Abstract
This research investigated the lexical properties underlying comprehension that a word represents fact or opinion. In Experiment 1 subjects reliably identified words as either fact or opinion. Bivariate correlations and multiple regression showed that fact/opinion judgments were predicted primarily by ratings of the ease of verifiability of a word's referent and secondarily by the word's literalness, but not by several other lexical attributes: abstractness-concreteness, vagueness-preciseness, and evaluation. Experiment 2 extended the results of the first experiment to an implicit fact/opinion judgment, i.e., the identification of headlines as originating from a newspaper's front page (presumably based primarily upon fact) or from the editorial page (presumably based upon opinion). The headline judgments, also made reliably by subjects, were predicted by the same variables found significant in the first experiment, i.e., by verifiability and literalness, but not by the other lexical properties. Thus, the results of both experiments indicate that the identification of a word as representing fact or opinion is rooted in a word's verifiability and literalness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aristotle (1952).The works of Aristotle (Vol. 2). In W. D. Ross (Ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Original work published c. 300 B.C.).
Ashby, R. W. (1967). Verifiability principle. In P. Edwards,Encyclopedia of philosophy (Vol. 8). New York: MacMillan and Free Press.
Austin, J. L. (1962).How to do things with words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bach, K., & Harnish, R. (1979).Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.
Baldinger, K. (1980).Semantic Theory. New York: St. Martins Press.
Beardsley, M. (1975).Thinking straight. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Christie, G. (1964). Vagueness and legal language.Minnesota Law Review, 48.
Clark, H. H., & Clark, E. V. (1977).Psychology and language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Fearnside, W., & Hothes, W. (1959).Fallacy: The counterfeit of argument. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Herrmann, D. J. (1978). An old problem for the new psychosemantics: Synonymity.Psychological Bulletin, 85, 490–512.
Hill, A. (1976). Defamation and privacy under the first amendment.Columbia Law Review, 76, 1206–1311.
Kaplan, S. A. (1981). Fact and opinion afterGertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.. The evolution of a privilege.Rutgers Law Review, 34, 81–127.
Kucera, J., & Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day american english. Providence, Rhode Island: Brown University Press.
Lyons, J. (1977).Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press.
Moore, M. (1981). The semantics of judging.Southern California Law Review, 54.
Ogden, C. K., & Richards, I. A. (1923).The meaning of meaning. New York: Harcourt Brace and World.
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957).The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Paivio, A. (1968). A factor-analytic study of word attributes and verbal learning.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 41–49.
Quine, W., & Ullian, J. (1970).The web of belief. New York: Random House.
Rubin, D. C. (1980). 51 properties of 125 words: A unit analysis of verbal behavior.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 736–755.
Sack, R. (1980).Libel, slander and related problems. New York: Practicing Law Institute.
Schauer, F. F. (1978). Language, truth and the first amendment: An essay in memory of Harry Canter.Virginia Law Review, 64, 262–302.
Searle, J. R. (1969).Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stevenson, C. (1963).Facts and values. Westport: Greenwood Press.
Taylor, I. (1976).Introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Wilson, D. (1967).Language and the pursuit of truth. London: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors thank Peter Barnard, Roger Chaffin, Leslie Levin, and Steve Zecker for their helpful comments during the writing of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hermann, D.J., Rubenfeld, L.S. Lexical representation of fact and opinion. J Psycholinguist Res 14, 81–95 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067476
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067476