Skip to main content
Log in

Detecting influential observations in data envelopment analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides diagnostic tools for examining the role of influential observations in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) applications. Observations may be prioritized for further scrutiny to see if they are contaminated by data errors; this prioritization is important in situations where data-checking is costly and resources are limited. Several empirical examples are provided using data from previously published studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aly, H.Y., R.G. Grabowski, C. Pasurka, and N. Rangan. (1990). “Technical, Scale, and Allocative Efficiencies in U.S. Banking: an Empirical Investigation.”Review of Economics and Statistics 72, 211–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, P., and N.C. Petersen. (1989). “A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis.” Unpublished working paper, Department of Management, Odense University, Odense, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D.F., and D. Pregibon. (1978). “Finding the Outliers that Matter.”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 40, 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J.F. Jr., and P.W. Wilson. (1993). “Technical Efficiency in VA Hospitals,” inThe Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications, (eds. Harold O. Fried, C.A. Knox Lovell, and Shelton S. Schmidt), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 335–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. (1981). “Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Follow Through.”Management Science 27, 668–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, and R.M. Thrall. (1986). “Identifying and Classifying Scale and Technical Efficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis.”Operations Research Letters 5, 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, and R.M. Thrall. (1991). “A Structure for Classifying and Characterizing Efficiency and Inefficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis.”Journal of Productivity Analysis 2, 197–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., S. Haag, P. Jaska, and J. Semple. (1992). “Sensitivity of Efficiency Classifications in the Additive Model of Data Envelopment Analysis.”International Journal of Systems Science 23, 789–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., and L. Neralić. (1990). Sensitivity Analysis of the Additive Model in Data Envelopment Analysis.”European Journal of Operational Research 48, 332–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S. and Hadi, A.S. (1986). “Influential Observations, High Leverage Points, and Outliers in Linear Regression.”Statistical Science, 1, 379–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R.D., and S. Weisberg. (1982).Residuals and Influence in Regression. New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deprins, D., L. Simar, and H. Tulkens. (1984). “Measuring Labor Inefficiency in Post Offices.” inThe Performance of Public Enterprises: Concepts and Measurements, (ed. M. Marchand, P. Pestieau, and H. Tulkens), Amsterdam: North-Holland, 243–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dusansky, R. and P.W. Wilson. (1994). “Measuring Efficiency in the Care of the Developmentally Disabled.”Review of Economics and Statistics 76, 340–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dusansky, R. and P.W. Wilson, (1995). “On the Relative Efficiency of Alternative Modes of Producing Public Sector Output: The Case of the Developmentally Disabled.”European Journal of Operational Research 80, 608–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, and C.A.K. Lovell. (1985).The Measurement of Efficiency of Production, Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, and C. Pasurka. (1986). “Effects on Relative Efficiency in Electric Power Generation Due to Environmental Controls.”Resources and Energy 8, 167–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J.B. (1988). “A Classification of Influence Measures.”Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 30, 159–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W.H. (1980). “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Econometric Frontier Functions.”Journal of Econometrics 13, 27–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosskopf, S., and V. Valdmanis. (1987). “Measuring Hospital Performance.”Journal of Health Economics 6, 89–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunst, R.F., and R.L. Mason. (1980).Regression Analysis and its Application. New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korostelev, A. P., L. Simar, and A. B. Tsybakov. (1994). “Efficient Estimation of Monotone Boundaries.”Annals of Statistics, forthcoming.

  • Lovell, C.A.K. (1993). “Production Frontiers and Productive Efficiency.” inThe Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications, (eds. H. Fried, C.A.K. Lovell, and S. Schmidt), Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, C.A.K., L.C. Walters, and L.L. Wood. (1993). “Stratified Models of Education Production Using DEA and Regression Analysis.” inData Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methods, and Applications, (eds. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, A.Y. Lewin, and L.M. Seiford). New York: Quorom Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.P. and J.M. Page. (1983). “The Impact of Subsidies on X-efficiency in LDC Industry: Theory and an Empirical Test.”Review of Economics and Statistics, 65, 608–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, T.A., and S. Yaisawarng. (1993). “Technical Efficiency in New Jersey School Districts.” inThe Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications, (eds. H. Fried, C.A.K. Lovell, and S. Schmidt), Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseeuw, P.J., and G.W. Bassett. (1991). “Robustness of the p-Subset Algorithm with High Breakdown Point.” inDirections in Robust Statistics and Diagnostics: Part II, (eds. W. Stahel and S. Weisberg), New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseeuw, P.J., and B.C. van Zomeren. (1990). “Unmasking Multivariate Outliers and Leverage Points,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 633–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaver, B.L., and K.P. Triantis. (1989). “The Implications of Using Messy Data to Estimate Production-Frontier-Based Technical Efficiency Measures.”Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 7, 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, T.R., R.H. Silkman, and A.J. Hogan. (1986). “Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions,” inMeasuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis, R.H. Silkman (ed.), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, Ronald W. (1970).Theory of Cost and Production Functions, Princeton: Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrall, R.M. (1993). “Duality, Classification, and Slacks in DEA.” Unpublished working paper, Jones Graduate School of Administration, Rice University.

  • Timmer, C.P. (1971). “Using a Probabilistic Frontier Production Function to Measure Technical Efficiency.”Journal of Political Economy 79, 776–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsch, R.E. (1982). “Influence Functions and Regression Diagnostics.” inModern Data Analysis, (ed. by R.L. Launer and A.F. Siegel). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G.W., and J.M. Jadlow. (1982). “Competition, Profit Incentives, and Technical Efficience in the Provision of Nuclear Medicine Services.”The Bell Journal of Economics 13, 472–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P.W. (1993). “Detecting Outliers in Deterministic Nonparametric Frontier Models with Multiple Outputs.”Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 11, 319–323.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was performed while under contract with the Management Science Group, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA 01730. Shawna Grosskopf and Richard Grabowski graciously provided data used in two of the empirical examples.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, P.W. Detecting influential observations in data envelopment analysis. J Prod Anal 6, 27–45 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073493

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073493

Keywords

Navigation