Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Molecular biology in the French tradition? Redefining local traditions and disciplinary patterns

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

The first part of this paper has shown that the development of regulatory genetics and the lactose operon model stemmed from laboratory cultures rooted in local traditions. A "physiological" culture may be recognized in the Pasteurian context. The institutional continuity provided the basis for a tenuous link between Pasteur, Lwoff, and Monod. My claim is that the "national" value of regulatory and physiological genetics is an artifact produced in the course of the legitimization process accompanying the institutionalisation of the discipline. In the 1960s, the lactose operon model was turned into a "flag-object," a symbol of the new culture. The work done by the Pasteurian group became therefore the most important, if not the only, exemplar of molecular biology in France.

The second part o f the paper described the origins of general patterns that dominated the building of molecular biology in France. The study of the relationships between molecular biologists and biochemists or immunologists revealed the existence of alternatives to the development of operon research, or to the convergence with molecular biology. Both examples uncover specific paths leading to achievements that might be viewed as international trends: the expansion of RNA and translation studies, and the development of cellular immunology. They illustrate two possible patterns of linking local settings and disciplinary traditions: an oligopolistic situation where a few groups or one institution dominate an entire field, and the emergence of "collective" trends through collaboration networks or schools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abir-am, P. G. 1983. “The Biotheoretical Gathering in England and the origins of molecular biology, 1932–38.” Ph.D. diss., Université de Montréal.

  • Abir-am, P. G. 1993. “The Politics of Macromolecules: Molecular Biology, Biochemists and the Biomolecular Revolution.”Osiris, Second Series, 7, pp. 164–199.

  • Amsterdamska, O. 1987. “Biological and Medical Constraints: Early Research on Variation in Bacteriology.”Soc. Stud. Sci., 17: 657–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, T. D. 1990.The Emergence of Bacterial Genetics., Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buican, D. 1984.Histoire de la génétique et de l'évolutionisme en France. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burian, R., and J. Gayon. 1991. “Un évolutioniste bernardien à l'Institute Pasteur? Morphologie des ciliés et évolution physiologique dans l'oeuvre d'André Lwoff.“ InL'Institut Pasteur, ed. M. Morange, pp. 165–186. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burian, R., J. Gayon, and D. Zallen. 1988. “The Singular Fate of Genetics in the History of French biology, 1900–1940,”J. Hist. Biol., 21: 357–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debru, C. 1983.L'esprit des protéines. Paris: Herman.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1992. “Les travaux de R. Wurmser sur la photosynthèse.” Presented at the Dijon colloquium, Les sciences biologiques et médicales en France, 1920–1950.

  • Englesberg, E. 1961. “Enzymatic Characterization of 17 Arabinose Mutants ofE. coli”J. Bacter. 81: 996–998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantini, B. 1988.J. Monod: Pour une éthique de la connaissance. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fougereau, M. 1975.Éléments d'immonologie fondamentale. Paris: Masson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galperin, C. 1987. “Le bactériophage, la lysogénie et son déterminisme génétique.”Hist. Phil. Life Sci. 9: 175–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudillière, J. P. 1990. “Chimie biologique ou biologie moléculaire: La biochimie au CNRS dans les années soixante.”Cah. Hist. CNRS, 7: 91–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1991a. “Biologie moléculaire et biologistes dans les années soixante. La naissance d'une discipline. Le cas français.” Thèse Université Paris VII.

  • — 1991b. “Catalyse enzymatique et oxydations cellulaires. L'oeuvre de G. Bertrand et la biochimie française dans l'entre-deux-guerres.” InL'Institut Pasteur: Contributions à son histoire, ed. M. Morange, pp. 118–136. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1992a. “J. Monod, S. Spiegelman et l'adaptation enzymatique: Programmes de recherche, cultures locales et traditions disciplinaires.”Hist. Phil. Life Sci., 14: pp. 29–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1992b. “Entre le laboratoire et l'hôpital: Biochimistes et biomédecine dans L'après-guerre Sciences Sociales et Santé, 10: pp. 107–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayon, J. 1992. “B. Ephrussi et le contrôle génétique de la pigmentation de l'oeil de Drosophile.”" Presented at the Dijon colloquium, Les sciences biologiqueset médicales en France, 1920–1950.

