Abstract
Up until recently social scientists took it for granted that their task was to account for the social world as objectively as possible: they were realists in practice if not always in their methodological sermons. This situation started to change in the 1960s, when a number of antirealist philosophies made inroads into social studies.
This paper examines critically the following kinds of antirealism: subjectivism, conventionalism, fictionism, social constructivism, relativism, and hermeneutics. An attempt is made to show that these philosophies are false and are causing serious damage to social studies.
Next the subjective interpretation of probability is analyzed as a case of subjectivism. An approach to the subjective perception of justice is sketched as an example of the objective study of subjective experience.
Finally, the three main varieties of realism — naive, critical, and scientific — are outlined. It is argued that the scientific attitude involves scientific realism, which is put in practice even by scholars who, like Weber and Simmel, called themselves antirealists.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert, H.: 1988, ‘Hermeneutics and economics. A criticism of hermeneutical thinking in the social sciences’,Kyklos 41, 573–602.
Archer, M.: 1987, ‘Resisting the revival of relativism’,International Sociology 2, 235–250.
Barnes, B.: 1977,Interests and the Growth of Knowledge, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Barnes, B.: 1983, ‘On the conventional character of knowledge and cognition’, in K.D. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay (Eds.), pp. 19–51.
Berger, P.L. and Luckmann, T.: 1966,The Social Construction of Reality, New York: Doubleday.
Bloor, D.: 1976,Knowledge and Social Imagery, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Boudon, R.: 1990a,L'art de se persuader des idés fausses, fragiles ou douteuses, Paris: Fayard.
Boudon, R.: 1990b, ‘On relativism’, in P. Weingartner and G. Dorn (Eds.), pp. 229–243.
Breit, W.: 1984, ‘Galbraith and Friedman: Two versions of economic reality’,Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 7, 18–28.
Bunge, M.: 1963,The Myth of Simplicity, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bunge, M.: 1967,Foundations of Physics, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer-Verlag.
Bunge, M.: 1973,Philosophy of Physics, Dordrecht: Reidel.
Bunge, M.: 1983,Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Vol. 6:Understanding the World, Dordrecht-Boston: Reidel.
Bunge, M.: 1988, ‘Two faces and three masks of probability’, in E. Agazzi (Ed.),Probability in the Sciences, pp. 27–50. Dordrecht-Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bunge, M.: 1989,Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Vol. 8:Ethics. Dordrecht-Boston: Reidel.
Bunge, M.: 1991a, ‘A critical examination of the new sociology of science, Part 1’,Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21, 524–560.
Bunge, M.: 1991b, ‘A skeptics's beliefs and disbeliefs’,New Ideas in Psychology 9, 131–149.
Bunge, M.: 1991c, ‘What is science? Does it matter to distinguish it from pseudoscience? A reply to my commentators’,New Ideas in Psychology 9, 245–283.
Bunge, M.: 1992, ‘A critical examination of the new sociology of science, Part 2’,Philosophy of the Social Sciences 22, 44–76.
Bunge, M.: 1992, ‘A critical examination of the new sociology of science. Part 2’,Philosophy of the Social Sciences 22, 46–76.
Cicourel, A.V.: 1974,Cognitive Sociology: Language and Meaning in Social Interaction, New York: Free Press.
Collins, H.M.: 1983, ‘An empirical relativist programme in the sociology of scientific knowledge’, in Knorr-Cetina and Mulkay (Eds.), pp. 85–113.
du Pasquier, G.: 1926,Le calcul des probabilités, son évolution mathématique et philosophique, Paris: Hermann.
Ferrater Mora, J.M.: 1990, ‘On Mario Bunge's semantical realism’, in Weingartner and Dorn (Eds.), pp. 29–37.
Feynman, R.P.: 1989,What do You Care What other People Think? New York: W.W. Norton.
Fleck, L.: [1935] 1979,Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Preface by T.S. Kuhn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Friedman, M.: 1953, ‘The methodology of positive economics’, inEssays in Positive Economics, pp. 3–43. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Friedman, M.: 1976,Price Theory, New York: Aldine.
Gardner, M.: 1992, ‘Probability paradoxes’,Skeptical Inquirer 16, 129–132.
Garfinkel, H.: 1967,Studies in Ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Geertz, C.: 1973,The Interpretation of Cultures, New York: Basic Books.
Goodman, N.: 1958, ‘The test of simplicity’,Science 128, 1064–1069.
Hayek, F.A.: 1955,The Counter-Revolution of Science, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Hesse, M.: 1966,Models and Analogies in Science, Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.
Husserl, E.: [1931] 1950,Cartesianische Meditationen, inHusserliana: Gesammelte Werke, Vol. 1, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Knorr-Cetina, K.D. and Mulkay, M. (Eds.): 1983,Science Observed, London: Sage.
Lalande, A.: 1938,Vocabulaire technique et critique de la philosophie, 4th ed., 3 vols. Paris: Félix Alcan.
Latour, B.: 1983, ‘Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world’, in Knorr-Cetina and Mulkay (Eds.), pp. 141–170.
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S.: 1979,Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, London: Sage.
Livingston, P.: 1988,Literary Knowledge, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Luhmann, N.: 1990,Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Merton, R.K.: 1957,Social Theory and Social Structure, Rev. Ed., Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Ricoeur, P.: 1975,La métaphore vive, Paris: Ed. du Seuil.
Schütz, A.: [1932] 1967,The Phenomenology of the Social World, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Siegel, H.: 1987,Relativism Refuted: A Criticism of Contemporary Epistemological Relativism, Dordrecht-Boston: Reidel.
Weingartner, P. and Dorn, G. (Eds.): 1990,Studies on Mario Bunge's Treatise, Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bunge, M. Realism and antirealism in social science. Theor Decis 35, 207–235 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01075199
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01075199