Skip to main content
Log in

Conceptual similarity and the quality of metaphor in isolated sentences versus extended contexts

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many researchers have theorized or demonstrated a relationship between tenor and vehicle similarity and the judged quality of metaphors. In four experiments, each using different materials, the relationship between similarity and metaphoric quality was examined. Undergraduates in two different institutions rated: (1) the similarity of tenor and vehicle concepts, (2) the quality of metaphors in isolated, formulaic, sentences (the sort of materials used in previous experiments), or (3) the quality of the same metaphors in various extended, natural contexts. Average ratings of all three variables were determined for each metaphor. In all four experiments, similarity was highly positively correlated with the quality of metaphors in isolated, formulaic contexts, but similarity was either not correlated highly (Experiment 3) or not correlated at all (Experiment 1,2 & 4) with the quality of metaphors in extended, natural contexts. In three of the experiments, the quality of metaphors in isolated, formulaic sentences was not significantly correlated with the quality of metaphors in extended context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, M. H.A glossary of literary terms, 3rd ed.. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc., 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. E. The metaphor: A psychological inquiry. In R. Taguiri & L. Petrullo (Eds.),Person perception and interpersonal behavior. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1969 (Originally Published, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M.Models and metaphors. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, T. C. John Barleycorn lives.Atlantic, January 1979,243, 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C.The well wrought urn. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C. Metaphor, paradox, and stereotype.British Journal of Aesthetics, 1965,5, 315–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.Words and things. New York: The Free Press, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass. The M.I.T. Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, S. The blue hotel. InGreat short works of Stephan Crane. New York: Harper & Row, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deese, J.The structure of associations in language and thought. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillenbaum, S., & Rapoport, A.Structures in the subjective lexicon. New York: Academic Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, C. P.The yellow wallpaper. Boston: Small, Maynard, & Co., 1899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. J. Memory for literary metaphors.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1979,13, 246–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, D. L., & Verbrugge, R. R.Metaphor and the asymmetry of similarity. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, California, August 27, 1977.

  • Honeck, R. P., Voegtle, K., Dorfmueller, M. A., & Hoffman, R. R. Proverbs, meaning, and conceptual groups. In R. P. Honeck & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.),Cognition and figurative language. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. G., & Malgady, R. G. Toward a perceptual theory of metaphoric comprehension. In R. P. Honeck & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.),Cognition and figurative language. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koen, F. An intra-verbal explication of the nature of metaphor.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1965,4, 129–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, L. T. Similarity of affective meaning and the evaluation of metaphor.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1975,41, 787–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenberg, I. Truth and consequences of metaphors.Philosophy & Rhetoric, 1973,6, 30–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malgady, R. G., & Johnson, M. G. Modifiers in metaphors: Effects of constituent phrase similarity on the interpretation of figurative sentences.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1976,5, 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, A.A rhetoric of metaphor. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Virginia, 1980.

  • McNeill, D. A. A study of word associations.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1966,5, 548–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A.Beyound literal similarity. Technical Report No. 105, Champaign, Illinois: University of Illinois, October, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A. Beyond literal similarity.Psychological Review, 1979,86, 161–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A., Reynolds, R. E., Arter, J. A. Metaphor: Theoretical and empirical research.Psychological Bulletin, 1978,85, 919–943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A., Schallert, D. L., Reynolds, R. E., & Antos, S. J. Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effects of context on comprehension.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1978,17, 465–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, I. A.The philosophy of rhetoric. London: Oxford University Press, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P.The rule of metaphor (R. Czerny, with K. McLaughlin & J. Costello, translators), Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbeck, J.East of Eden. New York: Bantam Books, Inc., 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R., & Sternberg, R. J.Understanding and appreciating metaphors. NR150-412 ONR Technical Report # 11, New Haven: Department of Psychology, Yale University, 1978(a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R., & Sternberg, R. J.Aptness in metaphor. NR150-412 ONR Technical Report # 13, New Haven: Department of Psychology, Yale University, 1978(b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R., & Sternberg, R. J. Aptness in metaphor.Cognitive Psychology, 1981,13, 27–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. Features of similarity.Psychological Review, 1977,84, 327–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbrugge, R. R.The comprehension of analogy. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, May 1–3, 1975(a).

  • Verbrugge, R. R.Perceiving invariants at the invitation of metaphor. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, August 30, 1975(b).

  • Verbrugge, R. R. On metaphoric and metonymic modes of growth. In H. Gardner (Chair),Thinking with the left hand: Children's understanding of analogy and metaphor. Symposium presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, March 1977(a).

  • Verbrugge, R. R. Resemblances in language and perception. In R. E. Shaw & J. D. Bransford (Eds.),Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977(b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbrugge, R. R. Transformations in knowing: A realist view of metaphor. In R. P. Honeck & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.),Cognition and figurative language. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelwright, P.Metaphor and reality. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Experiments 1 and 2 of this study were part of a master's thesis completed at the University of Virginia, 1977. Experiment 3 was part of a doctoral dissertation completed at the University of Virginia. 1980.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCabe, A. Conceptual similarity and the quality of metaphor in isolated sentences versus extended contexts. J Psycholinguist Res 12, 41–68 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01072713

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01072713

Keywords

Navigation