Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative assessment of the productivity of Australia's public rail systems 1971/72–1991/92

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a growing interest in the establishment of suitable measures of the overall performance of government business enterprises, particularly railways, which are a major recipient of government subsidy. They must improve their performance and become more cost efficient. Any policy designed to reduce costs must consider the implications of resultant actions on the overall productivity of a business. We propose the use of the total factor productivity index as an appropriate reference benchmark, to enable each railway to evaluate the productivity implications of any change to the operating and managerial environment. Using the Institute of Transport Studies' rail database, total factor productivity indices are derived annually from 1971/72 to 1991/92 for the 5 major public rail systems in Australia and sources of variation are identified.

The paper recognizes the need to identify sources of variation in productivity which translate into operational guidelines for management in assisting them to improve performance over time. A contribution is the recognition of the importance of including both demand side (final output) and supply, side measures of output (intermediate output). Final output may be more important for monitoring the performance of an enterprise from a cost-effectiveness perspective, but a supply side measure is often more useful to operators because it is the dimension of output over which they have more control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Applebaum, Erina, and Joseph Berechman. (1991). “Demand Conditions, Regulation and the Measurement of Productivity,”Journal of Econometrics 47, 379–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Railways Research and Development Organisation (ARRDO). (1986).Rail Transport Performance Indicators, (Information Paper 5). Melbourne: ARRDO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunker, Donald. (1992). “Total Factor Productivity Growth in AN Rail 1980–88.”Transportation Research B 26B (6), 449–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Industry Economics. (1992).International Performance Indicators—Rail Freight (Research Report 41). Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, Douglas, Laurits Christensen, and Walter Diewert. (1982) “Multilateral Comparisons of Output, Input, and Productivity Using Superlative Index Numbers,”The Economic Journal 92, 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, Douglas, Laurits Christensen and Walter Diewert. (1982b). “The Economic Theory of Index, Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output and Productivity.”Econometrica 50 (6), 1393–1414.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMellow, Ian. (In progress).The Productivity of New South Wales Railways: 1950–1991. Sydney: Institute of Transport Studies, The University of Sydney.

  • Diewert, Walter. (1989).The Measurement of Productivity. (Discussion Paper No. 89-04). Vancouver: Department of Economics, University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Kenneth, Tae Hoon Oum, Michael Tretheway, and William Waters II. (1987).The Growth and Performance of the Canadian Transcontinental Railways 1956–1981. Vancouver: Center for Transportation Studies, University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, William. (1990).Econometric Analysis. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, David. (1992). “Total Factor Productivity Growth and Endogenous Demand: Establishing a Benchmark Index for the Selection of Operational Performance Measures in, Public Bus Firms.”Transportation Research B 26B (6), 435–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, David, Rhonda Daniels, and Ian DeMellow (1992).The Productivity of Australian Railways 1971/72 to 1990/91 (Research Report ITS-RR-92-1). Sydney: Institute of Transport Studies, The University of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, David, Rhonda Daniels, and Ian DeMellow. (1994).Revisions and Update: Productivity of Australian Railways 1971/72 to 1991/92 (Working Paper ITS-WP-94-14). Sydney: Institute, of Transport Studies, The University of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulten, Charles, and Frank Wykoff. (1981). “The Estimation of Economic Depreciation Using Vintage Asset Prices: An Application of the Box-Cox Power Transformation.”Journal of Econometrics 15, 367–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Industry Commission. (1991).Rail Transport Volumes I and II. Canberra Industry Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millan, Pablo Coto. (1994). “Scale Economies, Elasticities of Substitution and Behavior of the Railway Transport Costs in Spain” (Draft Working Paper).

  • Talvitie, Antti, and Kofi Obeng. (1991). “Productivity Measurement: A Workshop Report.” In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Competition and Ownership of Bus and Coach Services,Special Issue of Transportation Planning and Technology (Guest Editor David Hensher) 15, 169–176.

  • Windle, Robert, and Michael Dresner. (1992). “Partial Productivity Measures and Total Factor Productivity in the Air Transport Industry: Limitations and Uses”Transportation Research A (Special Issue on Performance Measurement, Guest Editor David Hensher) 26A (6), 435–446.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research reported in this paper was partially funded by an Australian Research Council grant (No. A78930595).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hensher, D.A., Daniels, R. & Demellow, I. A comparative assessment of the productivity of Australia's public rail systems 1971/72–1991/92. J Prod Anal 6, 201–223 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01076976

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01076976

Keywords

Navigation