Skip to main content
Log in

Resolving causes of developmental continuity or “tracking.” I. Longitudinal twin studies during growth

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Models of developmental continuity and change in quantitative phenotypes may be tested using longitudinal data from twins. We illustrate a procedure for establishing the power and required sample sizes for detecting developmental transmission against an alternative common-factor hypothesis. We explore the general effects of different heritabilities, different fidelities of environmental and genetic developmental transmission, and varying numbers of occasions of measurement. In addition, a constraint of wide application is postulated for the action of the environment; either environmental effects are transmitted (learned) and occasion specific or they exert a constant influence which is not transmitted (learned). While the situations we examine are necessarily restricted here, our explorations of power show that, providing that we measure on at least four occasions, it is easy to detect developmental transmission with workable sample sizes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boomsma, D. T., and Molenaar, C. M. (1987). Genetic analysis of repeated measures. I. Simplex models.Behav. Genet. 17:111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, L. J., Kendler, K. S., and Schulz, S. C. (1986a). The familial sporadic classification: Its power for the resolution of genetic and environmental etiological factors.J. Psychiat. Res. 20:115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, L. J., Long J., and Heath, A. C. (1986b). A theory of developmental change in quantitative phenotypes applied to cognitive development.Behav. Genet. 16:143–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredericksen, C. H., and Rotondo, J. H. (1979). Time-series models and the study of longitudinal change. In Nesselroade, J. R., and Baltes, P. B. (eds.),Longitudinal Research in the Study of Behavior and Development, Academic Press, New York, pp. 111–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlan, W. R., Oberman, A., Mitchel, R. E., and Graybiel, A. (1973). A 30 year study of blood pressur in a white male cohort. In Onesti, G., Kim, K. E., and Moyer, J. H. (eds.),Hypertension: Mechanisms and Management, Grove and Stratton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A. C., and Eaves, L. J. (1986). Research strategies for the resolution of developmental genetic models. Abstract for Fifth International Congress on Twin Studies, Amsterdam.

  • Hewitt, J. K., and Heath, A. C. (1988). A note on computing the chi-square noncentrality parameter for power analyses.Behav. Genet. 18:105–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, J. K., Carroll, D., Sims, J., and Eaves, L. J. (1988). A developmental hypothesis for adult blood pressure.Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. (in press).

  • Hilton, T. L. (1969).Growth Study Annotated Bibliography, Progress Report 69-11, Educational Testing Serives, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. G. (1974). Analyzing psychological data by structural analysis of covariance matrices. In Krantz, D. H., Atkinson, R. C., Luce, R. D., and Suppes, P. (eds.),Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology, Vol. II. Measurement, Psychophysics, and Neural Information Processing, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. G., and Sorbom, D. (1984).LISREL VI User's Guide, Scientific Software, Mooresville, Ind.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, N. G., Eaves, L. J., Kearsey, M. J., and Davies, P. (1978). The power of the classical twin study.Heredity 40:97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArdle, J. J. (1986). Latent variable growth within behavior genetic models.Behav. Genet. 16:163–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesselroade, J. R., and Baltes, P. B. (eds.) (1979).Longitudinal Research in the Study of Behavior and Development, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, E. S., and Hartley, H. O. (eds.) (1972).Biometrika Tables for Statisticians, Vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Province, M. A., and Rao, D. C. (1985). A new model for the resolution of cultural and biological inheritance in the presence of temporal trends: Applications to systolic blood pressure.Genet. Epidemiol. 2:363–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogosa, D. R., and Willett, J. B. (1985). Understanding correlates of change by modelling individual differences in growth.Psychometrika 50:203–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1985).SAS User's Guide: Basics, Version 5 edition, SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattorra, A., and Saris, W. E. (1985). Power of the likelihood ratio test in covariance structure analysis.Psychometrika 50:83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneiderman, C., Heyden, S., Heiss, G., Tyroler, H., and Hames, C. (1976). Predictors of blood pressure over a 16 year follow-up of 163 youths.Circulation (Suppl. 2)54:11–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported in part by Grants AG04954, MH40828, GM30250, AA06781, and HL31010 from the National Institutes of Health.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hewitt, J.K., Eaves, L.J., Neale, M.C. et al. Resolving causes of developmental continuity or “tracking.” I. Longitudinal twin studies during growth. Behav Genet 18, 133–151 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067836

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067836

Key Words

Navigation