Skip to main content
Log in

Science and certainty

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bohm, D.: 1951,Quantum Theory, Prentice-Hall, New York (Dover repr.: 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenas, E., et al.: 1988, ‘Human Basophil Degranulation Triggered by Very Dilute Antiserum against IgE’,Nature 333, 816–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorling, J.: 1973, ‘Demonstrative Induction: Its Significant Role in the History of Science’,Philosophy of Science 40, 360–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorling, J.: unpublished, ‘Einstein's Methodology of Discovery was Newtonian Deduction from the Phenomena’.

  • Duhem, P.: 1962,The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Atheneum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkana, Y.: 1974,The Discovery of the Conservation of Energy, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glymour, C.: 1980,Theory and Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C.: 1965, ‘Studies in the Logic of Confirmation’, inAspects of Scientific Explanation, Free Press, New York, pp. 3–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howson, C. and P. Urbach: 1989,Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach, Open Court, La Salle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S.: 1978,Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. E.: 1964,Logic, Part II, Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I.: 1970, ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Research Programs’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.),Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 91–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, J., J. Randi and W. W. Steward: 1988, ‘“High Dilution” Experiments a Delusion’,Nature 334, 287–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, J.: 1989, ‘Eliminative Induction as a Method of Discovery: How Einstein Discovered General Relativity’, paper prepared for ‘How Theories are Constructed: The Methodology of Scientific Creativity’, Greensboro Philosophy Symposium, 24–26 March 1989, Greensboro, North Carolina.

  • Norton, J.: 1991, ‘Thought Experiments in Einstein's Work’, in T. Horowitz and G. Massey (eds.),Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy, Rowman and Littlefield, Savage, Maryland, pp. 129–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, J.: 1993, ‘The Determination of Theory by Evidence: The Case for Quantum Discontinuity, 1900–1915’,Synthese 97, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peat, F. D.: 1989,Cold Fusion: The Making of a Scientific Controversy, Contemporary Books, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H.: 1912, ‘Sur la théorie des quanta’,Comptes Rendus 153, 1103–08.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.: 1959,The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1953, ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, inFrom a Logical Point of View, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp. 20–46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am grateful to Peter Achinstein, Don Howard, and the other participants at the conference, ‘The Role of Experiments in Scientific Change’, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 30 March to 1 April, 1990, for helpful discussion, and especially to Ron Laymon for his discussion comments presented at the conference on an earlier version of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Norton, J.D. Science and certainty. Synthese 99, 3–22 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064528

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064528

Navigation