Skip to main content
Log in

Familiar idiom comprehension

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sentences containing idioms used either literally or figuratively were presented repeatedly for 100 msec per presentation. Half of the sentences were preceded by a paragraph. The number of presentations required to read the sentences and cued recall of the sentences were recorded. The serial brief presentations method provided predictable and meaningful results. Sentences containing idioms used literally required more presentations than those containing idioms used figuratively. Cued recall was better for idioms used literally than for those used figuratively. These results are interpreted as support for the Idiomatic Processing Model of idiom comprehension, which suggests that the figurative meaning is processed first; only if that one is inappropriate is the literal meaning processed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bobrow, S., & Bell, S. (1973). On catching on to idiomatic expressions.Memory and Cognition, 1, 343–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H.H., & Clark, E.V. (1977).Psychology and language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estill, R.B., & Kemper, S. (1982). Interpreting idioms.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 11, 559–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R.W. (1980). Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation.Memory and Cognition, 8, 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, A.L. (1983). The comprehension of idioms.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 12, 429–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempler, d., Van Lancker, D., & Read, S. (1986).Proverb and idiom comprehension in Alzheimer's disease. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Ortony, A., Schallert, D.L., Reynolds, R.E., & Antos, S.J. (1978). Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effects of context on comprehension.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 465–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reicher, G.M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus materials.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 275–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweigert, W.A. (1986a). Idiom comprehension and its relation to lexical ambiguity (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio University, 1985).Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 1308B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweigert, W.A. (1986b). The comprehension of familiar and less familiar idioms.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinney, D.A., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 523–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lancker, D.R., & Kempler, D. (1987). Comprehension of familiar phrases by left-but not by right-hemisphere damaged patients.Brain and Language 32, 265–277.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schweigert, W.A., Moates, D.R. Familiar idiom comprehension. J Psycholinguist Res 17, 281–296 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067198

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067198

Keywords

Navigation