Abstract
Parameters of quantitative genetic models have traditionally been estimated by either algebraic manipulation of familial correlations (or familial mean squares), biometric model fitting, or multiple-group covariance structure analysis. With few exceptions, researchers who have used these methods for the analysis of twin data have assumed that their data were multinormal and, consequently, have used normal-theory estimation methods. It is shown that normal-theory methods produce biased genetic and environmental parameter estimates when data are censored. Specifically, with censored data, (1) normal-theory estimates of narrowsense heritability are either positively or negatively biased, whereas (2) estimates of shared-familial environmental variance are always biased downward. An alternative method for estimating genetic and environmental parameters from censored twin data is proposed. The method is called genetic Tobit factor analysis (GTFA) and is an extension of the Tobit factor analysis model developed by Muthén (Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 42, 241–250, 1989). Using a Monte Carlo design, the performance of GTFA is compared to traditional quantitative genetic methods in both large and small data sets. The results of this study suggest that GTFA is the preferred method for the genetic modeling of censored data obtained from twins.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mather, K. (1949).Biometrical Genetics: The Study of Continuous Variation, Dover Publications Inc., Dover.
Mather, K., and Jinks, J. L. (1982).Biometrical Genetics, 3rd ed., Chapman and Hall, London.
Muthén, B. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators.Psychometrika 49:115–132.
Muthén, B. (1987a).LISCOMP. Analysis of Linear Structural Equations with a Comprehensive Measurement Model, User's Guide, Scientific Software, Mooresville, IN.
Muthén, B. (1987b). Multiple-group structural modeling with non-normal continuous variables. Presented at the American Statistical Association meeting in Philadelphia, PA (1984).
Muthén, B. (1989a). Tobit factor analysis.Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 42:241–250.
Muthén, B. (1989b). Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations.Psychometrika 54:557–585.
Muthén, B. (1990). Moments of the censored and truncated bivariate normal distribution.Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 43:131–143.
Muthén, B., and Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables.Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 38:171–189.
Neale, M. C. (1991). MX Statistical Modeling, Unpublished program manual.
Neale, M. C., and Martin, N. G. (1989). The effects of age, sex, and genotype on selfreport drunkenness following a challenge dose of alcohol.Behav. Genet. 19:63–78.
Neale, M. C., Heath, A. C., Hewitt, J. K., Eaves, L. J., and Fulker, D. W. (1989). Fitting genetic models with LISREL: Hypothesis testing.Behav. Genet. 19:37–49.
Olsson, U. (1979a). On the robustness of factor analysis against crude classification of the observations.Multivar. Behav. Res. 14:485–500.
Olsson, U. (1979b). Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient.Psychometrika 44:443–460.
Olsson, U., Drasgow, F., and Dorans, N. J. (1982). The polyserial correlation coefficient.Psychometrika 47:337–347.
Peters, C. C., and Van Voorhis, W. R. (1940).Statistical Procedures and Their Mathematical Bases McGraw-Hill, New York.
Plomin, R., and Daniels, D. (1987). Why are children in the same family so different from one another?Behav. Brain Sci. 10:1–59.
Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimensions of a model.Ann. Stat. 6:461–464.
Tanaka, J. S. (1984).Some Results on the Estimation of Covariance Structure Models, PhD. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
Tanaka, J. S. (1987). “How big is big enough?”: Sample size and goodness of fit in structural equation models with latent variables.Child Dev. 58:134–146.
Tellegen, A., Lykken, D. T., Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Wilcox, K. J., Segal, N. L., and Rich, S. (1988). Personality similarity in twins reared apart and together.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 54:1031–1039.
Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables.Econometric 26:24–36.
Tukey, J. W., and McLaughlin, D. H. (1963). Less vulnerable confidence and significance procedures for location based on a single sample: Trimming/Winsorization.Indian J. Stat. 25:331–351.
Wainer, H., and Thissen, D. (1976). Three steps toward robust regression.Psychometrika 41:9–34.
Waller, N. G., Kojetin, B. A., Bouchard, T. J., Lykken, D. T., and Tellegen, A. (1989). Genetic and environmental influences on religious interests, attitudes, and values: A study of twins reared apart and together.Psychol. Sci. 1:138–142.
Waller, N. G., Lykken, D. T., and Tellegen, A. (1990). occupational interests, leisure time interests and personality: Three domains or one? Findings from the Minnesota Twin Registry. In Dawis, R. V., and Lubinski, D. (eds.),Assessing Individual Differences in Human Behavior: New Methods, Concepts and Findings, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Waller, N.G., Muthén, B.O. Genetic tobit factor analysis: Quantitative genetic modeling with censored data. Behav Genet 22, 265–292 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066662
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066662