Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling of drug response in individual subjects

  • Published:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pharmacokinetic and drug response data from individual subjects are analyzed empirically by two different mathematical techniques. The drugs involved are the antiarrhythmic agent disopyramide, whose kinetics can be described by a two-compartment model, and two cardiac glycosides, digoxin and β-methyl digoxin, for which three-compartment models are appropriate. The first analytical approach uses multiple linear regression to describe response in terms of the amount of drug in several kinetic compartments. The second approach describes response in terms of the drug concentration in an “effect” compartment. Both approaches describe the data equally well and require the same number of parameters for model specification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. G. Kramer, A. J. Kolibash, R. P. Lewis, M. S. Bathala, J. A. Visconti, and R. H. Reuning. Pharmacokinetics of digoxin: Relationship between response intensity and predicted compartmental drug levels in man.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 7:47–61 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. S. M. Bryson, B. Whiting, and J. R. Lawrence. Disopyramide, serum and pharmacologic effect kinetics applied to the assessment of bioavailability.Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 6:409–419 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. B. Whiting, N. H. G. Holford, and L. B. Sheiner. Quantitative analysis of the disopyramide concentration-effect relationship.Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 9:67–75 (1980).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. P. J. Meffin, R. A. Winkle, and T. F. Blaschke. Response optimization of drug dosage: Antiarrhythmic studies with tocainide.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 22:42–57 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. L. B. Sheiner, D. R. Stanski, S. Vozeh, R. D. Miller, and J. Ham. Simultaneous modelling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: Application tod-tubocurarine.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 25:358–371 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. R. L. Galeazzi, L. Z. Benet, and L. B. Sheiner. Relationship between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of procainamide.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 20:278–289 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. A. W. Kelman, D. J. Sumner, M. Lonsdale, J. R. Lawrence, and B. Whiting. Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cardiac glycosides.Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. (in press).

  8. J. Neter and W. Wasserman.Applied Linear Statistical Models, Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, Ill., 1974, pp. 87–89.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. R. Bevington.Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969, pp. 235, 236.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Akaike, A new look at the statistical model identification.IEEE Tr. Automat. Contr. 19:716–723 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Akaike. An information criterion (AIC)Math. Sci. 14:5–9 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Yamaoka, T. Nakagawa, and T. Uno. Application of Akaike's information criterion (AIC) in the evaluation of linear pharmacokinetic equations.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 6:165–176 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. N. R. Draper and H. Smith.Applied Regression Analysis, J. Wiley, New York, 1966, pp. 86–99.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. J. Sumner, A. J. Russell, and B. Whiting. Digoxin pharmacokinetics: Multicompartmental analysis and its clinical implications.Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 3:221–229 (1976).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. J. L. Cunningham, D. D. Shen, I. Shudo, and D. L. Azarnoff. The effect of nonlinear disposition kinetics on the systemic availability of disopyramide.Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 5:343–346 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. P. J. Meffin, E. W. Robert, R. A. Winkle, S. Harapat, F. A. Peters, and D. C. Harrison. Role of concentration-dependent plasma protein binding in disopyramide disposition.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 1:29–46 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelman, A.W., Whiting, B. Modeling of drug response in individual subjects. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 8, 115–130 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065188

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065188

Key words

Navigation