Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social labeling, stereotyping, and observer bias in workers' compensation: The impact of provider-patient interaction on outcome

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When injured workers with chronic musculoskeletal disorders are viewed through the narrow lens of the biomedical model, the role of situational factors is not acknowledged, and their illness behaviors and delayed recovery are often attributed to personal weakness or a desire for secondary gain. This leads to a tendency toward blame and the application of stigmatizing social labels. An overt or implied social label that carries a stigma can set into motion therapeutically counterproductive biases in social perception within the provider-patient relationship. One of most powerful of these has been called the self-fulfilling prophecy, in which expectancy-driven behaviors of the clinician, case manager, or insurance representative can subtly direct the patient to behave in a manner consistent with expectations. Justification for an attitudinal shift among providers of workers' compensation services is proposed, along with application of the biopsychosocial framework of health psychology to the problem of delayed recovery in injured workers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reid J, Ewan C, Lowy E. Pilgrimage of pain: The illness experiences of women with repetition strain injury and the search for credibility.Soc Sci Med 1991; 32(5): 601–612.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Thompson R. Fighting the high costs of workers' comp.Nation's Business 1990; March: 20–28.

    Google Scholar 

  3. King RW. The worsening ills of workers' comp.Business Week 1987; October 12: 46.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Feuerstein, M. A multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, evaluation, and management of work disability.J Occup Rehab 1991; 1(1): 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen S. Pain for pay: Pressures at the workplace can be hazardous to health.The Press-Enterprise 1989; October 29: A-3.

