Skip to main content
Log in

Sample size determination for bioequivalence assessment using a multiplicative model

  • Short Communication
  • Pharmacometrics
  • Published:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In bioequivalence studies C max and AUCserve as the primary pharmacokinetic characteristics of rate and extent of absorption. Based on pharmacokinetic relationships and on empirical evidence, the distribution of these characteristics corresponds to a multiplicative model, which implies a logarithmic normal distribution in the case of a parametric analysis. Hence, consideration is given to exact and approximate formulas of sample sizes in the case of a multiplicative model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. D. J. Schuirmann. A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the bioequivalence of average bioavailability.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 15:657–680 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. K. F. Phillips. Power of the two one-sided tests procedure in bioequivalence.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 18:137–144 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. D. B. Owen. A special case of a bivariate non-central t-distribution.Biometrika 52:437–446 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. P. Liu and S. C. Chow. Sample size determination for the two one-sided tests procedure in bioequivalence.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 20:101–104 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. CPMP Working Party on the Efficacy of Medicinal Products.Note for Guidance: Investigation of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. P. Liu and C. S. Weng. Estimation of direct formulation effect under log-normal distribution in bioavailability/bioequivalence studies.Statist. Med. 11:881–896 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Diletti, D. Hauschke, and V. W. Steinijans. Sample size determination for bioequivalence assessment by means of confidence intervals.Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. Toxicol. 29:1–8 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Food and Drug Administration. Hearing of the Generic Drugs Advisory Committee conducted by the FDA, 26–27 September, 1991. (Audio transcripts by C.A.S.E.T. Associates, Virginia 22030, 1992).

  9. V. W. Steinijans, D. Hauschke, and J. H. G. Jonkman. Controversies in bioequivalence studies.Clin. Pharmacokin. 22:247–253 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. W. W. Hauck and S. Anderson. Types of bioequivalence and related statistical considerations.Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. Toxicol. 30:181–187 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hauschke, D., Steinijans, V.W., Diletti, E. et al. Sample size determination for bioequivalence assessment using a multiplicative model. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 20, 557–561 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061471

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061471

Key words

Navigation