Skip to main content
Log in

Market and regulatory forces in the pricing of legal services

  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New data on individual law firms and attorneys is used to examine the effects of professional licensing restrictions and market forces on prices of legal services. The data allow detailed testing of the hypothesis that licensing restrictions serve to increase the price of professional services as well as the incomes of those providing these services. In general, little support is found for this hypothesis. Instead, the estimates show that market forces are most important in explaining variations in prices and attorney incomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel, Richard L. 1989.American Lawyers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, Kenneth J. 1963. “Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care”.American Economic Review 53:941–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Bar Association. 1979.The Lawyer's Almanac. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Bar Association. 1986.The Lawyer's Almanac. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Bar Association. 1986.Review of Legal Education in the United States — Fall 1985. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • BAR/BRI. 1986.Bar/Bri Digest: National Bar Exam Information. Washington D.C.: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary S. 1983. “A Theory of Competition Among Interest Groups for Political Influence”.Quarterly Journal of Economics 98:371–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benham, Lee and Alexandra Benham. 1975. “Regulating Through the Professions: A Perspective on Information Control”.Journal of Law and Economics 18:421–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Henry Campbell. 1983.Black's Law Dictionary (Abridged 5th Edition) St. Paul: West Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boiger, William, Jeffery K. Anderson, and Thomas P. Chiancone. 1988.The Cost of Personal Legal Services: A National Study. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Consumers of Legal Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronars, Stephen and John Lott. 1991. “Do Mandatory Schooling Requirements for Licensing Actually Increase Quality?” manuscript, University of Pennslyvania.

  • Carroll, Sidney L. and Robert J. Gaston. 1981. “Occupational Restrictions and the Quality of Service Received: Some Evidence”.Southern Economic Journal 48:959–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, Robert and Thomas Ulen. 1989.Law and Economics. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Steven R., Allen DeSerpa, and William, C. Canby, Jr. 1982. “Consumer Information and the Pricing of Legal Services”.Journal of Industrial Economics 30:305–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, Barbara. 1985.Lawyer Statistical Report (with Katherine J. Rosich, Clara N. Carson, and Mark C. Puccetti) Chicago: American Bar Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Trade Commission. 1985.Improving Consumer Access to Legal Services: The Case for Removing Restrictions on Truthful Advertising Washington, D.C.: Report of the Staff to the Federal Trade Commission.

  • Freed, Doris and Timothy Walker. 1986. “Family Law in the Fifty States: An Overview”.Family Law Quarterly 19:331–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Richard B. 1975. “Legal ‘Cobwebs’: A Recursive Model of the Market for New Lawyers”.Review of Economics and Statistics 57:171–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Lawrence. 1983.A History of American Law (Second Edition) New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton. 1962. “Occupational Licensure”. inCapitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getz, Malcolm, John Siegfried, and Terry Calvani. 1981. “Competition at the Bar: The Correlation Between the Bar Examination Pass Rate and the Profitability of Practice”Virginia Law Review 67:863–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graddy, Elizabeth. 1991. “Toward a General Theory of Occupational Regulation”.Social Science Quarterly. 72:676–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, William H. 1993.Econometric Analysis. Second Edition. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas-Wilson, Deborah. 1986. “The Effect of Commercial Practice Restrictions: The Case of Optometry”.Journal of Law and Economics 29:165–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halvorsen, Robert, and Raymond Palmquist. 1980. “The Interpretation of Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations”.American Economic Review 70:474–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, Jerry A. 1978. “Specification Tests in Econometrics”.Econometrica 46:1251–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holen, Arlene S. 1965. “Effects of Professional Licensing Arrangements on Interstate Labor Mobility and Resource Allocation”.Journal of Political Economy 73:492–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, Larry R. and Ronald B. Marks. 1980. “Consumer Response to Advertisements for Legal Services: An Empirical Analysis”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 8:357–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leffler, Keith. 1978. “Physician Licensure: Competition and Monopoly in American Medicine”.Journal of Law and Economics 21:165–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leland, Hayne E. 1979. “Quacks, Lemons, and the Market Mechanism: A Theory of Minimum Quality Standards”.Journal of Political Economy 87:1328–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurizi, Alex. 1974. “Occupational Licensing and the Public Interest”Journal of Political Economy 82:399–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Thomas G. 1961. “A Theory of Professional Licensing”.Journal of Law and Economics 4:93–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Kevin M., Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishney. 1991. “The Allocation of Talent: Implications for Growth”.Quarterly Journal of Economics 106:503–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Reed, Dean, Lueck, and Michael Ransom. 1991. “Why Do States Regulate Admission to the Bar?: Economic Theories and Empirical Evidence”George Mason Law Review 14:253–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashigian, B. Peter. 1977. “The Market of Lawyers: The Determinants of the Demand for and the Supply of Lawyers”.Journal of Law and Economics 20:53–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashigian, B. Peter. 1979. Occupational Licensing and the Interstate Mobility of Professionals”.Journal of Law and Economics 21:1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, Sam. 1976. “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation”.Journal of Law and Economics 19:211–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, Richard. 1974. “Theories of Economic Regulation”.Bell Journal of Economics 5:335–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pound, Roscoe. 1953.The Lawyer from Antiquity to Modern Times St. Paul: West Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Sherwin. 1992. “The Market for Lawyers”,Journal of Law and Economics 35:215–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Paul H. and Martin Bailey. 1992. “The Role of Lawyers in Changing the Law,” Working Paper 92-47, Emory University.

  • Sass, Tim R. 1990. “Occupational Licensing and Wage Rates” manuscript, Florida State University.

  • Shepard, Lawrence. 1978. “Licensing Restrictions and the Cost of Dental Care”.Journal of Law and Economics 21:187–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, Robert. 1983.Law School: Legal Education in America from the 1850s to the 1980s. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George J. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation”.Bell Journal of Economics 2:3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1975.Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970 (Bicentennial Edition, Part 2) Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1986.Current Population Survey, March 1986 (machine readable data file, Washington Bureau of the Census) Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1987.Current Population Survey, March 1987 (machine readable data file, Washington Bureau of the Census) Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1988.Current Population Survey, March 1988 (machine readable data file, Washington Bureau of the Census) Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1988.County and City Databook, 1988 Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1990.Statistical Abstract of the United States 1990 (110th Ed.) Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dean Lueck is on leave from Louisiana State University. We thank William Boiger, Executive Director of the National Resource Center for Consumers of Legal Services, for providing data on law firms. Andrew Dick, Philip Hersch, Andy Kleit, Bill Kovacic, Fred McChesney, Jeff Moore, and two anonymous referees provided helpful comments on earlier versions. Chris Diener, Jim Larkins, Robert Pace, and Darrin Timothy provided research assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lueck, D., Olsen, R. & Ransom, M. Market and regulatory forces in the pricing of legal services. J Regul Econ 7, 63–83 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062780

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062780

Keywords

Navigation