Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of completing rape and assault

  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Is rape unique in terms of the factors which transform an attempt into a completion? Or is rape similar to other forms of assaultive violence? These questions are addressed here by employing the National Crime Survey to develop models of attempted versus completed rape, assault on females, and assault on males. Logistic equations predicting each type of victimization are estimated and compared. The analysis shows that rape victimization is unique. Additionally, the differences between attempted versus completed rape and assault cannot be accounted for by the sex of the victim or the sex of the assailant. The implications of these findings for theories of rape and assault are discussed. The policy implications of these findings are briefly considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bart, P. B. (1981). A study of women who both were raped and avoided rape.J. Soc. Issues 37: 123–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biderman, A. (1970).Time Distortions of Victimization Data and Mnemonic Effects, Bureau of Social Science Research, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohmer, C. (1977). Judicial attitudes toward rape victims, In Chappell, D., Geis, R., and Geis, G. (eds.),Forcible Rape: The Crime, the Victim, and the Offender, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownmiller, S. (1975).Against Our Will, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, A. W., and Holmstrom, L. L. (1979).Rape: Victims of Crises, Brady, Bowie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubow, R., McCabe, E., and Kaplan, G. (1979).Reactions to Crime: A Critical Review of the Literature, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, P. H. (1967).Criminal Victimization in the United States: A Report of a National Survey, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geis, G. (1977). Forcible rape: An introduction, In Chappell, D., Geis, R., and Geis, G. (eds.),Forcible Rape: The Crime, the Victim, and the Offender, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, S. (1979).Rape: The Power of Consciousness, Harper and Row, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groth, N. A., and Birnbaum, H. J. (1979).Men Who Rape: The Psychology of the Offender, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M. J., Gottfredson, M. R., and Garofalo, J. (1978).Victims of Personal Crime: An Empirical Foundation for a Theory of Personal Victimization, Ballinger, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (1978).National Crime Surveys Cities Attitude Sub-Sample 1972–1975, Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor, Mich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, S., and Mazur, M. A. (1979).Understanding the Rape Victim: A Synthesis of Research Findings, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J. P. (1976). The potential for crime over reporting in criminal victimization surveys.Criminology 14: 307–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizotte, A. J. (1985). The uniqueness of rape: Reporting assaultive violence to the police.Crime Delinq. 32: 169–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M., and Lafree, G. S. (1982). Sexual assault and its prosecution: A comparison with other crime.J. Crim. Law Criminal. 73: 1282–1305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerlove, M., and Press, S. J. (1973).Univariate and Multivariate Log-Linear and Logistic Models, Rand, Santa Monica, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, J., and Carlson, P. (1976). Problems with the use of regression analysis in prediction studies.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 13: 64–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D. (1975).The Politics of Rape, Stein and Day, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riger, S., and Gordon, M. T. (1981). The fear of rape: A study of social control.J. Soc. Issues 37: 71–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • San Jose Methods Test of Known Crime Victims (1972).Statistics Technical Report No. 1, National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Statistics Division, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, Washington, D.C.

  • Sagarin, E. (1977). Forcible rape and the problem of the rights of the accused, In Chappell, D., Geis, R., and Geis, G. (eds.),Forcible Rape: The Crime, the Victim, and the Offender, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubin, S. (1976). The victims of rape.Abbott Laboratories' Today in Psychiatry, Borland-Coogan Associates, Chicago, Vol. 2, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W. G. (1975). Measurement problems in official and survey crime rates.J. Crim. Just. 3: 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, S., and Scherl, B. (1970). Patterns of response among victims of rape.Am. J. Orthopsychiat. 40: 503–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. (1971).Principles of Econometrics, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E., and Holmes, K. A. (1981).The Second Assault: Rape and Public Attitudes, Greenwood Press, Westport, Conn.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lizotte, A.J. Determinants of completing rape and assault. J Quant Criminol 2, 203–217 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066526

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066526

Key words

Navigation