Abstract
Martin and Wilson (1982) describe two forms of sampling bias in twin studies. One is “hard selection,” where individuals above a threshold participate, and those below do not. The second is “soft selection,” where the probability of including a pair of relatives varies over the range of the character. We present an alternative model of soft selection which has strikingly different consequences for the resemblance between relatives. In general, the softer the threshold, the more the correlation resembles that in the underlying population. Results are presented where the probability of selection equals the cumulative distribution function of a normal distribution with 10% of the variance of the selected variable. In these circumstances, soft selection usually leads to less severely attenuated correlations than truncate selection.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Curnow, R. N., and Dunnett, C. W. (1962). The numerical evaluation of certain multivariate normal integrals.Ann. Math. Stat. 33:571–579.
Lykken, D. T., Tellegen, A., and De Rubeis, R. (1978). Volunteer bias in twin research; the rule of two-thirds,Soc. Biol. 25:1–9.
Lykken, D. T., McGue, M., and Tellegen, A. (1987). Recruitment bias in twin research: the rule of two-thirds reconsidered.Behav. Genet. 17: 343–362.
Martin, N. G., and Wilson, S. R. (1982). Bias in the estimation of heritability from truncated samples of twins.Behav. Gent. 12:467–472.
NAG (1984).Numerical Algorithms Group FORTRAN Library Manual, Mark 11, NAG, Oxford.
Rushton, J. P., Fulker, D. W., Neale, M. C., Blizard, R. A., and Eysenck, H. J. (1984). Altruism and genetics.Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. 33:265–271.
SAS (1985).SAS User's Guide: Basics, Version 5 Edition, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neale, M.C., Eaves, L.J., Kendler, K.S. et al. Bias in correlations from selected samples of relatives: The effects of soft selection. Behav Genet 19, 163–169 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065901
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065901