Skip to main content
Log in

Iterated bootstrap with applications to frontier models

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The iterated bootstrap may be used to estimate errors which arise from a single pass of the bootstrap and thereby to correct for them. Here the iteration is employed to correct for coverage probability of confidence intervals obtained by a percentile method in the context of production frontier estimation with panel data. The parameter of interest is the maximum of the intercepts in a fixed firm effect model. The bootstrap distribution estimators are consistent if and only if there are no ties for this maximum. In the regular case (no ties), poor distribution estimators can result when the second largest intercept is close to the maximum. The iterated bootstrap is thus suggested to improve the accuracy of the obtained distributions. The result is illustrated in the analysis of labor efficiency of railway companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beran, R. (1987). “Prepivoting to reduce level error of confidence sets.”Biometrika 74, 457–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, A.C., Hinkley, D.V., and Schechtman. (1986). “Efficient bootstrap simulation.”Biometrika 73, 555–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M.J. (1957). “The measurement of production efficiency.”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 120, 253–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathon, H.J. and S. Perelman. (1990). “Measuring technical efficiency in national railways: A panel data approach.” Mimeo, Université de Liège, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, J.R. (1988). “Algorithms for balanced bootstrap simulations.”American Statisticians 42, 263–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (1986). “On the bootstrap and confidence intervals.”Annals of Statistics 14, 1431–1452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (1992).The Bootstrap and Edgeworth Expansion, New York/Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P., Härdle, W., and L. Simar. (1993). “On the inconsistency of bootstrap distribution estimators.”Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 16, 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. and M.A. Martin. (1988). “On bootstrap resampling and iteration.”Biometrika 75, 661–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loh, W.-Y. (1987). “Calibrating confidence coefficients.”Journal of the American Statistical Association 82, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, P. and R.E. Sickles. (1984). “Production frontiers and panel data.”Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2, 367–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simar, L. (1992). “Estimating efficiencies from frontier models with panel data: A comparison of parametric, nonparametric and semiparametric methods with bootstrapping.”The Journal of Productivity Analysis 3, 171–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.I.C. (1970–1983).Statistiques Internationales des Chemins de Fer, Union Internationale des Chemins de Fer, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported in part by grant No. 26 from the program “Pôle d'attraction interuniversitaire-Deuxième phase” to CORE and by the contract “Projet d'Actions de Recherche Concertées of the Belgian governement” (PARC) to the Institute of Statistics, Université Catholique de Louvain. The first author was partly financed by the Institut de Mathématiques Appliquées, Université Catholique de Louvain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hall, P., Härdle, W. & Simar, L. Iterated bootstrap with applications to frontier models. J Prod Anal 6, 63–76 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073495

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073495

Keywords

Navigation