Skip to main content
Log in

Issues in the genetics of social behavior

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The genetics of social behavior presents special difficulties because the phenotype is the product of an interaction between two or more individuals. Social interactions are of two kinds: (1) cooperative, in which the probabilities of transmission of the genes of all participants are similarly affected by the outcome, and (2) agonistic, in which the probabilities for the participants are affected in opposite directions. The latter are of particular interest for evolutionary theory. Three major types of designs for measuring social behavior in genetic experiments are available: (1) homogeneous sets, (2) standard tester and (3) tester panel representing a reference population. The advantages and limitations of each method are discussed. Important areas for future development include the relationship of genetic and experiential factors in early life to social status as an adult and the extension of the genetic analysis of social behavior to natural populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allee, W. C. (1938).The Social Life of Animals, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, F. J. (1972). Frequency-dependent mating advantage inDrosophila.Behav. Genet. 2:85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruell, J. H. (1970). Behavioral population genetics and wildMus musculus. In Lindzey, G., and Thiessen, D. D. (eds.),Contributions to Behavior-Genetic Analysis: The Mouse as a Prototype. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp. 261–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, R. B. (1976). The ontogeny and phylogeny of social interactions. In Hahn, M. E., and Simmel, E. C. (eds.),Communicative Behavior and Evolution, Academic Press, New York, pp. 115–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, J. B. (1962). A “behavioral sink”. In Bliss, E. L. (ed.),Roots of Behavior, Harper, New York, pp. 295–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian, J. J. (1961). Phenomena associated with population density.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 47:428–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian, J. J. (1970). Social subordination, population density, and mammalian evolution.Science 168:84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, J. V., Ortman, L. L., and Guhl, A. M. (1965). Genetic selection for social dominance ability in chickens.Anim. Behav. 13:114–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, J. C., and McClearn, G. E. (1970). Social dominance and Darwinian fitness in the laboratory mouse.Am. Naturalist 104:408–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doner, R. D., Inman, C., and Davis, R. T. (1952). Competitive behavior between inbred strains of mice.Proc. S. Dakota Acad. Sci. 31:172–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D. S. (1960).Quantitative Genetics, Ronald Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, J. L., and Clark, L. D. (1968). Genotype and behavioral vulnerability to isolation in dogs.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 66:151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, B. E., and Allee, W. C. (1942). Some effects of conditioning on social dominance and subordination in inbred strains of mice.Physiol. Zool. 15:485–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, M. E. (1971). Social relationships and their development in two strains ofMus musculus.Diss. Abst. Int. 32:(1-B):585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, M. E., Haber, S. B., and Fuller, J. L. (1973). Differential agonistic behavior in three lines of mice selected for brain weight.Physiol. Behav. 10:759–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, H. F., and Harlow, M. K. (1966). Learning to love.Am. Scientist 54:244–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, N. D. (1970). Genetic influences on the behavior of mice can be obscured by laboratory rearing.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 72:505–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R. A. (1956). The biological significance of the territories of birds.Ibis 98:340–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagerspetz, K., and Raija, M. (1965). Simulation experiments on stimuli eliciting aggressive behavior in mice.Reports of the Psychology Institute, University of Turku, No. 13.

  • Lagerspetz, K., and Seija, T. (1967). Maturation of aggressive behavior in young mice.Reports from the Institute of Psychology, University of Turku, No. 28.

  • Manning, A. (1963). Selection of mating speed inDrosophila melanogaster based on behaviour of one sex.Anim. Behav. 11:116–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marler, P. H., and Hamilton, W. J. (1966).Mechanisms of Amimal Behavior, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride, G. (1958). The measurement of aggressiveness in the domestic hen.Anim. Behav. 6:87–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill, T. E. (1970). Genetic analysis of male sexual behavior. In Lindzey, G., and Thiessen, D. D. (eds.),Contributions to Behavior-Genetic Analysis: The Mouse as a Prototype, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp. 57–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P. A. (1967).The Genetic Analysis of Behaviour, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowski, A. A., and Scott, J. P. (1956). Heredity differences in the development of dominance in litters of puppies.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 49:353–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ropartz, P. (1968). The relation between olfactory stimulation and aggressive behaviour in mice.Anim. Behav. 16:97–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. P. (1958).Animal Behavior, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. P. (1966). Agonistic behavior of mice and rats: A review.Am. Zoologist 6:683–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. P., and Fuller, J. L. (1965).Genetics and the Social Behavior of the Dog, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selander, R. K., and Yang, S. Y. (1970). Biochemical genetics and behavior in wild house mouse populations. In Lindzey, G., and Thiessen, D. D. (eds.),Contributions to Behavior-Genetic Analysis: The Mouse as a Prototype, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp. 293–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwick, C. H., and Clark, L. H. (1968). Interstrain differences in aggressive behavior and exploratory activity of inbred mice.Commun. Behav. Biol. A(i):49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S. (1951). Mathematics, measurement and psychophysics. In Stevens, S. S. (ed.),Handbook of Experimental Psychology, Wiley, New York, pp. 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiessen, D. D. (1972). A move toward species-specific analyses in behavior genetics.Behav. Genet. 2:115–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, N. (1948). Social releasers and the experimental method required for their study.Wilson Bull. 60:6–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhrich, J. (1938). The social hierarchy in albino mice.J Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 25:373–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R. E., Hutchinson, R. R., and Azrin, N. H. (1965). Pain elicited aggression.Psychol. Rec. 15:111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vale, J. R., and Ray, D. (1972). A diallel analysis of male mouse sex behavior.Behav. Genet. 2:199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willems, E. P. (1969). Planning a rationale for naturalistic research. In Willems, E. P., and Rausch, H. L. (eds.),Naturalistic Viewpoints in Psychological Research, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 44–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood-Gush, D. M. G. (1958). Genetic and experimental factors affecting the libido of cockerels.Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 27:6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne-Edwards, V. C. (1962).Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behavior, Hafner, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by Grant GB 24827 from the National Science Foundation and Grants MH 22005 and MH 13058 from the National Institute of Mental Health.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fuller, J.L., Hahn, M.E. Issues in the genetics of social behavior. Behav Genet 6, 391–406 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065697

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065697

Key Words

Navigation