1979 The Future of Intellectuals and the Rise of the New Class. New York: Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1982 “The idiom of legalism in bar politics: Lawyers, McCarthyism and the Civil Rights era.” American Bar Association Research Journal 1982:911–989.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1985 “Knowledge mandates: Collective influence by scientific, normative and syncretic professions.” British Journal of Sociology 36:421–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1987 Beyond Monopoly: Lawyers, State Crises, and Professional Empowerment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, Thomas L. 1984 “Professionalism versus capitalism.” In Thomas L. Haskell (ed.), The Authority of Experts: 180–225. Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, Edward S. 1981 Corporate Control, Corporate Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heydebrand, Wolf V. 1983 “Technocratic corporatism: Toward a theory of occupational and organizational transformation.” In Robert Hall and Robert Quinn (eds.), Organizational Theory and Public Policy: 93–114. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1977 “Political parties and macroeconomic policies.” American Political Science Review 71:467–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1982 “On the demand for economic outcomes: Macroeconomic performance and mass political support in the United States, Great Britain and Germany.” Journal of Politics 44:426–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, Alexander 1984 “Electrons, Keynes, bureaucracy and class.” American Sociological Review 49:165–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgartner, Stephen 1984 “The binary weapons controversy.” In Dorothy Nelkin (ed.), Controversy: The Politics of Technical Decisions: 143–158. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgartner, Stephen andCharles L. Bosk 1988 “The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model.” American Journal of Sociology 94:53–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Albert O. 1988 “How Keynes was spread in America.” Challenge 31:4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, Richard 1955 The Age of Reform. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houdek, Frank G. 1985 The Freedom of Information Act: A Comprehensive Bibliography of Law-Related Materials, 3rd ed. Austin: University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1959 “The study of occupations.” In Robert K. Merton, Leonard Broom, and Leonard S. Cottrell, Jr. (eds.), Sociology Today: 442–458. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1963 “Professions.” Daedalus 92:665–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, Herbert 1988 Silent Revolution: The Transformation of Divorce Law in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevles, Daniel J. 1975 “Scientists, the military, and the control of post-war defense research: The case of the Research Board for National Security, 1944–46:” Technology and Culture 16:20–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger, Henry 1969 American Foreign Policy. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristol, Irving 1972 “About equality.” Commentary 54:41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, Stanford A. 1977 “Scientists, technologists and political power.” In Ina Spiegel-Rosing and Derek de Solla Price (eds.), Science, Technology, and Society: 355–391. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, Sanford A., ed. 1966 Knowledge and Power: Essays on Science and Government. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1977 The Rise of Professionalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1984 “The production of expertise and the constitution of expert power.” In Thomas L. Haskell (ed.), The Authority of Experts: 28–80. Blcomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, Christopher 1977 Haven in a Heartless World: The Family Besieged. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, Edward O. andDavid Knoke 1987 The Organizational State: Social Change in National Policy Domains. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour Martin 1981 Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics, rev. ed. (1960) Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, Theodore 1979 The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic in America, 2d ed. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luker, Kristin 1985 Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, Steven 1974 Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malbin, Michael J. 1980 Unelected Representatives. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, Herbert 1961 One-Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, Allan 1973 “Disputes between experts.” Minerva 11:243–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meynaud, Jean 1969 Technocracy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. Wright 1956 The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollenkopf, John II. 1983 The Contested City. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1965 “The professionalization of reform.” The Public Interest 1:6–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1973 The Politics of a Guaranteed Income. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulkay, Michael 1976 “The mediating role of the scientific elite.” Social Studies of Science 6:445–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1975 “The political impact of technical expertise.” Social Studies of Science 5:35–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1977 “Technology and public policy.” In Ina Spiegel-Rosing and Derek de Solla Price (eds.), Science, Technology, and Society: 392–442. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1982 The Creation Controversy: Science or Scripture. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, Dorothy, ed. 1984 Controversy: The Politics of Technical Decisions, 2nd ed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netzer, Dick 1978 The Subsidized Muse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, David 1977 America by Design. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, David 1985 None of the Above: The Myth of Scholastic Aptitude. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, John F. 1981 “Hierarchy and ecological control in federal budgetary decision-making.” American Journal of Sociology 87:75–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piven, Frances Fox andRichard P. Cloward 1972 Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Relief. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prewitt, Kenneth andWilliam McAllister 1976 “Changes in the American executive elite, 1930–1970.” In H. Eulau and M. M. Czudnowski (eds.), Elite Recruitment in Democratic Politics: 105–132. New York: Sage—John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack, Joel andFrank von Hippel 1974 Advice and Dissent: Scientists in the Political Arena. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. 1977 “Elite transformation in advanced industrial societies: An empirical assessment of the theory of technocracy.” Comparative Political Studies 10:383–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rado, Leslie 1981 “Death redefined: Social and cultural influences on legislation.” Journal of Communications 31:41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravitch, Diane 1983 The Troubled Crusade. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, David J. 1971 The Discovery of the Asylum. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, Stanley andS. Robert Lichter 1982 “Media and business elites: Two classes in conflict?” The Public Interest 69:117–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russett, Bruce M. 1974 “Political perspectives of U.S. Military and business elites.” Armed Forces and Society 1:79–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, Robert H. 1979 “Why no corporatism in the United States?” In Phillipe C. Schmitter and Gerhard Lehmbruch (eds.), Trends in Corporatist Intermediation: 213–230. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schudson, Michael 1972 “Organizing the meritocracy: A history of the college examination boards.” Harvard Educational Review 42:34–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scotch, Richard K. 1984 From Good Will to Civil Rights. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scull, Andrew T. 1979 Museums of Madness. London: Allen-Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shils, Edward A. 1968 “Deference.” In John A. Jackson (ed.), Social Stratification: 104–132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shilts, Randy 1986 And the Band Played On. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda 1985 “Bringing the state back in: Strategies of analysis in current research.” In Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rheschmeyer, and Theda Skocpol (eds.), Bringing the State Back In: 3–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Hedrick 1988 The Power Game. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 The Social Transformation of American Medicine. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1987 “The sociology of official statistics.” In William Alonso and Paul Starr (eds.), The Politics of Numbers: 7–57. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockman, David A. 1986 The Triumph of Politics: Why the Reagan Revolution Failed. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suleiman, Ezra 1978 Elites in French Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, Barry 1976 “Elites in America: A Washington Post-Harvard survey.” The Washington Post (September 26–30).

  • Thomas, George et al. 1987 Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society, and the Individual. New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, Alain 1971 The Post-Industrial Society. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyack, David 1974 The One Best System. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyack, David andElizabeth Hansot 1982 Managers of Virtue. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Useem, Michael andJerome Karabel 1986 “Pathways to corporate management.” American Sociological Review 51:184–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Jack L. 1977 “Setting the agenda for the U. S. Senate: A problem of selection.” British Journal of Political Science 7:423–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, James 1968 The Corporate Ideal in the Liberal State, 1900–1918. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe, Robert 1968 The Search for Order. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Graham K. 1982 “Why is there no corporatism in the United States?” In Gerhard Lehmbruch and Phillipe C. Schmitter, (eds.), Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making: 219–236. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Sandra 1990 “Textbooks: The social selection of educational knowledge.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology, Yale University.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brint, S. Rethinking the policy influence of experts: From general characterizations to analysis of variation. Sociol Forum 5, 361–385 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115092

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115092

Key words

Navigation