Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of primary vs. secondary toxicity of aroclor® 1254 to mink

  • Published:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dietary tests were conducted, using mink as a surrogate mammalian wildlife carnivore, to develop and evaluate procedures for the assessment of primary vs secondary toxicity of potentially hazardous chemicals to mammalian carnivores. Test methods included comparison of mortality, body weight change, feed consumption and calculated LC50 values in mink fed diets that contained polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs),i.e., Aroclor® 1254 (primary toxicity) with mink fed diets that contained the same concentrations of the metabolized xenobiotic (secondary toxicity). Mean feed consumption and body weight gains were lower for the mink fed the metabolized Aroclor 1254 (secondary toxicity) than for mink that received the same concentrations of Aroclor 1254. The tests yielded 28- and 35-day LC50 values of 79.0 and 48.5 ppm (mg/kg) for the primary toxicity test and 47.0 and 31.5 ppm (mg/kg) for the secondary toxicity test, respectively. The results indicated that mink were a suitable carnivorous species for secondary toxicity testing and showed the necessity of using a withdrawal period of appropriate duration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman NH, New AE, McConnell EE, Ferreil TL (1979) A spontaneous outbreak of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) toxicity in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta): Clinical observations. Lab Anim Sci29:661–665

    Google Scholar 

  • Aulerich RJ, Ringer RK (1977) Current status of PCB toxicity to mink and effects on their reproduction. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol6:279–292

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1979) Toxic effects of dietary polybrominated biphenyls on mink. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol8:487–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Aulerich RJ, Bursian SJ, Breslin WJ, Olson BA, Ringer RK (1985) Toxicological manifestations of 2,4,5,2′,4′,5′-, 2,3,6,2′,3′,6′-, and 3,4,5,3′,4′,5′-hexachlorobiphenyl and Aroclor 1254 in mink. J Toxicol Environ Health15:63–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell HB, Dimmick RW (1975) Hazards to predators feeding on prairie voles killed with zinc phosphide. J Wildl Manage39:816–819

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleavins MR, Aulerich RJ, Ringer RK (1980) Polychlorinated biphenyls (Aroclors 1016 and 1242): Effects on survival and reproduction in mink and ferrets. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol9:626–635

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1984) Effects of chronic dietary hexachlorobenzene exposure on the reproductive performance and survivability of mink and European ferrets. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol13:357–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull JO (1976) Laboratory and field investigations with difena-coum, a promising new rodenticide. Proc Vert Pest Conf7:72–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter JW, Mercer LP (1983a) Prediction of food intake, weight gain, and organ weights in rats as a function of dietary Aroclor 1254 (PCBs) by the saturation kinetics model for physiological responses. Nutr Rept Intern27:561–568

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1983b) Pair-feeding study of PCB (Aroclor 1254) toxicity in rats. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol31:686–691

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney KD, Putnam JP, Andrews JE (1978) Metabolic studies with TCDD (dioxin) treated rats. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol7:385–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans J, Hegdal PL, Griffiths RE Jr (1970) Methods of controlling jackrabbits. Proc Vert Pest Conf4:109–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans J, Ward AL (1967) Secondary poisoning associated with anticoagulant-killed nutria. J Am Vet Med Assoc151:856–861

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink RJ, Jaber MJ (1981) The laughing gull (Larus articilla) as a model for assessment of secondary poisoning. In: Lamb DW, Kenaga EE (eds) Avian and mammalian wildlife toxicology: Second conference, ASTM STP 757. Am Soc Testing Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp 61–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill JL (1978) Design and analysis of experiments in the animal and medical sciences Vol 1. Iowa State Univ Press, Ames, IA, 409 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegdal PL, Gatz TA (1976) Hazards to wildlife associated with underground strychnine baiting for pocket gophers. Proc Vert Pest Conf7:258–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegdal PL, Gatz TA, Fite EC (1981) Secondary effects of rodenticides on mammalian predators. In: Chapman JA, Pursley D (eds) Worldwide furbearer conference proceedings Voi III, Frostburg State College, Frostburg, MD, pp 1781–1793

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill EF, Mendenhall VM (1980) Secondary poisoning of barn owls with famphur, an organophosphate insecticide. J Wildl Manage44:676–681

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornshaw TC (1984) Development of dietary LC50 and reproduction test protocols using mink and ferrets as representative mammalian carnivores. PhD Thesis, Michigan State University, E Lansing, MI, 212 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornshaw TC, Aulerich RJ, Johnson HE (1983) Feeding Great Lakes fish to mink: Effects on mink and accumulation and elimination of PCBs by mink. J Toxicol Environ Health11:933–946

    Google Scholar 

  • Litchfield JT, Wilcoxon F (1949) A simplified method of evaluating dose-effect experiments. J Pharmacol Exptl Therap96:99–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendenhall VM, Pank LF (1980) Secondary poisoning of owls by anticoagulant rodenticides. Wildl Soc Bull8:311–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelssohn H, Paz U (1977) Mass mortality of birds of prey caused by Azodrin, an organophosphorous insecticide. Biol Conserv11:163–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Osweiler GD, Carson TL, Buck WB, Van Gelder GA (1985) Clinical and diagnostic veterinary toxicology, 3rd edn, Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, IA, 494 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Prier RF, Derse PH (1962) Evaluation of the hazard of secondary poisoning by warfarin-poisoned rodents, J Am Vet Med Assoc140:351–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringer RK, Hornshaw TC, Aulerich RJ (1986) Mammalian wildlife (mink and ferret) dietary LC50 test. In: Turner LW, Ringer RK (eds) Wildlife toxicology: Current status. Soc Environ Toxicol Chem, Pergamon Press, NY (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozman K (1984) Separation of wasting syndrome and lethality caused by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Toxicol Letters22:279–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Savarie PJ, Hayes DJ, McBride RT, Roberts JD (1979) Efficacy and safety of diphacinone as a predacide. In: Kenaga EE (ed) Avian and mammalian wildlife toxicology. Am Soc Testing Materials, Spec Tech Publ 693, Philadelphia, PA, pp 69–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Schitoskey F Jr (1975) Primary and secondary hazards of three rodenticides to kit fox. J Wildl Manage39:416–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Seefeld MD, Corbett SW, Keesey RE, Peterson RE (1984) Characterization of the wasting syndrome in rats treated with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol73:311–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend MG, Buryan PJ, Odam EM, Stanley PL Wardall HP (1984) Assessment of secondary poisoning hazard of warfarin to least weasels. J Wildl Manage48:628–632

    Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (1980) Analysis of pesticide residues in human and environmental samples. Watts RR (ed) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Health Effects Research Lab, Environmental Toxicology Division, Research Triangle Park, NC, Sec 5, A, (2), (2), (6), pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood JE (1965) Response of rodent populations to control. J Wildl Manage29:425–438

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by US Environmental Protection Agency Assistance AgreementCR-810785-01-0 but has not been subjected to review by EPA personnel and, therefore, does not necessarily reflect the views of that agency and no official endorsement should be inferred. Published with the approval of the Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station as Journal Article No. 11825.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aulerich, R.J., Ringer, R.K. & Safronoff, J. Assessment of primary vs. secondary toxicity of aroclor® 1254 to mink. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 15, 393–399 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066406

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066406

Keywords

Navigation