Skip to main content
Log in

Demonstrative thought and psychological explanation

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Anscombe, G. E. M.: (1974) ‘Comment on Professor R. L. Gregory's Paper’, inPhilosophy and Psychology, ed. S. Brown, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Jonathan: (1976)Linguistic Behaviour, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, Simon: (1979) ‘Thoughts and Things’, inProc. Artist. Soc. 53.

  • Burge, Tyler: (1977) ‘BeliefDe Re’,Journal of Philosophy 74, 338–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, Tyler: (1979) ‘Sinning against Frege’,Philosophical Review 88, 318–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casteñeda, Hector-Nert: (1968) ‘On the Logic of Attributions of Self-Knowledge to Others’,Journal of Philosophy 55, 439–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald: (1976) ‘Reply to Foster’, inTruth and Meaning, ed. G. Evans and J. McDowell, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel: (1978) ‘Why the Law of Effect Will Not Go Away’, in hisBrainstorms, Bradford, Vermont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel: (forthcoming) ‘Beyond Belief’, inThought and Object, ed. A. Woodfield, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

  • Dummett, Michael: (1973) Frege:Philosophy of Language, Duckworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, Michael: (1975) ‘What is a Theory of Meaning? (I)’, inMind and Language, ed. S. Guttenplan, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Gareth: (forthcoming) ‘Understanding Demonstratives’, inMeaning and Understanding, ed. H. Paret and J. Bouvresse (de Gruyter).

  • Fodor, Jerry: (forthcoming) ‘Methodological Solipsism’, inThe Behavioural and Brain Sciences.

  • Frege, Gottlob: (1977).Logical Investigations, trans. P. Geach, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob: (1979) Posthumous Writings, ed. H. Hermeset al., trans. P. Longet al. (Blackwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, David: (1977)Demonstratives, Draft #2, mimeo, UCLA.

  • Lewis, David: (1979) ‘Attitudes de Dicto and De Se’,Philosophical Review 88, 513–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, Christopher: (1975) ‘Proper Names, Reference and Rigid Designation’, inMeaning, Reference and Necessity, ed. S. Blackburn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, Christopher: (1979)Holistic Explanation, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, Christopher: (forthcoming) ‘Action and the Ascription of Content’.

  • Putnam, Hilary: (1975) ‘The Meaning of ‘Meaning’’, inMinnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. VII, ed. K. Gunderson, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, Stephen: (1978) ‘The Basis of Reference’,Erkenntnis 13, 171–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, Stephen: (1978) ‘Autonomous Psychology and the Belief-Desire Thesis’,The Monist 61, 573–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, George: (1966)Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Larry (1976):Teleological Explanation, University of California Press, Berkeley and California.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am grateful to Martin Davies, Michael Dummett, Gareth Evans, Colin McGinn and David Kaplan for comments and discussion on these issues.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peacocke, C. Demonstrative thought and psychological explanation. Synthese 49, 187–217 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064298

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064298

Keywords

Navigation