Abstract
This article identifies and explores some unresolved problems surrounding the role of theory and evidence in qualitative research. It begins by distinguishing among various meanings of the term ‘theory’, focusing in particular on the view that portrays it as consisting of specific explanatory principles. An ambivalence towards theory on the part of qualitative researchers is highlighted, showing how the influence of positivism persists despite explicit rejection of it. The problems involved in non-positivist reinterpretations are discussed, notably the attempt to integrate theory with description. The focus of the paper then turns to the concept of evidence. Here again a tendency for qualitative researchers to inherit an empiricist approach is identified, and the implications of abandoning it are outlined. Finally, it is argued that theory must not be seen as the only or even as the most important product of qualitative (or indeed of quantitative) research; several types of product are possible, each placing different requirements on the researcher.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ball, S. (1983). Case study research in education: some notes and problems, in M. Hammersley (ed.),The Ethnography of Schooling, Driffield, Nafferton Books.
Becker, H. S. (1967). Whose side are we on?,Social Problems 14: 239–48.
Becker, H. S. (1970).Sociological Work, Chicago, Aldine.
Blumer, H. (1969). The methodological position of symbolic interactionism, in H. Blumer,Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method, Englewood Cliffs NJ, Prentice-Hall.
Bryant, C. G. A. (1985),Positivism in Social Theory and Research, London, Macmillan.
Clifford, J. and Marcus, G. (eds.), (1986).Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, Berkeley, University of California Press.
Coats, A. W. (1989). Explanations in history and economics,Social Research 56(2): 331–60.
Dray, W. (1964).Philosophy of History, Englewood Cliffs NJ, Prentice-Hall.
Eisner, E. and Peshkin, A. (eds.) (1990).Qualitative Inquiry: The Continuing Debate, New York, Teachers College Press.
Geertz, C. (1975). Thick description, inThe Interpretation of Cultures, London, Hutchinson.
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. (1967).The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Chicago, Aldine.
Guba, E. (ed.) (1990).The Paradigm Dialog, Newbury Park, Sage.
Guba, E. (1992). Relativism,Curriculum Inquiry 22(1): 17–20.
Hage, J. and Meeker, B. F. (1988).Social Causality, London, Unwin Hyman.
Hammersley, M. (1985). From ethnography to theory,Sociology 19(2): 244–59.
Hammersley, M. (1989).The Dilemma of Qualitative Method: Herbert Blumer and the Chicago Tradition, London, Routledge.
Hammersley, M. (1991).Reading Ethnography: A Critical Guide, London, Longman.
Hammersley, M. (1992a).What's Wrong with Ethnography: Methodological Explorations, London, Routledge.
Hammersley, M. (1992b). On feminist methodology,Sociology 26(2): 187–206.
Hanson, N. R. (1958).Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Harvey, L. (1987).Myths of the Chicago School of Sociology, Aldershot, Avebury.
Hirst, P. H. (1983). Educational theory, from P. H. Hirst (ed.),Educational Theory and its Foundation Disciplines, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Kolakowski, L. (1975).Husserl and the Search for Certitude, New Haven, Yale University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970).The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Lather, P. (1991).Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy with/in the Postmodern, New York, Routledge.
McCall, G. and Simmons, J. (1969).Issues in Participant Observation, Reading Mass. Addison Wesley.
Matza, D. (1969).Becoming Deviant, Englewood Cliffs NJ, Prentice-Hall.
Merton, R. K. (1957).Social Theory and Social Structure, Glencoe, Ill, Free Press.
Phillips, D. (1990). Subjectivity and objectivity: an objective inquiry, in E. Eisner and A. Peshkin (eds.),Qualitative Inquiry in Education, New York, Teachers College Press.
Skagestad, P. (1981).The Road of Inquiry: Charles Peirce's Pragmatic Realism, New York, Columbia University Press.
Strauss, A. (1987).Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists, New York, Cambridge University Press.
Williams, M. (1991).Unnatural Doubts: Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Scepticism, Oxford, Blackwell.
Williams, R. (1976). Symbolic interactionism: fusion of theory and research, in D. C. Thorns (ed.),New Directions in Sociology, London, David and Charles.
Wittgenstein, L. (1969).On Certainty, Oxford, Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hammersley, M. Theory and evidence in qualitative research. Qual Quant 29, 55–66 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01107983
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01107983