Abstract
Subjects detected a brief near-threshold tone while encoding two-clause sentences for later report. The objective tone locations were at the end of the first clause, at the beginning of the second clause, or in the clause boundary. The effects of intensity variations of the speech signal were assessed by having subjects detect the tones in the same speech stimuli played backward. Tones at the end of a clause are relatively harder to detect than in other positions, comparing forward and backward speech. This supports the view that listeners are preoccupied with internal processes at the end of a clause.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, R., and Bever, T. G. (1969). Syntactic structure modifies attention during speech perception and recognition.Quart. J. Exptl. Psychol. 21:280–290.
Bever, T. G., Lackner, J., and Kirk, R. (1969). The underlying structures of sentences are the primary units of immediate speech processing.Perception Psychol. 5(4:225–234.
Clark, H. (1973). The language-as-fixed effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 12: No. 4.
Gourevitch, V., and Galanter, E. (1967). A significance test for one parameter isosensitivity functions.Psychometrika 32(1):23–33.
Luce, D. (1963). Detection and recognition. In Luce, D., Bush, R., and Galanter, E. (eds.),Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 1 Wiley, New York, p. 149.
Oller, D. K. (1971). The duration of speech segments: The effect of position-in-utterance and word length. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas.
Seitz, M. R. (1972). Behavioral and electrophysiological indicators of the reception of clicks superimposed on sentences. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.
Streeter, L. A., and Bever, T. G. (1974). Some effects of syntactic structure on reaction time to linguistic and non-linguistic stimuli.Memory Cogn. (in press).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by OE-C-72-1403 to Columbia University. The authors are indebted to A. Handel for research assistance.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bever, T.G., Hurtig, R.R. Detection of a nonlinguistic stimulus is poorest at the end of a clause. J Psycholinguist Res 4, 1–7 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066985
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066985