  • Grmek, M., and B. Fantini. 1982. “Le rôle du hasard dans la naissance du modèle de l'opéron.”Rev. Hist. Sci., 35: 193–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J., and E. Englesberg. 1959. “Determination of the Order of Mutational Sites Governing Arabinose Utilisation inE. coli B/r by Transduction with Phage P1bt.”Virology, 9: 314–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellig, R. H., and R. Weinberg. 1963. “Complementation Studies of Arabinose Genes inE. coli.”Genetics, 48: 1397–1419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judson, H. F. 1979.The Eighth Day of Creation: Makers of the Revolution in Biology. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, L. 1985. “Conceptual Models and Analytical Tools: The Biology of Physicist Max Delbrück.”J. Hist. Biol., 18: 207–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, R. E. 1982.From Medical Chemistry to Biochemistry: The Making of a Biomedical Discipline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1991. “Systems of Production: Drosophila, Neurospora, and Biochemical Genetics.”Hist. Stud. Phys. Biol. Sci., 21: 87–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowy, I. 1991. “The Immunological Construction of the Self.” InOrganism and the Origins of Self, ed A. I. Tauber, pp. 43–75. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Sciences, no. 129. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar, P. H., ed. 1989.Immunology, 1930–1980: Essays on the History of Immunology. Toronto: Wall and Thompson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monod, J. 1945. “Sur la nature de phénomène de diauxie.”Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 71: 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1947. “The Phenomenon of Enzymatic Adaptation: Its Bearings on Problems of Genetics and Cellular Differentiation.”Growth, 2: 223–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1958. “An Outline of Enzyme Induction.”Recueil Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas, 77: 568–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1965. “Pourquoi la France est scientifiquement sous-développée.” Interview,Nouvel Observateur, October 20.

  • Monod, J., and M. Cohn. 1952. “La biosynthèse induite des enzymes.”Adv. Enzymol.,13: 67-pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1953. “Sur le mécanisme de synthèse d'une protéine bactérienne.” Paper read at 6th International Congress of Microbiology, Rome.

  • Moulin, A. M. 1990. “Histoire d'une science non historique: L'immunologie au CNRS.”Cah. Hist. CNRS, 7: 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1991.Le dernier langage de la médecine: Histoire de l'immunologie de Pasteur au Sida. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappenheimer, A. M. 1980. “Qu'est devenu Pz?” InLes origines de la biologie moléculaire: Un hommage à J. Monod, ed. A. Lwoff and A. Ullmann, pp. 55–60. Montreal: Études Vivantes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, J. F. 1990.La République des savants: La Recherche française et le CNRS. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1992. “Poussée scientifique ou demande de médecins? L'organisation de la recherche médicale en France de l'Institut National d'Hygiène à l'INSERM.”Sciences Sociales et Santé, 10: pp. 47–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanco, X. 1990. “La mise en place d'un reseau scientifique: Les rôles du CNRS et de la DGRST dans l'institutionalisation de la biologie moléculaire en France.”Cah. Hist. CNRS 7: 55–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainger, R., Benson, K. R., and Maienschein, J., eds. 1988.The American Development of Biology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberger, H.-J. 1993. “Experiment and orientation: Early Systems ofin Vitro Protein Synthesis.”J. Hist. Biol., this issue.

  • Sapp. J. 1987.Beyond the Gene: Cytoplasmic Inheritance and the Struggle for Authority in Genetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, K. F. 1974. “Logic of Discovery and Justification in Regulatory Genetics.”Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci., 4: 349–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zallen, D. 1991a. “Louis Rapkine and the Restoration of French Science after the Second World War.”French Hist. Stud., 17: 6–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1991b. “The Rockefeller Foundation and Spectroscopy Research: The Programs at Chicago and Utrecht.”J. Hist. Biol., 25: 67–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. INSERM U158, 75743, 149 rue de Sèvres

    Jean-Paul Gaudillière

Authors
  1. Jean-Paul Gaudillière
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gaudillière, JP. Molecular biology in the French tradition? Redefining local traditions and disciplinary patterns. J Hist Biol 26, 473–498 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062058

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062058

Keywords

Search

Navigation