Skip to main content
Log in

The contemporary U.S. women's movement: An empirical example of competition theory

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

We use competition and resource mobilization perspectives to explain the rise of the contemporary U.S. women's movement. Our competition framework proposes that economic and sociodemographic changes since World War II increased competition between women and men in the marketplace. This increased competition provided motivation for the women's movement. We find support for this framework with national quantitative time-series data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambert, Anne-Marie 1985 “The effect of divorce on women's attitude toward feminism.” Sociological Focus 18:265–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, Helen S. 1969 The Woman Doctorate in America. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, Fredrik ed. 1969 Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholet, Elizabeth 1982 “Application of Title VII to jobs in high places.” Harvard Law Review 95:947–1027.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary, Elizabeth Landes, andRobert Michael 1977 “An economic analysis of marital instability.” Journal of Political Economy 85:1141–1187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogue, Donald 1985 The Population of the United States: Historical Trends and Future Projections. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonacich, Edna 1972 “A theory of ethnic antagonism: The split labor market.” American Sociological Review 37:547–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burstein, Paul 1985 Discrimination, Jobs, and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1974 The New Feminist Movement. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1978 “The proliferation of a social movement: Ideology and individual incentives in the contemporary feminist movement.” In Research in Social Movements, Conflict, and Change, Vol. 1:179–196. Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1986 Female Revolt: Women's Movements in World and Historical Perspective. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1987 “In the face of threat: Organized antifeminism in comparative perspective.” Gender and Society 1:33–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1989 “Action and reaction: An integrated, comparative perspective on feminist and antifeminist movements.” In Melvin Kohn (ed.), Cross-National Research in Sociology: 329–350. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, James 1980 “Fertility and female employment: Problems of causal direction.” American Sociological Review 45:167–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, James A. andTom W. Smith 1988 General Social Surveys, 1972–88: Cumulative Codebook. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Kingsley andPietronella van den Oever 1982 “Demographic foundations of new sex roles.” Population and Development Review 8:493–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1981 The Radical Future of Liberal Feminism. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1984 “The patriarchical relations of the Reagan state.” Signs 10:329–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Sara 1978 Personal Politics: The Roots of Women's Liberation in the Civil Rights Movement and the New Left. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, Myra Marx andBeth B. Hess 1985 Controversy and Coalition: The New Feminist Movement. Boston: Twayne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, Myra Marx andFrederick D. Miller 1985 “Mobilization and meaning: Toward an integration of social psychological and resource perspectives on social movement.” Sociological Inquiry 55:38–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1975 The Politics of Women's Liberation. Palo Alto: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983a “A model for analyzing the strategic options of social movement organization.” In Jo Freeman (ed.), Social Movements of the Sixties and Seventies: 191–210. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983b Social Movements of the Sixties and Seventies. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, William A. 1975 The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Noreen, Charles Westoff, andCharles Hammerslough 1984 “Demography of the marriage market in the United States.” Population Index 50:5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Betty MacMorran 1971 “Sex bias and cyclical unemployment.” The Nation, 14 June: 742–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Alan, Ronald Smith, andBarbara Wallston 1983 “The men's movement: Personal versus political.” In Jo Freeman (ed.), Social Movements of the Sixties and Seventies: 71–81. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruttentag, Marcia andPaul Secord 1983 Too Many Women? Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hechter, Michael 1975 Internal Colonialism: The Celtic Fringe in British National Development. