Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Back injury prevention programs: A critical review of the literature

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Back schools are increasingly utilized as an injury prevention strategy employed at the worksite. Yet, evidence of the efficacy of back schools is limited and controversial. A review of the literature showed variance in methodologies and consequently, outcomes. Outcome measures used include physical capacity, functional abilities, costs, lost time, absenteeism, perception of pain, lifting performance, attitudes, and job satisfaction. In many studies, lack of randomization and control was found to be a limitation in experimental design. Studies which used the behavioral approach of measuring lifting behavior lacked followup and evidence of long-term effects. The type of education and feedback or reinforcement was an important issue not well-defined in the literature. A variety of hypothetical mechanisms were described as contributing to the outcome of back injury prevention programs. Additional controlled research is necessary to determine the specific mechanisms of change in an effort to further improve outcome in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersson GB, Pope MH, Frymoyer JW. Epidemiology. In: Pope MH, Frymoyer JW, Andersson GB, eds.Occupational low back pain. New York: Prager Publishers, 1984, pp. 104–114.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deede B, McGovern P. Low back problems: Etiology and prevention.Am Assoc Occup Health Nursing 1987; 35: 341–348.

    Google Scholar 

  3. White AA, Gordon SL. Synopsis: Workshop on idiopathic low back pain.Spine 1982; 7: 141–149.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burton JF, ed.Worker's Compensation Monitor. Quoted inThe Wall Street Journal May 24, 1991.

  5. Burton CV, Cassidy JD. Economics, epidemiology, and risk factors. In: Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Burton CV, eds.Managing low back pain. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1992, pp. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frymoyer JW, Pope MH, Clements JH, Wilder DG, MacPherson B, Shikaga T. Risk factors in low-back pain: An epidemiological survey.J Bone Joint Surg 1983; 65: 213–218.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Biering-Sorensen F. Physical measurements as risk indicators for low-back trouble over a one-year period.Spine 1984; 9: 106–119.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Snook SH. Low back pain in industry. In: White AA, Gordin SL, eds.American academy of orthopaedic surgeons symposium on idiopathic low back pain. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby, 1982, pp. 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Domkot DK, Pope MH, Lord J, Frymoyer JW. The relationship between work history, work environment, and low-back pain in men.Spine 1984; 9: 395–399.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kelsey JL, Githens PB, White AA. An epidemiologic study of lifting and twisting on the job and risk for acute prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc.J Orthopaedic Res 1980; 2: 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Andersson GJ, Svensson H, Oden A. The intensity of work recovery in low back pain.Spine 1983; 8: 880–884.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frymoyer JW, Rosen JC, Clements J, Pope MH. Psychologic factors in low-back pain disability.Clin Orthopaedics 1985; 195: 178–184.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sirles AT, Brown K, Hilyer JC. Effects of back school education and exercise in back injured municipal workers.Am Assoc Occup Health Nursing 1991; 39: 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  14. United States Department of Health and Human Services.Draft objectives for the year 2000. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Public Health Service, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brown KC, Sirles AT, Hilyer JC, Thomas MJ. Cost-effectiveness of a back school intervention for municipal employees.Spine 1992; 17: 1224–1228.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zachrisson-Forssell M. The back school.Spine 1981; 6: 104–106.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hall H, Iceton J. Back school: An overview with specific references to the Canadian back education units.Clin Orthopaedics Related Res 1983; 179: 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hurri H. The Swedish back school in chronic low back pain. Part 1: Benefits.Scan J Rehab Med 1989; 21: 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nordin M, Cedraschi C, Balague F, Roux E. Back schools in prevention of chronicity.Bailliere's Clin Rheum 1992; 6: 685–702.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Snook SH. Approaches to the control of back pain in industry: Job design, job placement, and education/training.Occup Med 1988; 3: 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Martin L. Back basics: General information for back school participants.Occup Med 1992; 7: 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mattmiller AW. The California back school.Physiotherapy 1980; 66: 118–121.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bergquist M, Larsson U. Acute low back pain in industry: A controlled prospective study with special reference to therapy and confounding factors.Acta Orthopaedica Scan Suppl 1977; 170: 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hurri H. The Swedish back school in chronic low back pain. Part II: Factors predicting the outcome.Scan J Rehab Med 1989; 21: 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Donchin M, Woolf O, Kaplan L, Floman Y. Secondary prevention of low back pain: A clinical trial.Spine 1990; 15: 1317–1320.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kvien T, Nilsen H, Vik P. Education and self-care of patients with low back pain.Scan J Rheum 1981; 10: 318–320.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Klaber-Moffett JE, Chase S, Portek I, Ennis J. A controlled, prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of a back school in the relief of chronic low back pain.Spine 1986; 11: 120–122.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Aberg J. Evaluation of an advanced back pain rehabilitation program.Spine 1984; 9: 317–318.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Berwick D, Budman S, Feldstein M. No clinical effect of back schools in an HMO.Spine 1989; 14: 338–344.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dehlin O, Berg S, Andersson G, Grimby G. Effect of physical training and ergonomic counselling on the psychological perception of work and on the subjective assessment of low-back insufficiency.Scan J Rehab Med 1981; 13: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lankhorst GJ, VandeStadt RJ, Vogelaar TW, VanderKorst JK, Prevo AJ. The effect of the Swedish back school in chronic idiopathic low back pain.Scan J Rehab Med 1983; 15: 141–145.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Walsh, NE, Schwartz RK. The influence of prophylactic orthoses on abdominal strength and low back injury in the workplace.Am J Phys Med Rehab 1990; 69: 245–250.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ryden AL, Molgaard CA, Bobbitt SL. Benefits of a back care and light duty health promotion program in a hospital setting.J Community Health 1988; 13: 222–230.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fitzler SL. Attitudinal change: The Chelsea back program.Occup Health Safety 1982; 24–27.

