Skip to main content
Log in

Systemic requisites of communal groups

  • Published:
Alternative Lifestyles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Functional analysis, which deals specifically with the systemic needs of social organizations, is utilized here to specify the structural necessities of communal groups. The adaptive and goal attainment functions of social systems are the principal foci of this research. The present research is based on a content analysis of literature dealing with the communal movement in America. A snowball sampling technique yielded 58 communes for which data on the variables of interest could be obtained. Two organizational features, financial situation at the time of a commune's formation and type of social organization, were selected as independent variables and were examined in order to ascertain their effects on the duration of communal groups, the dependent variable. Both gamma and chisquare indicate that financial situation and type of social organization significantly influence the duration of communal groups. Sufficient finances for the stabilization and maintenance of the communal organization, and a type of social organization which adequately coordinates the activities of the group, seem to be systemic problems with which communal groups must deal in order to endure for an extended length of time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABRAMS, P. and A. McCULLOCK (1976) Communes, Sociology and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BALLOU, A. (1972) History of the Hopedale Community, Philadelphia: Porcupine Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BENNETT, J. W. (1973) “The managed democracy of the Hutterites,” pp. 192–205 in R. M. Kanter (ed.) Communes: Creating and Managing the Collective Life. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • BERGER, B. M. and B. M. HACKETT (1974) “On the decline of age grading in rural hippie communes.” J. of Social Issues 30 (Summer): 163–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • BESTOR, A. (1970) Backwoods Utopias. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BLAU, P. M. (1970a) “Functional theory,” pp. 87–92 in O. Grusky and G. A. Miller (eds.) The Sociology of Organizations: Basic Studies. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1970b) “Exchange theory,” pp. 127–148 in O. Grusky and G. A. Miller (eds.) The Sociology of Organizations: Basic Studies. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOUVARD, M. (1975) The Intentional Community Movement: Building a New Moral World. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRYANT, C. D. and J. G. WELLS [eds.] (1973) Deviancy and the Family. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • COGSWELL, B. E. (1975) “Variant family forms and life styles: rejection of the traditional nuclear family.” Family Coordinator 24 (October): 391–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • CONOVER, P. W. (1975) “An analysis of communes and intentional communities with particular attention to sexual and genderal relations.” Family Coordinator 24 (October): 453–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • CURTIS, E. R. (1961) A Season in Utopia: The Story of Brook Farm. New York: Thomas Nelson & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • FELLMAN, M. (1973) The Unbounded Frame: Freedom and Community in Nineteenth Century American Utopianism. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • FOGARTY, R. S. (1972) American Utopianism. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRENCH, D. and E. FRENCH (1975) Working Communally: Patterns and Possibilities. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • GARDNER, H. (1973) “Crises and politics in rural communes,” pp. 150–166 in R. M. Kanter (ed.) Communes: Creating and Managing the Collective Life. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • GODENNE, G. D. (1974) “Sex and today's youth.” Adolescence 33 (Spring): 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • HILLQUIT, M. (1903) History of Socialism in the United States. New York: Funk & Wagnalls.

    Google Scholar 

  • HINDS, W. A. (1908) American Communities and Cooperative Colonies. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr.

    Google Scholar 

  • HINE, R. V. (1966) California's Utopian Colonies. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOURIET, R. (1971) Getting Back Together. New York: Coward, McCann & Geoghegan.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- (1969) “Life and death of a commune called Oz.” New York Times Magazine (February 16): 473–484.

  • ISRAEL, M. L., (1971) “Two communal houses and why (I think) they failed.” J. of Behavior Technology 1 (Summer): 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • KANTER, R. M. [ed.] (1973) Communes: Creating and Managing the Collective Life. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1968) “Commitment and social organization: a study of commitment mechanisms in utopian communities.” Amer. Soc. Rev. 33 (August): 499–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • KEPHART, W. M. (1974) “Why they fail: a socio-historical analysis of religious and secular communes.” J. of Comparative Family Studies 5 (Autumn): 130–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • KINKADE, K. (1973) A Walden Two Experiment: The First Five Years of Twin Oaks Community. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • KNAPP, J. J. (1975) “Some non-monogamous marriage styles and related attitudes and practices of marriage counselors.” Family Coordinator 24 (October): 505–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAMOTT, K. (1968) “Doing their thing at Morning Star.” Horizon 10 (Spring): 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • LINDT, G. (1969) “Family surrogates in Colonial America: the Moravian experiment.” J. of Marriage and the Family 31 (November): 651–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOUBERE, L. (1974) Utopian Socialism: Its History Since 1800. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.

    Google Scholar 

  • MARCIANO, T. D. (1975) “Variant family forms in a world perspective.” Family Coordinator 24 (October): 407–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • MARX, J.H. and D. L. ELLISON (1975) “Sensitivity training and communes: contemporary quests for community.” Pacific Soc. Rev. 18 (October): 442–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOYES, J. H. (1961) History of American Socialisms. New York: Hillary House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'NEILL, N. and G. O'NEILL (1972) Open Marriage. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • OTTO, H. A. [ed.] (1971) The Family in Search of a Future. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • PARSONS, T. (1970) “Social systems,” pp. 75–82 in O. Grusky and G. A. Miller (eds.) The Sociology of Organizations: Basic Studies. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAMEY, J. W. (1975) “Intimate groups and networks: frequent consequences of sexually open marriage.” Family Coordinator 24 (October): 515–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROBERTS, R. E. (1971) The New Communes: Coming Together in America. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIMMONDS, R. B., J. T. RICHARDSON, and M. W. HARDER (1974) “Organizational aspects of a Jesus movement community.” Social Compass 21 (Autumn): 269–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKOLNICK, A. and J. SKOLNICK (1974) Intimacy, Family and Society. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1971) Family in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • STREIB, G. F. [ed.] (1973) The Changing Family: Adaptation and Diversity. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • SUSSMAN, M. B. [ed.] (1972) Non-Traditional Family Forms in the 1970's. Minneapolis: National Council on Family Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • THAMM, R. (1975) Beyond Marriage and the Nuclear Family. San Francisco: Canfield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • TOFFLER, A. (1970) Future Shock. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • TYLER, A. F. (1944) Freedom's Ferment. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • VEYSEY, L. (1973) The Communal Experience. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEBBER, E. (1959) Escape to Utopia: The Communal Movement in America. New York: Hastings House.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEISS, M. (1974) Living Together: A Year in the Life of a City Commune. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEITZMAN, L. J. (1975) “To love, honor, and obey? Traditional legal marriage and alternative forms.” Family Coordinator 24 (October): 531–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZABLOCKI, B. (1973) “Problems of anarchism on hippie communes,” pp. 167–177 in R. M. Kanter (ed.) Communes: Creating and Managing the Collective Life. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mowery, J. Systemic requisites of communal groups. J Fam Econ Iss 1, 235–261 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01082415

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01082415

Keywords

Navigation