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heer, David andAmyra Grossbard-Shechtman 1981 “The impact of the female marriage squeeze and the contraceptive revolution on sex roles and the women's liberation movement in the U.S., 1960 to 1975.” Journal of Marriage and the Family43:49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Joan 1980 “Will U.S. fertility decline toward zero?” Sociological Quarterly 21:481–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Joan andGlenna Spitze 1980 “Considering divorce: An expansion of Becker's theory of marital instability.” American Journal of Sociology 86:75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. Craig 1983 “Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 9:527–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Jo Ann andRachel A. Rosenfeld 1989 “Women's occupations and local labor markets: 1950–80.” Social Forces 67:666–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, Roseabeth Moss 1977 “Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women.” American Journal of Sociology 82:965–990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klandermans, Bert 1984 “Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization.” American Sociological Review 49:583–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Ethel 1984 Gender Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, Nancy 1987 “Niche theory and social movements: A population ecology approach.” Sociological Quarterly 28:51–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenski, Gerhard 1983 Power and Privilege. (1966) Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwell, Gerald andPamela Oliver 1984 “Collective action theory and social movements research.” In Research in Social Movements, Conflict, and Change, Vol. 7:1–27. Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Karen Oppenheim andYu-Hsia Lu 1988 “Attitudes toward women's familial roles: Changes in the United States, 1977–1985.” Gender and Society 2:39–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug, John McCarthy, andMayer Zald 1988 “Social movements.” In Neil J. Smelser (ed.), Handbook of Sociology: 695–737. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John andMayer Zald 1977 “Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory.” American Journal of Sociology 82:1212–1241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, Robert 1985 “Consequences of the rise in female labor force participation rates: Questions and probes.” Journal of Labor Economics 3:S117-S146.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1976 “Women's work and economic crisis: Some lessons from the Great Depression.” Review of Radical Political Economics 8:73–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1987 Gender at Work: The Dynamics of Job Segregation by Sex during World War II. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Joane 1982 “Collective action and public policy: American Indian mobilization.” Social Science Journal 19:37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, François 1985 “Toward a theory of ethnic solidarity in modern societies.” American Sociological Review 50:133–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberschall, Anthony 1983 “Collective behavior and social movements.” In Robert Hagedorn (ed.), Sociology: chap. 19, Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donnell, Carol 1984 The Basis of the Bargain: Gender, Schooling, and Job. Sydney: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 “Contemporary ethnic mobilization.” Annual Review of Sociology 9:355–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1992 The Dynamics of Ethnic Competition and Conflict. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, Barbara 1988 “Bringing the men back in: Sex differentiation and devaluation of women's work.” Gender and Society 2:58–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, Barbara andHeidi Hartmann 1986 Women's Work, Men's Work. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, Barbara andIrene Padavic 1988 “Supervisors as gatekeepers.” Social Problems 35:501–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindfuss, Ronald, S. Philip Morgan, andC. Gray Swicegood 1988 First Births in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Donald 1979 “Two movements in pursuit of equal employment opportunity.” Signs 4:413–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, Robert andJohn Baj 1985 “The impact of the marriage squeeze in five western countries.” Sociology and Social Research 70:8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Tom 1976 “A study of trends in the political role of women.” In Studies of Social Change Since 1948, Vol. II:254–295. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staggenborg, Suzanne 1989 “Organizational and environmental influences on the development of the pro-choice movement.” Social Forces 68:204–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles 1978 From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census Various years Current Population Reports, P-25 Series. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census Various years Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics Various years Employment and Earnings. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • Waite, Linda 1981 “U.S. women at work.” Population Bulletin 36(2).

  • Ward, Kathryn B. andFred Pampel 1985 “Structural determinants of female labor force participation in developed countries.” Social Science Quarterly 66:654–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, Lenore, J. 1985 The Divorce Revolution. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whicker, Marcia andJennie Kronenfeld 1986 Sex Role Changes: Technology, Politics, and Policy. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zald, Mayer andJohn McCarthy 1980 “Social movement industries: Competition and cooperation among movement organizations.” In Research in Social Movements, Conflict and Change, Vol. 3:1–20. Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zald, Mayer andBert Useem 1987 “Movement and countermovement interaction: Mobilization, tactics, and state involvement.” In Mayer Zald and John McCarthy (eds.), Social Movements in an Organizational Society: 247–272. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenfeld, R.A., Ward, K.B. The contemporary U.S. women's movement: An empirical example of competition theory. Sociol Forum 6, 471–500 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01114473

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01114473

Key words

Navigation