Abstract
Survey data from a national sample of homeless family shelters (N=59)were analyzed to describe the family support programming available to residents. Data were reported on facility and resident characteristics and family support programming, as well as on facility admission criteria and program participation requirements. Four independent variables (length of stay, shelter capacity, sponsorship, and program philosophy) were examined for their relationship to the family-oriented services offered. Facilities sheltered an average of 17 families, with a range of 2–200; the average length of stay for families was slightly over 5 months. Regarding family programming, services of an educational nature were more popular than those focused on providing support or therapy/intervention; services to parents to further adult development were more often offered than those either directed to parents in their parenting roles or to the family as a unit. Virtually all shelters (98%) applied eligibility criteria to families seeking admission. The most common reasons for exclusion were active drug (86%) and alcohol (83%) abuse by a family member; 40% also refused acceptance to families with adolescent males. Seventy-eight percent of facilities mandated participation in some support services. Smaller shelters operated with greater numbers of exclusions (¯x=5.98773; p<.05);larger shelters had higher percentages of mandatory family programming (¯x= 9.21823; p<.06).These findings shed light on shelter directors' beliefs about the etiology of family homelessness and proper steps to solve the problem.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Applebaum, R. P. (1989). Counting the homeless. In J. A. Momeni (Ed.),Homelessness in the United States, Volume II: Data and issues, (pp. 1–16). New York: Greenwood Press.
Bassuk, E. (1988). Redefining transitional housing for homeless families.Yale Law and Policy Review, 6, 309–330.
Bassuk, E., & Rosenberg, L. (1988). Why does family homelessness occur?: A case-control study.American Journal of Public Health, 78, 783–788.
Bassuk, E. L., & Rubin, L. (1987). Homeless children: A neglected population.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57, 279–286.
Bassuk, E., Rubin, L., & Lauriat, A. (1986). Characteristics of sheltered homeless families.American Journal of Public Health, 76, 1097–1101.
Boxill, N. (1988). Forming human connections on shelters for homeless women and children.Zero to Three, 2(89), 19–21.
Breakey, W. R., & Fischer, P. J. (1990). Homelessness: The extent of the problem.Journal of Social Issues, 46(4), 31–47.
Children and Youths: Report to Congressional Committees. (1989). Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office.
Children's Defense Fund (1989).A vision for America's future: An agenda for the 1990's, A children's defense budget. Washington, D.C.: Author.
Cleary, P. (1988). Social support: Conceptualization and measurement. In H. Weiss and F. Jacobs (Eds.),Evaluating family programs (pp. 195–216). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Davidson, C. (1989). Dependent Children and Their Families: An Historical Survey of United States Policies. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Kansas City, MO.
Dunst, C., & Trivette, C. (1988). Towards experimental evaluation of the family, infant, and preschool program. In H. Weiss and F. Jacobs (Eds.),Evaluating family programs (pp. 315–346). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Dunst, C., & Trivette, C. (1990). Assessment of social support in early intervention. In S. J. Meisels and J. P. Shonkoff (Eds.),Handbook of early childhood intervention (pp. 326–349). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dunst, C., Trivette, C., & Thompson, R. (1990). Supporting and strengthening family functioning: Towards a congruence between principles and practice.Prevention in Human Service, 9(1), 19–43.
Dym, B. (1988). Ecological perspectives on change in families. In H. Weiss and F. Jacobs (Eds.),Evaluating family programs (pp. 477–495). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Edelman, M. W., & Mihaly, L. (1989). Homeless families and the housing crisis in the United States.Children and Youth Services Review, 7(1), 91–108.
Fabricant, M. (1988). Empowering the homeless.Social Policy, 7, 49–55.
Garbarino, J. (1990). The human ecology of early risk. In S. J. Meisels and J. P. Shonkoff (Eds.),Handbook of early childhood intervention (pp. 78–96). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Goodman, L. (1991). Abuse among homeless and housed poor mothers: A comparison study.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61(4), 489–500.
Jacobs, F. H., & Davies, M. W. (1991). Rhetoric or Reality: Child and Family Policy in the United States. Social Policy Report, 5, 4, Society for Research in Child Development, Committee on Child Development and Social Policy, Washington.
Kagan, S., & Shelley, A. (1987). The purpose and problems of family support programs. In S. Kagan, D. Powell, B. Weissbourd, and E. Zigler (Eds).America's family support programs. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Katz, M. (1989).The undeserving poor: From the war on poverty to the war on welfare. New York: Pantheon Books.
