Skip to main content
Log in

A model of developmental change in hierarchical phenotypes with application to specific cognitive abilities

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A hierarchical longitudinal path model is described for analysis of twin and sibling data. The model combines multivariate and longitudinal methodologies for assessment of continuity and change in the relationships among characters over time. Additionally, the model permits assessment of shared and independent etiologies for groups of measures at single and multiple occasions. The procedure is illustrated by application to specific cognitive ability data from 103 adopted and 109 nonadopted sibling pairs at ages 3, 4, 7, and 9 years, and 50 pairs of monozygotic and dizygotic twins at ages 3 and 4 years. The results suggest that much of the observed continuity in general intelligence measures is attributable to genetic influences common to specific abilities and indicate differential etiologies for specific abilities at different occasions in childhood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, T. W. (1960). Some stochastic process models for intelligence test scores. In Arrow, K., Karlin, S., and Suppes, P. (eds.),Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 205–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma, D. I., and Molenaar, P. C. M. (1987). The genetic analysis of repeated measures.Behav. Genet. 17:111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, C. (1949). Alternative methods of factor analysis and their relations to Pearson's method of principal axes.Br. J. Psychol. Stat. 2:98–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardon, L. R. (1992).Multivariate Path Analysis of Specific Cognitive Abilities in the Colorado Adoption Project, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardon, L. R., Corley, R. P., DeFries, J. C., and Plomin, R. (1992a). Factorial validation of a telephone test battery of specific cognitive abilities.Personal. Indiv. Differ. 13:1047–1050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardon, L. R., Fulker, D. W., DeFries, J. C., and Plomin, R. (1992b). Multivariate genetic analysis of specific cognitive abilities in the Colorado Adoption Project at age 7.Intelligence 16:383–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyphers, L., Fulker, D. W., Plomin, R. and DeFries, J. C. (1989). Cognitive abilities in the early school years: No effects of shared environment between parents and offspring.Intelligence 13:369–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, J. C., Plomin, R., Vandenberg, S. G., and Kuse, A. R. (1981). Parent-offspring resemblance for cognitive abilities in the Colorado Adoption Project: Biological, adoptive, and control parents and one-year-old children.Intelligence 5:245–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, L. J., Long, J., and Heath, A. C. (1986). A theory of developmental change in quantitative phenotypes applied to cognitive development.Behav. Genet. 16:143–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D. S. (1981).Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 2nd ed., Longman Group, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, H. E. (1946). A developmental theory of intelligence.Am. Psychol. 1:372–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The radex. In Lazarsfeld, P. F., (ed.),Mathematical Thinking in the Social Sciences, Free Press, Glencoe, IL, pp. 258–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, J. K., Eaves, L. J., Neale, M. C., and Meyer, J. M. (1988). Resolving causes of developmental continuity or “tracking.” I. Longitudinal twin studies during growth.Behav. Genet. 18:133–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, L. G. (1985). General intelligence: An integration of factor, test, and simplex theory. In Wolman, B. B. (ed.),Handbook of Intelligence: Theories, Measurement, and Applications, Wiley, New York, pp. 201–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, L. G. (1989). The first factor extracted is an unreliable estimate of “g”: The case of discrimination reaction time.Intelligence 13:183–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., and Sörbom, D. (1989).LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications, 2nd ed., SPSS, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendler, K. S., Heath, A. C., Martin, N. G., and Eaves, L. J. (1987). Symptoms of anxiety and symptoms of depression: Same genes, different environments?Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 44:451–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, J., and Plomin, R. (1987). Testing specific cognitive abilities by telephone and mail.Intelligence 11:391–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, K., Westlake, J., and Spence, M. A. (1976). Extensions to pedigree analysis. III. Variance components by the scoring method.Ann. Hum. Genet. 39:485–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArdle, J. J. (1986). Latent variable growth within behavior genetic models.Behav. Genet. 16:163–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArdle, J. J., and Goldsmith, H. H. (1990). Alternative common-factor models for multivariate biometric analyses.Behav. Genet. 20:569–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAG (1990).The NAG Fortran Library Manual, Mark 14, Numerical Algorithms Group, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, M. C., and Cardon, L. R. (1992).Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families, Kluwer Academic, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, K., and Fulker, D. W. (1989). Quantitative genetic analysis of longitudinal trends in adoption designs with application to IQ in the Colorado Adoption Project.Behav. Genet. 19:621–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., and Fulker, D. W. (1988).Nature and Nurture During Infancy and Early Childhood, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, T., Corley, R., Fulker, D. W., and Plomin, R. (1986). The development and validation of a test battery measuring specific cognitive abilities in four-year-old children.Educ. Psychol. Measure. 46:699–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarr, S. (1989). Protecting general intelligence. In Linn, R. L. (ed.),Intelligence: Measurement, Theory, and Public Policy, University of Illinois Press, Chicago, pp. 74–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, J., and Leiman, J. (1957). The development of hierarchical factor solutions.Psychometrika 22:53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, S., Corley, R., Guiffrida, C., and Plomin, R. (1984). The development and validation of a test battery to measure differentiated cognitive abilities in three-year-old children.Educ. Psychol. Measure. 49:703–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1904). General intelligence objectively determined and measured.Am. J. Psychol. 15:201–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1938).Primary Mental Abilities, University of Chicago, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, P. E. (1979).Intelligence: Heredity and Environment, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1974).Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised, Psychological Corp., New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cardon, L.R., Fulker, D.W. A model of developmental change in hierarchical phenotypes with application to specific cognitive abilities. Behav Genet 24, 1–16 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067924

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067924

Key words

Navigation