  35. Fitzler SL. Chelsea back program: One year later.Occup Health Safety 1983; 52–54.

  36. Snook SH, Campanelli RA, Hart JW. A study of three preventive approaches to low back injury.J Occup Med 1978; 20: 478–481.

    Google Scholar 

  37. McElligott J, Miscovich SS, Fielding L. Low back injury in industry: The value of a recovery program.Connecticut Med 1989; 53: 711–915.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Versloot JM, Rozeman MA, vanSon AM, vanAkerveeken PF. The cost—effectiveness of a back school program in industry.Spine 1992; 17: 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lepore BA, Olson CN, Tomer GM. The dollars and sense of occupational back injury prevention training.Clin Management 1984; 4: 38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mantle M, Holmes J, Currey H. Backache in pregnancy II: Prophylactic influence of back care classes.Rheum Rehab 1981; 20: 227–232.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wood D. Design and evaluation of a back injury prevention program within a geriatric hospital.Spine 1987; 12: 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Feldstein A, Valanis B. Vollmer W, Stevens N, Overton C. The back injury prevention project pilot study.J Occup Med 1993; 35: 114–120.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Komacki J, Barwick K, Scott L. A behavioral approach to occupational safety: Pinpointing and reinforcing safe performance in a food manufacturing plant.J Appl Psych 1978; 63: 434–445.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Komacki J, Heinzmann AT, Lawson L. Effect of training and feedback: Component analysis of a behavioral safety program.J Appl Psych 1980; 65: 261–270.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Chaffin D, Gallay L, Woolley C, Kuciemba S. An evaluation of the effect of a training program on worker lifting postures.Int J Indus Ergonomics 1986; 1: 127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wollenberg SP. A comparison of body mechanic usage in employees participating in three back injury prevention programmes.Int J Nursing Stud 1989; 26: 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Carlton RS. The effects of body mechanics instruction on work performance.Am J Occup Ther 1987; 41: 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  48. St. Vincent M, Tellier C. Training in handling: An evaluative study.Ergonomics 1989; 32: 191–210.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Occupational Therapy Program, University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, P.O. Box 413, 53130, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

    Phyllis M. King M.S., O.T.R.

Authors
  1. Phyllis M. King M.S., O.T.R.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

King, P.M. Back injury prevention programs: A critical review of the literature. J Occup Rehab 3, 145–158 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01078284

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01078284

Key Words

Search

Navigation