    Google Scholar 

  6. MacLeod D, Jacobs P, Larson N.The ergonomics manual. Minneapolis, MN: Educational Opportunities, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Isernhagen SJ. Ergonomics and cumulative trauma. In Isernhagen SJ, ed.Work injury: Management and prevention. Rockville, MD: Aspen, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chaffin DB, Herrin GD.Manual materials handling: The cause of over-exertion injury and illness in industry (monograph). Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan, Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ.Functional restoration for spinal disorders: The sports medicine approach. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leboeuf C. Review of the literature: Low back painJ Manip Physiol Ther 1991; 14(5): 311–316.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Franklin, GM, Haug J, Heyer N, Chechoway H, Peck N. Occupational carpal tunnel syndrome in Washington State, 1984–1988.Am J Pub Health 1991; 81(6): 741–746.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine.Science 1977; 196: 129–136.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Derebery VJ, Tullis, WH. Delayed recovery in the patient with a work compensable injury.J Occup Med 1983; 25(11) 829–835.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Minuchen S, Rosman BL, Baker L.Psychosomatic families: Anorexia nervosa in context. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Curry RT. Understanding patients with chronic pain in work hardening programs: 1. A psychological understanding of pain.A.O.T.A. Work Prog Spec Int Sec Newsletter 1989; 3(3): 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haig AJ, Penha S. Worker rehabilitation programs—Separating fact from fiction.West J Med 1991; 154(5): 528–531.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Matheson LN. Symptom magnification syndrome. In Isernhagen SJ, ed.Work injury: Management and prevention. Rockville, MD: Aspen, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd Ed.) (DSM-IIIR) Washington, D.C.: Author, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Waddell G, McCullock JA, Kummel E, Venner RM. Nonorganic physical signs in low-back pain.Spine 1980; 5(2): 117–125.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kellner R.Somatization and hypochondriasis. New York: Praeger, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kleinman A.The illness narratives: Suffering, healing and the human condition. New York: Basic Books, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Locker D.Symptoms and illness: The cognitive organization of disorder. New York: Tavistock Publications, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Parsons T.Social structure and personality. London: Collier-Macmillan, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mechanic D. The concept of illness behavior.J Chron Dis 1972; 15: 189–194.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pilowsky I. A general classification of abnormal illness behaviour.Brit J Med Psychiat 1978; 5: 131–137.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jones EE, Kanouse DE, Kelley HH, Nisbett RE, Valins S, Weiner B.Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, New Jersey: General Learning Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Leavitt F, Sweet JJ. Characteristics and frequency of malingering among patients with low back pain.Pain 1986; 25: 357–364.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kelley HH. Attribution theory in social psychology. In Levine D, ed.Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol 15). Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press, 1967, pp. 192–241.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kelley HH. Attribution in social interaction. In Jones EE, Kanouse DE, Kelley HH, Nisbett RE, Valis, S. Weiner B, eds.Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, New Jersey: General Learning Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hamilton DL, Trolier TK (1986). Stereotypes and stereotyping: An overview of the cognitive approach. In Davidio JF, Gaertner SL, eds.Prejudice, discrimination and racism. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ashmore RD, Del Boca FK (1986). Conceptual approaches to stereotypes and stereotyping. In Hamilton DL, ed.Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Taylor, SE. A categorization approach to stereotyping. In Hamilton, DL, ed.Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Linville PW, Salovey P, Fischer GW. Stereotyping and perceived distributions of social characteristics: An application to ingroup-outgroup perception. In Davidio JF, Gaertner SL, eds.Prejudice, discrimination and racism. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Klein D, Najman J, Kohrman AF, Munro C. Patient characteristics that elicit negative responses from family physicians.J Fam Prac 1982; 14(5): 881–888.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rosenberg S, Nelson C, Vivekananthan PS. A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions.J Person Soc Psychol 1968; 9: 283–294.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Schneider DJ. Implicit personality theory: A review.Psychol Bull 1973; 79: 294–309.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ashmore RD. Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory. In Hamilton DL, ed.Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sternbach RA, Wolf SR, Murphy RW, Akekson WH. Traits of pain patients: The low back “loser.” Psychosomatics 1973; 14: 226–229.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gentry WD, Shows WD, Thomas M. Chronic low back pain: A psychological profile.Psychosomatics 1974; 15: 173–177.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mooney V, Cairns D, Robertson J. A system for evaluating and treating chronic back disability.West J Med 1976; 124: 370–376.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Skerrit PW, Illness behavior and workers' compensation: Cause or effect? A psychiatric view.Psychiat Med 1987; 5(1): 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hamilton DL, Rose TL. Illusory correlation and the maintenance of stereotypic beliefs.J Personal Soc Psychol 1980; 39(5): 832–845.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hamilton, DL. Illusory correlation as a basis for stereotyping. In Hamilton DL, ed.Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rosenthal R, Johnson L.Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils intellectual development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Word CO, Zanna MP, Cooper J. The nonverbal mediation of self-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction.J Exp Soc Psychol 1974; 10: 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Niemeyer LO. The issue of abnormal illness behavior in work hardening. In Niemeyer LO, Jacobs K, eds.Work hardening—State of the art. Thorofare, New Jersey: Slack, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Najman JM, Klein D, Munro C. Patient characteristics negatively stereotyped by doctors.Soc Sci Med 1928; 16: 1781–1789.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Brink NE. The power struggle of workers' compensation—Strategies for intervention.J Appl Rehab Counsel 1989; 20(10): 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hazard, RG, Bendix A, Fenwick, JW. Disability exaggeration as a predictor of functional restoration outcomes for patients with chronic low-back pain.Spine 1991; 16(9): 1062–1067.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Gatchel RJ, Mayer TG, Capra P, Barnett J, Diamond P. Millon Behavioral Health Inventory: Its utility in predicting physical function in patients with low back pain.Arch Phys Med Rehab 1986; 67: 878–882.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Gatchel RJ, Mayer TG, Capra P, Diamond P, Barnett J. Quantification of lumbar function. Part 6: The use of psychological measures in guiding physical functional restoration.Spine 1986; 11: 36–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Brennan, AF, Barrett, CL, Garretson, HD. The prediction of chronic pain outcome by psychological variables.Int J Psychiat Med 1986–87; 16(4): 373–387.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Greenough CG, Fraser, RD. Comparison of eight psychometric instruments in unselected patients with back pain.Spine 1991; 16(9): 1068–1074.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Catchlove R, Cohen K. Effects of a directive return to work approach in the treatment of workman's compensation patients with chronic pain.Pain 1982; 14(2): 181–191.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hazard RG, Fenwick JW, Kalisch SM, Redmond J, Reeves V, Reid S, Frymoyer JW. Functional restoration with behavioral support: A one-year prospective study of patients with chronic low-back pain.Spine 1989; 14(2), 157–161.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Mayer H, Kishino ND, Keeley J, Mooney V, A prospective two-year study of functional restoration in industrial low back injury: An objective assessment procedure.JAMA 1987; 258(13): 1763–1767.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Frymoyer JW, Cats-Baril W. Predictors of low back pain disability.Clin Orthop 1987; 221: 89–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. McElligott J, Moscovich SJ, Fielding LP. Low back injury in industry: The value of a recovery program.Conn Med 1989; 53(12): 711–715.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Waddell, G. A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain.Spine 1987; 12(7): 632–644.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. OTR, CVE, Psychology Department, University of California, 92521, Riverside, California

    Linda Ogden Niemeyer

Authors
  1. Linda Ogden Niemeyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niemeyer, L.O. Social labeling, stereotyping, and observer bias in workers' compensation: The impact of provider-patient interaction on outcome. J Occup Rehab 1, 251–269 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073691

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073691

Key Words

Search

Navigation