Abstract
This paper aims to demonstrate the value of participatory action research (PAR) for advancing scientific knowledge as well as for solving practical problems. The article supports the argument through brief summaries of three PAR cases in industry: Norwegian shipping, Xerox Corporation, and the FAGOR group of the Mondragón cooperatives. While noting the practical gains achieved through PAR, the author concentrates particularly on the advances in substantive knowledge and theory that would have been unlikely to emerge out of more orthodox sociological research. The author suggests finally that wider use of participatory action research can have a stimulating effect upon the future development of sociology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cooper, Robin andRobert S. Kaplan 1988 “Measure costs right: Make the right decision.” Harvard Business Review 66(September–October): 96–103.
Freeman, D. 1983 Margaret Mead and Samoa: The Making and Unmaking of an Anthropological Myte. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Garfield, Sidney andWilliam F. Whyte 1950–51 “The collective bargaining process.” Human Organization 9(2):5–10; 9(3):10–16; 9(4):25–29; 10(1):28–34.
Gardner, Burleigh B. 1946 Human Relations in Industry. Homewood, IL: Richard Irwin.
Greenwood, Davydd J. and José Luis Gonzalez et al. forthcoming Organizational Cultures in Mondragón: A Participatory Action Research Study of Change in the Fagor Cooperative Group.
Inkeles, Alex 1986 “Advances in sociology: A critique.” In Karl W. Deutsch, Andrei S. Markovits, and John Platt (eds.), Advances in the Social Sciences, 1900–1980. Lanhan, MD: University Press of America.
Klingel, Sally andAnn Martin, eds. 1988 A Fighting Chance: New Strategies to Save Jobs and Reduce Costs. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
Lewis, Oscar 1951 Life in a Mexican Village: Tepoztlán Restudied. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Locke, Edwin A. andDavid M. Schweiger 1979 “Participation in decision-making: One more look.” In Barry M. Staw (ed.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 1: 265–339. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Mead, Margaret 1973 Coming of Age in Samoa. (1928) New York: Morrow.
Redfield, Robert 1930 Tepoztlán: A Mexican Village. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rossi, P. H., R. A. Berk, andK. Lenihan 1980 Money, Work and Crime. New York: Academic Press.
Salmen, Lawrence F. 1987 Listen to the People: Participant-Observer Evaluation of Development Projects. New York: Oxford University Press.
Thorsrud, Einar 1977 “Democracy at work: Norwegian experience with non-bureaucratic forms of organization.” Applied Behavioral Science 13:410–421.
Trist, Eric 1981 The Evolution of Socio-Technical Systems: A Conceptual Framework and Action Research Program. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Labour.
Walton, Richard 1988 Innovating to Compete. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Walton, Richard and Michael Gaffney 1989 “Research, action and participation: The merchant shipping case.” American Behavioral Scientist 32(5).
Whyte, William F. 1943 Street Corner Society. Later editions, 1955 and 1981. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Whyte, William F. andDamon Boynton, eds. 1983 Higher Yielding Human Systems for Agriculture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Whyte, William F. andRobert R. Braun 1968 “On language and culture.” In Howard Beckeret al. (eds.), Institutions and the Person: 119–138. Chicago: Aldine.
Whyte William F., Davydd J. Greenwood, and Peter Lazes 1989 “Participatory action research: Through practice to science in social research.” American Behavioral Scientist 32(5).
Whyte, William F. andKathleen King Whyte 1988 Making Mondragón: The Growth and Dynamics of the Worker Cooperative Complex. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whyte, W.F. Advancing scientific knowledge through participatory action research. Sociol Forum 4, 367–385 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115015
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115015