Skip to main content
Log in

Criminal justice decision making as a stratification process: The role of race and stratification resources in pretrial release

  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our purpose is to bridge the criminal justice and stratification research literatures and to pursue the argument that homologous structural principles stratify allocation processes across central institutions of American society. The principle observed here in the making of bail decisions, as in earlier studies of the allocation of earnings, is that stratification resources operate to the greater advantage of whites than blacks. The operation of this principle is established through the estimation of covariance structure models of pretrial release decisions affecting 5660 defendants in 10 federal courts. Education and income are treated in this study as observed components of a composite construct, stratification resources, which works to the greater advantage of whites. Prior record is also found to operate to the greater advantage of whites. Two further variables, dangerousness and community ties, increase bail severity among blacks and whites. While the effect of community ties has been legally legitimized since the Bail Reform Act of 1966, the effect of dangerousness was not so legitimized until the Bail Reform Act of 1984. However, because our data precede the latter act, they confirm that this act simply reinstitutionalized earlier practice. Meanwhile, our race-specific findings may explain why although this and earlier studies find negligible main effects of race on criminal justice outcomes, black Americans nonetheless perceive more criminal injustice than do whites. In the criminal justice system, as in other spheres of American society, whites receive a better return on their resources, but our findings that the statutory severity of the offense and dangerousness work to the relative disadvantage of white defendants challenges conflict and labeling theory's one-dimensional characterization of black defendant disadvantage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, G. M., Glass, P., Roberts, J., and Schurz, A. (1958). A study of the administration of bail in New York City.Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 106: 685–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ares, C., Rankin, A., and Sturz, H. (1966). The Manhattan Bail Project: An interim report on the use of pretrial parole.N.Y.U. Law Rev. 38: 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balbus, I. (1977). Commodity form and legal form: An essay on the “relative autonomy” of the law.Law Soc. Rev. 11: 571–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeley, A. (1927).The Bail System in Chicago, University of Chicago Press, Chicago (reprinted 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielby, W. T., Hauser, R. M., and Featherman, D. L. (1977). Response error of black and nonblack males in models of the intergenerational transmission of socioeconomic status.Am. J. Sociol. 82: 1242–1287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Martin, S., and Tonry, M. (1983).Research on Sentencing: The Search for Reform, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohannon, P. (1965). The differing realms of the law. In Nader, L. (ed.),Ethnography of Law, Special Publication, pp. 33–42.

  • Borman, P. (1971). The selling of preventive detention.Northwest. Law Rev. 65/66: 879–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bynum, T. (1977).An Empirical Exploration of the Factors Influencing Release on Recognizance, Ph.D dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S. H., Freeman, J. L., and Koch, G. C. (1976). Bail risk: A multivariate analysis.J. Legal Stud. 5: 341–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D. (1969). Inheritance of poverty or inheritance of wealth? In Moynihan, D. P. (ed.),Understanding Poverty, Basic, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabricant, M. (1969). Bail as a preferred freedom and the failures of New York's revision.Buffalo Law Rev. 18: 303–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farnworth, M., and Horan, P. (1980). Separate justice: An analysis of race differences in court processes.Soc. Sci. 9: 381–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherman, D. L., and Hauser, R. M. (1978).Opportunity and Change, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeley, M., and McNaughton, J. (1974).The Pre-Trial Process in the Sixth Circuit: A Quantitative and Legal Analysis, New Haven Pre-Trial Services, New Haven, Conn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote, C. (1954). Compelling appearance in court: Administration of bail in Philadelphia.Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 102: 1031–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote, C. (1959). The bail system and equal justice.Fed. Probat. 23: 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freed, D., and Wald, P. (1964). Bail in the United States: 1964. National Conference on Bail and Criminal, Washington, D.C.

