Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the DSFI as a test of organic impotence

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sexuality and Disability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Psychology tests offer the potential for a rapid inexpensive screening of patients with complaints of erectile impotence so that either surgical therapy or sexual counseling can be offered. In this study we evaluated the Derogatis Sexual Functioning Inventory (DSFI), in order to determine if it is a useful discriminator of organic and psychogenic impotence. Thirty-nine patients referred for complaints of erectile impotence completed the test. The diagnosis of 26 of those patients was identified by several other means and subjects were categorized into groups of either Organic or Psychogenic Impotence. Significant group differences were identified in two of the ten sub-tests of the DSFI profile. Those sub-tests, Affect and Satisfaction, clearly differentiated patients with Organic and Psychogenic Impotence. A Cutting score analysis using those sub-tests resulted in a 75 percent rate of classification of patients, a significant improvement over chance alone. Patients with Organic Impotence were correctly assigned by the Affects cutting score with an accuracy of 94 percent. Our early results suggest that the DSFI can differentiate between patients with Organic and Psychogenic Impotence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beutler LE, Karacan IM. Anch., Salis PJ, Scott FF, Williams RL: MMPI and MIT discriminators of biogenic and psychogenic impotence.J Consult Clin Psychol 43:899, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beutler LE, Scott FB, Karacan I: Psychological screening of impotent men.J Urology 116:193, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Staples RB, Ficher IV, Shapiro M, Martin K, Gonick P: A re-evaluation of MMPI Discriminators of Biogenic and Psychogenic Impotence.J Consult Clin Psychol 48:543, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Derogatis LR, Meyer JK, Dupkin CN: Discrimination of organic verses psychogenic impotence with the DSFI.J Sex Marital Therapy 2:229, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher C, Schiavi RC, Edwards A, Davis DM, Reitman M, Fine J: Evaluation of nocturnal penile tumescence in the differential diagnosis of sexual impotence.Arch Gen Psychiatry 36:451, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rorer LG, Hoffman, PJ, La Forge GE, Hseih KC: Optimum cutting scores to discriminate groups of unequal size and variaire.J Appl Psychol 50:153, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Derogatis LR, Meyer JK: A psychological profile of the sexual dysfunction.Arch Sex Behav 8:201, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melman, A., Redfield, J. Evaluation of the DSFI as a test of organic impotence. Sex Disabil 4, 108–114 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01101793

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01101793

Keywords

Navigation