Kozol, J. (1988).Rachel and her children: Homeless families in America. New York: Crown Publishers.
Krauss, M., & Jacobs, F. (1990). Family assessment: Purposes and techniques. In S. J. Meisels and J. P. Shonkoff (Eds.),Handbook of early childhood intervention (pp. 303–325). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Little, P. (1990). Local Responses to Homeless Families: A Multiple Site Case Study in Policy Formation. Unpublished masters thesis, Tufts University, Eliot-Pearson Department of Child Study.
Maza, P. L., & Hall, J. A. (1987).Homeless children and their families: A preliminary study. Washington, D.C.: Child Welfare League of America.
Mills, C., & Ota, H. (1989). Homeless women with minor children in the Detroit metropolitan area.Social Work, 485–489.
National Academy of Sciences, Institutes of Medicine: Committee on Health Care for Homeless People (1988).Homelessness, health, and human needs. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
National Commission on Children. (1991).Beyond rhetoric: A new American agenda for children and families. Washington, D.C.: Author.
Phillips, M. H., DeChillo, N., Kronenfeld, D., & Middleton-jeter, V. (1988). Homeless families—Services make a difference.Social Casework — Journal of Contemporary Social Work, 69(1), 48–53.
Rossi, P. H. (1990). The old homeless and the new homelessness in historical perspective.American Psychologist, 45(8), 954–959.
Rossi, P. H., Wright, J. D., Fisher, G. A., & Willis, G. (1987). The urban homeless: Estimating composition and size.Science, 235, 1336–1341.
Shinn, M., Knickman, J. R., Ward, D., Petrovic, N. L., & Muth, B. J. (1990). Alterative models for sheltering homeless families.Journal of Social Issues, 46(4), 175–190.
Shinm, M., Knickman, J. R., & Weitzman, B. C. (1991). Social relationships and vulnerability to becoming homeless among poor families.American Psychologist, 46(11), 1180–1187.
Solarz, A. L. (1988).Homelessness: Implications for children and youth. Social Policy Report, 3, 4. Society for Research in Child Development, Committee on Child Development and Social Policy, Washington.
U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research (1989).A Report on the 1988 National Survey of Shelters for the Homeless. Washington, D.C.: Author.
Walker, D., & Crocker, R. (1988). Measuring family systems outcomes. In H. Weiss and F. Jacobs (Eds.),Evaluating family programs (pp. 153–176). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Waxman, L. D., & Reyes, L. M. (1989).A status report on hunger and homelessness in America's cities: 1988. Washington: U.S. Conference of Mayors.
Weinreb, L., & Bassuk, E. (1990). Substance abuse: A growing problem among homeless families.Family and Community Health, 13(1), 55–64.
Weinreb, L., & Rossi, P. H. (1991). Homeless families: Public policies, program responses, and evaluation strategies.
Weiss, H. (1988). Family support and education programs: Working through ecological theories of human development. In H. Weiss and F. Jacobs (Eds.),Evaluating family programs (pp. 3–36). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Weiss, H., & Hite, S. (1986). National Survey of Family Support and Parent Education Programs: Report to Survey Respondents. Unpublished document, Harvard Family Research Project, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Weiss, H., & Jacobs, F. (1988). Introduction: Family support and education programs — challenges and opportunities. In H. Weiss and F. Jacobs (Eds.),Evaluating family programs (pp. xix-xxix). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Weissbourd, B. (1983). The Family Support Movement: Greater than the Sum of Its Parts. Paper presented at a Conference on Family Support Programs: The State of the Art. Sponsored by the Bush Center on Child Development and Social Policy, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Weitzman, B. C., Knickman, J. R., & Shirm, M. (1990). Pathways to homelessness among New York City families.Journal of Social Issues, 46(4), 125–140.
Whittaker, J., & Garbarino, J. (1983).Social support networks: Informal helping in the human services. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Wood, D., Valdez, B., Hayashi, T., & Shen, A. (1990). Homeless and housed families in Los Angeles: A study comparing demographic, economic, and family function characteristics.American Journal of Public Health, 80(9), 1049–1052.
Wright, J. (1989).Address unknown: The homeless in America. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Zigler, E., & Black, K. B. (1989). America's family support movement.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 59, 6–19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jacobs, F., Little, P.M.D. & Almeida, C. Supporting family life: A survey of homeless shelters. J Soc Distress Homeless 2, 269–288 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065523
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065523