Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Constructive probability

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Austin, J. L.: 1962,Sense and Sensibilia, Oxford.

  • Dempster, A. P.: 1966, ‘New methods for reasoning towards posterior distributions based on sample data’,Annals of Mathematical Statistics 37, pp. 355–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A. P.: 1968, ‘A generalization of Bayesian inference (with discussion)’,Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 30, pp. 205–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaconis, P.: 1978, ‘Review ofA Mathematical Theory of Evidence’,Journal of the American Statistical Association 73, pp. 677–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, T. L.: 1977, ‘Review ofA Mathematical Theory of Evidence’,Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 83, pp. 667–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Finetti, B.: 1964, ‘Foresight: Its logical laws, its subjective sources’, pp. 93–158 ofStudies in Subjective Probability, Kyburg and Smokler (eds), Wiley.

  • de Finetti, B.: 1972,Probability, Induction, and Statistics, Wiley.

  • de Finetti, B.: 1974,Theory of Probability, Vol. 1, Wiley.

  • de Finetti, B.: 1975,Theory of Probability, Vol. 2, Wiley.

  • Freedman, D. A., and R. A. Purves: 1968, ‘Bayes' methods for bookies’,Annals of Mathematical Statistics 40, pp. 1177–1186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, I. J.: 1962, ‘The measure of a non-measurable set’, pp. 319–329 ofLogic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Nagel, Suppes, and Tarski (eds.), Stanford.

  • Hacking, I.: 1967, ‘Slightly more realistic personal probability’,Philosophy of Science 34, pp. 311–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, P.: 1973, ‘The use of Choquet capacities in statistics’,Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute 45, Book 4, pp. 181–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, P.: 1976, ‘Kapazitäten statt Wahrscheinlichkeiten? Gedanken zur Grundlegung der Statistik’,Jber. Deutsch. Math.-Verein. 78, H.2, pp. 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempthorne, O.: 1975, ‘Inference from experiments and randomization’, inA Survey of Statistical Design and Linear Models, J. N. Srivastava (ed.), North-Holland.

  • Levi, I.: 1981, ‘Dissonance and consistency according to Shackle and Shafer,’ inPSA 1978, Vol. 2, Asqith and Hacking (eds.), Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, D. V.: 1977, ‘Review ofA Mathematical Theory of Evidence’,Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 9, pp. 237–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G.: 1978, ‘Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice’,The Bell Journal of Economics 9, pp. 587–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K.: 1978,The History of Statistics in the 17th and 18th Centuries, Griffin.

  • Seidenfeld, T.: 1981, ‘Statistical evidence and belief functions’, inPSA 1978, Vol. 2, Asquith and Hacking (eds.), Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, G.: 1976,A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton.

  • Shafer, G.: 1978a, ‘Non-additive probabilities in the work of Bernoulli and Lambert’,Archive for History of Exact Sciences 19, pp. 309–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, G.: 1978b, ‘Dempster's rule of combination’, unpublished paper.

  • Shafer, G.: 1981, ‘Two theories of probability’, inPSA 1978, Vol. 2, Asquith and Hacking (eds.), Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, G.: 1979a, ‘Lindley's paradox’, Technical Report No. 125, Department of Statistics, Stanford University.

  • Shafer, G.: 1979b, ‘Allocations of probability’,Annals of Probability 7, pp. 827–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, G., and A. M. Breipohl: 1979, ‘Reliability described by belief functions’, pp. 23–27 ofProceedings of the 1979 Reliability and Maintainability Symposium.

  • Smith, C. A. B.: 1961, ‘Consistency in statistical inference and decision (with discussion)’,Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 23, pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teller, P.: 1973, ‘Conditionalization and observation’,Synthese 26, pp. 218–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. M.: 1975, ‘Coherence, strict coherence and zero probabilities’,Contributed Papers, Fifth International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, VI, 29, 30.

  • Williams, P. M.: 1976, ‘Indeterminate probabilities’, pp. 229–246 ofFormal Methods in the Methodology of Empirical Sciences, M. Przełecki, K. Szaniawski, and R. Wójciki (eds.), Ossolineum and D. Reidel.

  • Williams, P. M.: 1978, ‘On a new theory of epistemic probability’ (Review ofA Mathematical Theory of Evidence),The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29, pp. 375–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, G.: 1977,Obere und Untere Wahrscheinlichkeiten, doctoral dissertation at the Eidgenössischen Technischen Hochschule, Zurich. (Diss. ETH 5884).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Kansas, USA

    Glenn Shafer

Authors
  1. Glenn Shafer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shafer, G. Constructive probability. Synthese 48, 1–60 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064627

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064627

Search

Navigation