  • Goldkamp, J. S. (1977).Bail Decisionmaking and the Role of Pretrial Decisionmaking in American Justice, Ph.D. dissertation, School of Criminal Justice, State University of New York at Albany, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldkamp, J. S. (1979).Two Classes of Accused: A Study of Bail and Detention in American Justice, Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldkamp, J. S. (1983). Questioning the practice of pretrial detention: Some empirical evidence from Philadelphia.J. Crim. Law Criminal. 74: 1556–1588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldkamp, J. S. (1985). Danger and detention: A second generation of bail reform.J. Crim. Law Criminal. 76: 1–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldkamp, J. S. (1987). Prediction in criminal justice policy development. In Gottfredson, D. M., and Tonry, M. (eds.),Classification and Prediction in Criminal Justice Decision. 9 Crime and Justice, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldkamp, J. S., Gottfredson, M. R., and Mitchel-Herzfeld, S. (1981).Bail Decision Making: A Study of Policy Guidelines, National Institute of Corrections, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldkamp, J. S., and Gottfredson, M. R. (1985).Policy Guidelines for Bail: An Experiment in Court Reform, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, D. C. (1981). Black-white differences in the educational attainment process: What have we learned?Am. Sociol. Rev. 46: 542–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J., and Albonetti, C. (1982). Race, class and the perception of criminal injustice in America.Am. J. Sociol. 88: 329–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J. and Bumiller, K. (1983). A review and critique of sentencing research. In Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Martin, S., and Tontry, M. (eds.),Research on Sentencing: The Search for Reform, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J., and Parker, P. (1985). White collar crime and punishment: The class structure and legal sanctioning of securities violations.Am. Sociol. Rev. 50: 302–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J., Nagel, I., and Albonetti, C. A., (1980). The differential sentencing of white collar offenders in ten federal district courts.Am. Sociol. Rev. 45: 802–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, F. (1971). Pre-trial detention and the 1970 D.C. Crime Act-The next step in bail reform.Brooklyn Law Rev. 37: 277–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hout, M. (1984). Occupational mobility of black men: 1962 to 1973.Am. Sociol. Rev. 49: 308–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, D. and Greenberg, D. (1984). Social control and social formation: A Marxian analysis. In Black, D. (ed.),Toward a General Theory of Social Control, Vol. II. Selected Problems, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. (1973). A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. In Goldberger, A., and Duncan, O. (eds.),Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences, Seminar Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K., and Sörbom, D. (1981a)LISREL—Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by the Method of Maximum Likelihood. User's Guide, Version V, National Educational Resources, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K., and Sörbom, D. (1982b). The use of LISREL in sociological model building. In Jackson, D. J., and Borgatta, E. F. (eds.),Factor Analysis and Measurement in Sociological Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, W. (1973). the bail system: An economic approach.J. Legal Stud. 2: 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, W. (1974). Legality and reality: Some evidence on criminal proceeding.J. Legal Stud. 3: 105–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizotte, A. (1978). Extra-legal factors in Chicago's criminal courts: Testing the conflict model of criminal justice.Soc. Problems 25: 564–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleck, G. (1981). Racial discrimination in criminal sentencing: A critical examination of the evidence with additional evidence on the death penalty.Am. Sociol Rev. 46: 783–805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miethe, T. D., and Moore, C. A. (1986). Racial differences in criminal processing: The consequences of model selection on conclusions about differential treatment.Sociol. Q. 27: 217–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. (1969). Bail reform and the constitutionality of pre-trial detention.Va. Law Rev. 55: 1223–1242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, W., and Beattie, R. (1932).Survey of the Administration of Criminal Justice in Oregon, University of Oregon, Eugene.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, I. (1983). The legal/extra-legal controversy: Judicial decisions on pretrial release.Law Soc. Rev. 17: 481–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P., Wake, E., Bose, C., and Berk, R. (1974). The seriousness of crime: Normative structure and individual differences.Am. Sociol. Rev. 39: 224–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, P. (1965). On the costs of being a negro.Sociol. Inquiry 35: 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, R., Nagel, I. H., and Hagan, J. (1983). Methodological issues in court research.Sociol. Methods Res. 11: 469–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. H. (1976).The Bail Reform in America, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribe, L. (1970). An ounce of detention: Preventive justice in the works of John Mitchell.Va. Law Rev. 56: 371–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. (1970). The effect of education on the earnings of blacks and whites.Rev. Econ. Stat. 52: 150–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S., Weisbord, D., and Bode, N. (1982). Sentencing the white collar offender: Rhetoric and reality.Am. Sociol. Rev. 47: 641–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wice, P. (1974).Freedom for Sale, Lexington Books, Lexington, Ky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R., and Thomson, E. (1983). Notes on the estimation of models with wife-husband data. Center of Demography and Ecology Working Paper 82-58, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

  • Wilson, W. J. (1978).The Declining Significance of Race, University of Chicago, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, E. O. (1978). Race, class and income inequality,Am. J. Sociol. 83: 1368–1397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yankerovich, Skelly, and White, Inc. (1977). The public image of the courts: A national survey of the general public, judges, lawyers, and community leaders. Unpublished report, National Criminal Justice Reference Service, Rockville, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Albonetti, C.A., Hauser, R.M., Hagan, J. et al. Criminal justice decision making as a stratification process: The role of race and stratification resources in pretrial release. J Quant Criminol 5, 57–82 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066261

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066261

Key words

Navigation