Skip to main content
Log in

Protein quality and digestible energy of selected foods determined in balance trials with rats

  • Published:
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chemical analyses and balance trials with rats of 17 foods showed marked differences in protein quality. According to anin vitro procedure true protein digestibility was high (around 90%). The same was also the case for thein vivo values with the exception of two legumes, beans and chick peas, which were digested to a markedly lower degree when compared to thein vitro values. The assumed reason for this is discussed. Due to extensive differences in the amino acid composition of the 17 samples BV varied considerably with the lowest value (45.5) of rice-wheat gluten breakfast cereal. Energy digestibility was generally high. Amino acid digestibility determinedin vivo followed the pattern of the corresponding protein digestibility, although marked differences occurred from one amino acid to another in the same food.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beames RM, Eggum BO (1981) The effect of type and level of protein, fibre and starch on nitrogen excretion patterns in rats. Br J Nutr 46: 301–313

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bech-Andersen S (1987) Tryptophan determination in feedstuffs. In preparation

  3. Donangelo CM, Eggum BO (1985) Comparative effects of wheat brans and barley husk on nutrient utilization in rats. 1. Protein and energy. Br J Nutr 56: 269–280

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eggum BO (1973) A study of certain factors influencing protein utilization in rats and pigs. Publ 406 National Institute of Animal Science, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hsu HW, Sutton NE, Banjo MO, Satterlee LD, Kendrick JG (1978) The C-PER and T-PER assays for protein quality. Fd Technol 32: 69–73

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mason VC, Bech-Andersen S, Rudemo M (1980) Hydrolysate preparation for amino acid determinations in feed constituents. Z Tierphysiol Tierernahrg u Futtermittelkde 43: 146–164

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mauron J (1970) “Nutritional evaluation of proteins by enzymatic methods”, in Bender AE, Kihlberg R, Lofqvist B and Munck L (eds) Evaluation of Novel Protein Products Proc Int Biol Programme, Wenner-Gren Symposium, 1968 (Pergamon Press, Oxford) pp. 211–234

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pedersen B, Eggum BO (1983) Prediction of protein digestibility by anin vitro enzymatic pH stat procedure. Z f Tierphysiol Tierernahrg u Futtermittelkde 49: 265–277

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pellett PL, Young VR (1980) (eds) Nutritional evaluation of protein foods, United Nations University Tokyo Japan, pp. 154

    Google Scholar 

  10. Satterlee LD, Marshall HF, Tennyson JM (1979) Measuring protein quality. J Amer Oil Chem Soc 56: 103–109

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eggum, B.O., Hansen, I. & Larsen, T. Protein quality and digestible energy of selected foods determined in balance trials with rats. Plant Food Hum Nutr 39, 13–21 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01092397

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01092397

Key words

Navigation