Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The syntax of English idioms: Can the dog be put on?

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An idiom is a collection of words whose meaning as a whole cannot be determined from the meanings of the individual words. As such, idioms pose a problem for the psychological process of interpretation, but psychologists have shown interpretation of idioms to be fast. A hallmark of idioms is their resistance to syntactic variation, and some idioms are more resistant than others. Idioms that are low in resistance are termedflexible, and they tend to be more familiar to users of the language, combinedr=.401, combinedp=.02. Some syntactic variations are moredisruptive than others are, and the disruptiveness of variations agrees well with a prediction by Fraser (1970), combinedr=.897,p<.01. Furthermore, 86% of the judgments of the acceptability of 41 idioms in 7 to 8 syntactic variations by 103 Harvard undergraduates agree with a strong proposal by Fraser (1970) that if a particular syntactic variation of an idiom is acceptable, then all relevant variations equally or more disruptive are also acceptable. The localization of the 14% disagreement in either competence or performance will have considerable implications for cognitive psychology and linguistics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boatner, M.T., Gates, J.E., & Makkai, A. (1984).A dictionary of American idioms (2nd ed.). Woodbury, New York: Barron's Educational Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafe, W.L. (1968). Idiomaticity as an anomaly in the Chomskyan paradigm.Foundations of Language, 4, 109–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A. (1982). Idioms: The colder the older.Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 317–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estill, R.B., & Kemper, S. (1982). Interpreting idioms.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 6, 559–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. (1970). Idioms within a transformational grammar.Foundations of Language, 6, 22–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R.W., Jr. (1980). Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation.Memory and Cognition, 8, 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R.W., Jr., & Gonzales, G.P. (1985). Syntactic frozenness in processing and remembering idioms.Cognition, 20, 243–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, A.L. (1983). The comprehension of idioms.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 12, 429–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, A. (1968). English idioms.Kivung, 1, 71–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemper, S. (1986). Inferential processing and the comprehension of idioms.Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 1, 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michiels, A. (1977). Idiomaticity in English.Revue des Langues Vivantes, 43, 184–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmeyer, F.J. (1972). The insertion of idioms. InPapers from the eighth regional meeting (pp. 294–302). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmeyer, F.J. (1974). The regularity of idiom behavior.Lingua, 34, 327–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A., Schallert, D.L., Reynolds, R.E., & Antos, S.J. (1978). Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effects of context on comprehension.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 465–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R.L. (1984).Essentials of behavioral research. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweigert, W.A. (1986). The comprehension of familiar and less familiar idioms.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinney, D.A., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 523–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasow, T., Sag, I.A., & Nunberg, G. (1984). Idioms: An interim report. InProceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Linguists (pp. 102–115). The Hague: CIPL.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Stanford University, 94305, Stanford, California

    Robert Timothy Reagan

Authors
  1. Robert Timothy Reagan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This research was funded in part by a graduate student research fund provided by the Department of Psychology, Harvard University. The article is a short version of the author's doctoral thesis with the same title. I am sincerely grateful to Keith Holyoak, Donna Jo Napoli, Miriam Schustack, and Roger Brown for their advice on various stages of experimental design. I am also grateful to Roger Brown, Monica Harris, Robert C. Crowder, Peter C. Gordon, Eliott Mordkowitz, and Elizabeth Weiss for helpful comments on earlier drafts. Douwe Yntema, Robert Rosenthal, and Don Rubin graciously provided helpful suggestions on data analysis for which I am also grateful.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reagan, R.T. The syntax of English idioms: Can the dog be put on?. J Psycholinguist Res 16, 417–441 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073271

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073271

Keywords

Search

Navigation