Abstract
This paper examines the social construction of conflict over environmental health and safety issues (i.e., environmental risk). Four explanations for such conflict are commonly offered in the environmental policy literature. We examine the interests served by each. We hypothesize that environmental policy professionals hold definitions of conflict consistent with the values and interests of the organizations for which they work and the professions of which they are members. These definitions enhance the legitimacy of the resources those groups possess in relative abundance. Data from a survey of risk professionals are generally consistent with these hypotheses. We conclude by generalizing beyond environmental conflict to identify ways in which disputes about the nature of a social problem or conflict are often at the same time struggles to determine the value of the resources available to social movements and their opponents.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abel, Richard L. 1985 “Blaming victims.” American Bar Foundation Research Journal 1985(2):401–417.
Abelson, Philip H. 1983 “Waste management.” Science 220:1003.
Andrews, Frank M. andRobert C. Messenger 1973 Multivariate Nominal Scale Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
Borden, Richard J. andJanice L. Francis 1978 “Who cares about ecology? Personality and sex differences in environmental concern.” Journal of Personality 46:190–203.
Catton, William R. andRiley E. Dunlap, Jr. 1980 “A new ecological paradigm for post-exuberant society.” American Behavioral Scientist 24:15–47.
Cohen, Jean L. 1985 “Strategy or identity: New theoretical paradigms and contemporary social movements.” Social Research 52:663–716.
Cotgrove, Stephen 1982 Catastrophe or Cornucopia: The Environment, Politics and the Future. New York: Wiley.
Covello, Vincent T. andJeryl Mumpower 1985 “Risk analysis and risk management: An historic perspective.” Risk Analysis 5:103–120.
Dickson, David 1984 The New Politics of Science. New York: Pantheon Books.
Dietz, Thomas andRobert W. Rycroft 1987 The Risk Professionals. New York: Russell Sage.
Douglas, Mary andAaron Wildavsky 1982 Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Downey, Gary L. 1986 “Ideology and the Clamshell identity: Organizational dilemmas in the antinuclear power movement.” Social Problems 33:357–373.
Dunlap, Riley E. andMarvin E. Olson 1984 “Hard-path versus soft-path advocates: A study of energy activists.” Policy Studies Journal 13:413–428.
Dunlap, Riley E. andKent D. Van Liere 1984 “Commitment to the dominant social paradigm and concern for environmental quality.” Social Science Quarterly 64:1013–1028.
Eder, Klaus 1985 “The ‘new social movements’: Moral crusades, political pressure groups or social movements.” Social Research 52:869–890.
Gamson, William 1975 The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
Gamson, William andAndre Modigliani 1987 “The changing culture of affirmative action.” Research in Political Sociology, 3:137–177. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Gillespie, Michael W. 1977 “Log-linear techniques and the regression analysis of dummy dependent variables: Further bases for comparison.” Sociological Methods and Research 6:103–122.
Goldberger, Arthur S. 1964 Econometric Theory. New York: Wiley.
Goodman, Leo A. 1961 “Snowball sampling.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 32:148–170.
Gramsci, Antonio 1957 The Modern Prince and Other Writings. New York: International Publishers.
Green, Harold P. 1980 “Statement of Harold P. Green, Attorney, Professor of Law, George Washington University, Washington, D.C.” In Risk/Benefit Analysis in the Legislative Process: 35–39. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Habermas, Jurgen 1981 “New social movements.” Telos 49:33–37.
Hays, Samuel P. 1987 Beauty, Health, and Permanence: Environmental Politics in the United States, 1955–1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Honnold, Julie A. 1984 “Age and environmental concern: Some specifications of the effects.” Journal of Environmental Education 16:4–9.
Hutt, Peter B. 1978 “The basis and purpose of government regulation of adulterations and misbranding of food.” Food, Drug and Cosmetic Law Journal 33(10):2–74.
Jenkins, Craig 1983 “Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 9:527–553. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
Kash, Don R. andRobert W. Rycroft 1984 U.S. Energy Policy. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Kemeny, John G. 1980 “Saving American democracy: The lessons of Three Mile Island.” Technology Review 82 (June–July): 67–75.
Knoke, David 1975 “A comparison of log-linear and regression models for systems of dichotomous variables.” Sociological Methods and Research 3:416–434.
