Skip to main content
Log in

In vitro amino acid digestibility of food proteins as measured by the digestion cell technique

  • Published:
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The digestibility of proteins and individual amino acids of nineteen selected foods was determined by anin vitro assay. Samples were hydrolysed with pepsin for 30 minutes in an acidic medium; the pH was then raised to 7.5 and the mixture poured into the dialysis bag (molecular weight cut-off 1000) of a digestion cell with pancreatin. Digestion products, mixtures of free amino acids and low molecular weight peptides which pass through the dialysis membrane, were collected for 6 hours by sodium phosphate buffer circulation. All proteins from animal sources displayed a digestibility similar to casein, except for breakfast sausage. Vegetable proteins showed intermediate digestibility, except for cereals (lower) or peanut butter (higher). Target amino acids of enzymes were generally more readily hydrolysed. However, compared to other animal proteins, glycine in milk products, valine, isoleucine, methionine and lysine in breakfast sausage and hot dog, and histidine in tuna were more easily released. Overheating of non-fat dried milk not only reduced the lysine digestibility, but also that of methionine, phenylalanine, histidine and cystine. Among vegetable proteins, wheat products were characterized by a relatively greater release of threonine, isoleucine and histidine, and peas by a lower digestibility of methionine and lysine. Proline of soy isolate and isoleucine of pinto bean were resistant to hydrolysis while arginine of pinto beans and of rice-wheat-gluten was easily released.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Silano V (1976) Factors affecting digestibility and availability of proteins in cereals. In: Nutritional Evaluation of Cereal Mutants. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Vienna, pp. 13–46

  2. Serraino MR, Thompson LU, Savoie L, Parent G (1985) Effect of Phytic acid on thein vitro rate of digestibility of rapeseed protein and amino-acids. Journal of Food Science 50(6): 1689–1692

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bodwell CE (1977) Problems associated with the development and application of rapid methods of assessing protein quality. Nutr Rep Int 16: 163–178

    Google Scholar 

  4. Friedman M, Masters PM (1980) Amino acid racemization in alkali-treated food proteins. Chemistry, toxicology, and nutritional consequences. In: Whitaker JR, Fujimaki M (eds) Chemical Deterioration of Proteins. ACS Symposium Series, No. 123. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, pp. 165–194

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mauron J, Mottu F, Bujard E, Egli RH (1955) The availability of lysine, methionine and tryptophan in condensed milk and milk powder.In vitro digestion studies. Arch Biochem Biophys 59: 433–451

    Google Scholar 

  6. Steinhart H, Kirchgessner R (1973)In vitro Verdauungsapparatur zur enzymatischen Hydrolyse von Protein. Arch Tierernaehr 23: 449–459

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gauthier SF, Vachon C, Jones JD, Savoie L (1982) Assessment of protein digestibility byin vitro enzymatic hydrolysis with simultaneous dialysis. J Nutr 1121: 718–1725

    Google Scholar 

  8. Savoie L, Parent G (1987). Characterization ofin vitro protein digestion products by Copper-Sephadex chromatography. Nutr Rep Int 35(4): 783–790

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vachon C, Gauthier S, Jones SD, Savoie L (1983)In vitro enzymatic release of amino acid from alkali-treated proteins containing lysinoalanine. Nutr Rep Intern 27(6): 1303–1313

    Google Scholar 

  10. Savoie L, Gauthier SF (1986) Dialysis cell for the measurement of protein digestibility. J Food Sci 51: 494–498

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gauthier SF, Vachon C, Savoie L (1986) Enzymatic conditions of anin vitro method to study protein digestion. J Food Sci 51: 960–964

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vachon C, Gauthier SF, Charbonneau R, Savoie L (1987) Relationship betweenin vitro digestion products and protein quality. Reprod Nutr Develop 27: 659–672

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sarwar G, Peace RW, Botting HG, Brulé D (1989) Digestibility of protein and amino acids in selected foods as determined by a rat balance method. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 39: 23–32

    Google Scholar 

  14. Method no. 330 from Department of Food Science and Technology, Labconco Corporation, Kansas City, MO, USA

  15. Anson ML (1938) The estimation of pepsin, trypsin, papain and cathepsin with hemoglobin. J Gen Physiol 22: 79–89

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hummel BCW (1959) A modified spectrophotometric determination of chymotrypsin, trypsin and thrombin. Can J Biochem Physiol 37: 1393

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schwert GW, Takenata Y (1955) A spectrophotometric determination of trypsin and chymotrypsin. Biochem Biophys Acta 16: 570

    Google Scholar 

  18. Spindler M, Stadler R, Tanner H (1984) Amino acid analysis of feedstuffs: Determination of methionine and cystine after oxidation with performic acid and hydrolysis. J Agric Food Chem 32: 1366

    Google Scholar 

  19. MacDonald JL, Krueger MW, Keller JH (1985) Determination of cysteine plus cystine as cysteic acid and methionine sulfone following performic oxidation. J Assoc Official Anal Chemists 68: 826–829

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hopkins DT (1981) Effects of variation in protein digestibility. In: Bodwell CE, Adkins JS, Hopkins DT (eds) Protein Quality in Humans: Assessment andin vitro Estimation. Westport, Connecticut: AVI Publishing Company

    Google Scholar 

  21. Anderson PA (1985) Interactions between proteins and constituants that affect protein quality. In: Finley WF, Hopkins DT (eds) Digestibility and amino Acid Availability in Cereals and Oilseed. St. Paul, Minnesota: American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc., pp. 31–38

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gray MG, Cooper LH (1971) Protein digestion and absorption. Gastroenterology 61(4): 535–544

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tanksley TD Jr, Knabe A (1985) Direct measurements of amino acid digestibility in swine. In: Finley WF, Hopkins DT (eds) Digestibility and Amino Acid Availability in Cereals and Oilseeds. St. Paul, Minnesota: American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc., pp. 259–265

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chung YC, Kim YS, Shadchehr A, Garrido A, MacGregor IL, Sleisenger MH (1979) Protein digestion and absorption in human small intestine. Gastroenterology 76: 1415–1421

    Google Scholar 

  25. Adibi SA, Mercer DW (1973) Protein digestion in human intestine as reflected in luminal, mucosal and plasma amino acid concentrations after meals. J Clin Invest 52: 1586–1594

    Google Scholar 

  26. Abidi SA, Kim YS (1981) Peptide absorption and hydrolysis. In: Johnson LR (ed.) Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract. New York: Raven Press, pp. 1073–1095

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Savoie, L., Charbonneau, R. & Parent, G. In vitro amino acid digestibility of food proteins as measured by the digestion cell technique. Plant Food Hum Nutr 39, 93–107 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01092406

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01092406

Key words

Navigation