Skip to main content
Log in

Elucidating the behavioral phenotype ofDrosophila melanogaster larvae: Correlations between larval foraging strategies and pupation height

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Larvae which demonstrated long trails covering a large area while feeding (rover foragers) pupated significantly higher than those covering a relatively small area and exhibiting short paths (sitter foragers). Pupation height and density of larvae per vial were positively correlated. Under the condition of equal larval density per vial,rovers were found to pupate significantly higher thansitter larval foragers. The effect of three light regimes (constant light, constant darkness, and 12 h light followed by 12 h dark) indicated a more complex relationship between pupation height and larval foraging behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez, G., Farina, J., and Fontdevila, A. (1979). Density and frequency-dependent selection on the singed locus ofDrosophila melanogaster.Genetica 50(3):161–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, K. (1961). An analysis of factors which determine success in competition for food among larvae ofDrosophila melanogaster.Arch. Neerl. Zool. XIV:200–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J. S. F. (1971). Ecological differences and competitive interaction betweenDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans in small laboratory populations.Oecologia 8:139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, M., Burnet, B., Farrow, R., and Woods, R. A. (1977). Mutual facilitation between larvae of the sibling speciesDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans.Evolution 31:824–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnet, B., Sewell, D., and Bos, M. (1977). Genetic analysis of larval feeding behavior inDrosophila melanogaster. II. Growth relations and competition between selected lines.Genet. Res. Cambr. 30:149–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawood, M. M., and Strickberger, M. W. (1964). The effect of larval interaction on viability inDrosophila melanogaster. I. Changes in heterozygosity.Genetics 50:999–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawood, M. M., and Strickberger, M. W. (1969). The effect of larval interaction on viability inDrosophila melanogaster. III. Effects of biotic residues.Genetics 63:201–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Souza, H. M. L., da Cunha, A. B., and dos Santos, E. P. (1970). Adaptive polymorphism of behavior evolved in laboratory populations ofDrosophila willstoni.Am. Nat. 104:175–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossfield, J. (1978). Non-sexual behavior of Drosophila. In Ashburner, M., and Wright, T. R. F. (eds.),The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 2b, New York, Academic Press, pp. 1–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoenigsberg, H. F. (1968). An ecological situation which produced a change in the proportion ofD. melanogaster toD. simulans.Am. Nat. 102:389–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. E. (1961). The influence of light on gene frequency changes in laboratory populations of ebony and non-ebonyDrosophila melanogaster.Genetics 46:1089–1095.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. P., and Barker, J. S. F. (1966). Polymorphism at the ebony locus ofDrosophila melanogaster and population fitness.Genetics 53:313–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawanishi, M., and Watanabe, T. K. (1978). Difference in photo-preferences as a cause of coexistence ofDrosophila simulans andD. melanogaster in nature.Jap. J. Genet. 53:209–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearsey, M. J., and Kojima, K. (1967). The genetic architecture of body weight and egg hatchability inDrosophila melanogaster.Genetics 56:23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markow, T. A. (1979). A survey of intra- and interspecific variation for pupation height inDrosophila.Behav. Genet. 9:209–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheson, A. C., and Parsons, P. A. (1975). Long-term exposure to CO2 inDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans, using isofemale strains from natural populations.Am. Nat. 109:593–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mensua, J. L. (1967). Some factors affecting pupation height ofDrosophila.Dros. Inform. Serv. 42:76.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, C. E. (1962). Population ecology of the common species ofDrosophila in Indiana.J. Econ. Entomol. 55:978–980.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, J. A., and McKechnie, S. W. (1979). A comparative study of resource utilization in natural populations ofDrosophila melanogaster andD. simulans.Oecologia 40:299–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishima, J. (1964). The competition amongDrosophila larvae in different growth stages.Res. Pop. Ecol. 6:22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moree, R. (1952). Experimental measurement of the relative viability of the mutant ebony inDrosophila melanogaster.Am. Nat. 86:45–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moth, J. J., and Barker, J. S. F. (1977). Interspecific competition betweenDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans: Effects of adult density on adult viability.Genetics 47:203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnishi, S. (1979). Relationship between larval feeding behavior and viability inDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans.Behav. Genet. 9:129–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P. A. (1975). The comparative evolutionary biology of the sibling speciesDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans.Q. Rev. Biol. 50:151–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sameoto, D. D., and Miller, R. S. (1968). Selection of pupation site byDrosophila melanogaster andD. simulans.Ecology 49:177–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, D., Burnet, B., and Connolly, K. (1975). Genetic analysis of larval feeding behavior inDrosophila melanogaster.Genet. Res. Cambr. 24:163–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, R. (1969).Biometry, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., Ehrlich, P. R., Hunter, P. E., and Schlager, G. (1960). Some factors affecting pupation site ofDrosophila.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 53:174–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski, M. B. (1980). Foraging strategies ofDrosophila melanogaster: A chromosomal analysis.Behav. Genet. 10:291–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski, M. B. (1981).Evolutionary Strategies in Drosophila:Genetic Analyses, Doctoral thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski, M. B. (1982a).Drosophila larval foraging behavior: Digging.Anim. Behav. 30:1252–1253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski, M. B. (1982b).Rover andsitter larval foraging patterns in a natural population ofD. melanogaster.Dros. Inform. Serv. 58:138–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski, M. B. (1982c). Temporal patterning of foraging behavior inD. melanogaster larvae.Dros. Inform. Serv. 58:139–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski, M. B., and Hansell, R. I. C. (1983).Drosophila larval foraging behavior. I. The sibling species,Drosophila melanogaster andD. simulans.Behav. Genet. 13:159–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski, M. B., Hansell, R. I. C., and Rotin, D. (1983).Drosophila larval foraging behavior. II. Selection in the sibling speciesDrosophila melanogaster andD. simulans.Behav. Genet. 13:169–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tantaway, A. O., and Soliman, M. H. (1967). Studies on natural populations ofDrosophila. IV. Competition betweenDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans.Evolution 21:34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrot, R. D. (1966). Genotypic interactions among competing strains and species ofDrosophila.Genetics 53:427–435.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by an NSERC Graduate Fellowship and University of Toronto Open Fellowship to M. B. Sokolowski and NSERC Operating Grant N505 to R. I. C. Hansell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sokolowski, M.B., Hansell, R.I.C. Elucidating the behavioral phenotype ofDrosophila melanogaster larvae: Correlations between larval foraging strategies and pupation height. Behav Genet 13, 267–280 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01071872

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01071872

Key Words

Navigation