Luker, Kristin 1984 Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lynn, Frances M. 1986 “The interplay of science and values in assessing and regulating environmental risks.” Science, Technology and Human Values 11:40–50.
Manski, Charles F. 1981 “Structural models for discrete data: The analysis of discrete choice.” In Samuel Leinhardt (ed.), Sociological Methodology: 58–104. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mazur, Allan 1985 “Bias in risk-benefit analysis.” Technology in Society 7:25–30.
McAdam, Doug 1983 “Tactical innovation and the pace of insurgency.” American Sociological Review 48:735–754.
1973 “Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior.” In Paul Zarembka (ed.), Frontiers of Econometrics: 105–142. New York: Academic.
1976 “A comment on discriminant analysis ‘versus’ logit analysis.” Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 5:511–524.
Milbrath, Lester W. 1984 Environmentalists: Vanguard for a New Society. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Morrison, Denton E. andRiley E. Dunlap 1986 “Environmentalism and elitism: A conceptual and empirical analysis.” Environmental Management 10:581–589.
National Materials Advisory Board 1983 Management of Hazardous Industrial Wastes: Research and Development Needs. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council 1984 Social and Economic Aspects of Radioactive Waste Disposal: Considerations for Institutional Management. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Offe, Claus 1985 “New social movements: Challenging the boundaries of institutional politics.” Social Research 52:817–868.
Olson, Mancur 1965 The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
Petchesky, R. P. 1985 “Bombing feminism.” The Nation, February 2:101.
Regens, James L. andRobert W. Rycroft 1988 The Acid Rain Controversy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Rhodes, Steven L. andPaulette Middleton 1983 “The complex challenge of controlling acid rain.” Environment 25 (May):6–9, 31–38.
Sandler, Ross 1982 “EPA's secret ‘science courts.’” Environment 24 (January/February): 4–5.
1977 “Obstacles to environmental research by scientists and technologists: A social structural analysis.” Social Problems 24:500–520.
1980 The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity. New York: Oxford University Press.
1983 “Redistributive goals versus distributive politics: Social equity limits in environmental and appropriate technology movements.” Sociological Inquiry 53:200–219.
1986 “The role of experts and mediators in the channeling of distributional conflicts.” In Allan Schnaiberg, Nicholas Watts, and K. Zimmermann (eds.), Distributional Conflicts in Environmental-Resource Policy: 348–362. Aldershot, England: Gower.
Schneider, Joseph W. 1985 “Social problems theory: The constructionist view.” Annual Review of Sociology 11:209–229. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
1980 “Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk.” In R. Schwing and W. A. Albers, Jr. (eds.), Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough?: 181–216. New York: Plenum.
1982 “Facts versus fears: Understanding perceived risk.” In Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky (eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: 463–489. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Snow, David A., E. Burke Rochford, Jr., Steven K. Worden, andRobert D. Benford 1986 “Frame alignment processes, micromobilization and movement participation.” American Sociological Review 51:464–481.
Spector, Malcolm andJohn I. Kitsuse 1977 Constructing Social Problems. Menlo Park, CA: Cummings.
Stern, Paul C. andElliot Aronson, eds. 1984 Energy Use: The Human Dimension. New York: Freeman.
Stern, Paul C., Thomas Dietz, andJ. Stanley Black 1986 “Support for environmental protection: The role of moral norms.” Population and Environment 8:204–222
Sudman, Seymour 1976 Applied Sampling. New York: Wiley.
Touraine, Alain 1985 “An introduction to the study of social movements.” Social Research 52:749–787.
Touraine, Alain, Zsuzsa Hegedus, Francois Duket, andMichel Wieviorka 1983 Anti-Nuclear Protest. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Van Liere, Kent D. andRiley E. Dunlap 1980 “The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations, and empirical evidence.” Public Opinion Quarterly 44:181–197.
Zinberg, Dorothy S. 1983 “The public, experts, and government: A delicate balance among the participants.” In Dorothy S. Zinberg (ed.), Uncertain Power: 3–28. New York: Pergamon.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dietz, T., Stern, P.C. & Rycroft, R.W. Definitions of conflict and the legitimation of resources: The case of environmental risk. Sociol Forum 4, 47–70 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112616
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112616