Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Justifications for the sharing of social science data

  • Adversary Forum
  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

Starting with the premise that voluntary sharing of social science data is a desirable professional behavior, this article discusses a variety of justifications for data sharing. These justifications are found to be grounded in the scientific process itself—in the need for science that is more accurate, more open, more knowledgeable, and has more resources at its disposal. Although it is evident that the costs and benefits of data sharing are now unevenly distributed, and that primary researchers currently bear most of the burden and risks, it is argued that the adoption of a data-sharing norm in the social sciences would go a long way to remedy the imbalance. In this regard, the author supports the 1985 data-sharing recommendations put forth by the Committee on National Statistics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychological Association (1981). Ethical principles of psychologists.American Psychologist, 36, 633–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazillion, R. J. (1984). The effect of access and privacy legislation on the conduct of scholarly research in Canada.Social Science Information Studies, 4, 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boruch, R. F., & Cordray, D. S. (1985). Professional codes and guidelines in data sharing. In S. E. Fienberg, M. E. Martin, & M. L. Straf (Eds.),Sharing research data (pp. 199–223) Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S., & Walker, E. (1983). Private archives and public needs.American Psychologist. 83, 414–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecil, J. S., & Griffin, E. (1985). The role of legal policies in data sharing. In S. E. Fienberg, M. E. Martin, & M. L. Straf (Eds.),Sharing research data (pp. 148–198). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clubb, J. M., Austin, E. W., Geda, C. L., & Traugott, M. W. (1985). Sharing research data in the social sciences. In S. E. Fienberg, M. E. Martin, & M. L. Straf (Eds.),Sharing research data (pp. 39–88) Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee for the Protection of Human Participants in Research. (1982).Ethical principles in the conduct of research with human participants. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on National Statistics. (1985). Report of the Committee on National Statistics: Issues and recommendations. In S. E. Fienberg, M. E. Martin, & M. L. Straf (Eds.),Sharing research data (pp. 39–88). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, L. A. (1983). In search of a scholar's privilege.Communications and the Law, 3–21.

  • Hedrick, T. E. (1985). Justifications for and obstacles to data sharing. In S. E. Fienberg, M. E. Martin, & M. L. Straf (Eds.),Sharing research data (pp. 123–147). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick, T. E., Boruch, R. F., & Ross, J. (1978). On ensuring the availability of evaluative data for secondary analysis.Policy Sciences, 9, 259–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, D. (1982). Intellectual property: The control of scientific informationScience, 216, 704–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. L., & Hedrick, T. E. (1983). The statutory protection of confidential research data: Synthesis and evaluation. In R. F. Boruch & J. S. Cecil (Eds.)Solutions to ethical and legal problems in social research (pp. 213–236). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, R. W. (1986).Research access to publicly collected data: A report based on a conference, November 21–22, 1985,Washington, D.C. New York: Committee on the Survey of Income and Program Participation, Social Science Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simitis, S. (1981). Data protection and research: A case study of control.American Journal of Comparative Law, 29, 583–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1986).Federal government information technology: Electronic record systems and individual privacy. (Report No. OTA-CIT-296). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolins, L. (1962). Responsibility for raw data.American Psychologist, 17, 657–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolins, L. (1978). Secondary analysis: In published research in the behavioral sciences. In R. E. Boruch (Ed.),New directions for program evaluation, 4, 45–55.

Download references

Authors
  1. Terry E. Hedrick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

U.S. General Accounting Office. The views expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily represent the opinions or policies of the GAO.

About this article

Cite this article

Hedrick, T.E. Justifications for the sharing of social science data. Law Hum Behav 12, 163–171 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073124

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073124

Keywords

Search

Navigation