Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacodynamic modeling of thiopental anesthesia

  • Published:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have pharmacodynamically modeled the relationship between the thiopental serum concentration and its effects on the electroencephalogram (EEG). Power spectral analysis was used to calculate the spectral edge, a measure of the underlying EEG frequency that characterizes the progressive slowing of the EEG induced by thiopental. Eight male volunteer subjects had venous thiopental serum concentrations measured, and 10 surgical patients had arterial serum concentrations measured. Thiopental was infused at a rate of 75 to 150 mg/min until a burst suppression EEG pattern was evident. Frequent blood samples were obtained during and after the infusion for measurement of serum thiopental concentrations, and the EEG was recorded for subsequent off-line power spectral analysis to calculate the spectral edge. With venous blood sampling, it was not possible to demonstrate significant hysteresis between the thiopental serum concentration and the spectral edge, allowing thiopental concentrations to be directly related to the spectral edge. With arterial blood sampling, significant hysteresis was present, requiring an effect compartment to relate concentration to effect. The half-time for equilibration (mean ± SD) between concentration and response for the arterial data was 1.2± 0.30min. This value for Keo is consistent with known values for cerebral blood flow and thiopental brain: blood partition coefficient. Arterialvenous concentration differences cause the apparent lack of hysteresis with venous blood sampling. An inhibitory sigmoid E max pharmacodynamic model optimally characterized the relationship between thiopental concentrations and the spectral edge. This model allows estimation of the thiopental serum concentration that causes one-half of the maximal EEG slowing (IC50), which is a measure of an individual's sensitivity to thiopental. Except for the hysteresis, there was no statistical difference in the parameters of the inhibitory sigmoid E max pharmacodynamic model when venous and arterial blood samplings were compared. Arterial blood sampling offers some distinct advantages when pharmacodynamically modeling continuous, rapidly changing measures of drug effect, such as the EEG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. H. G. Holford and L. B. Sheiner. Kinetics of pharmacologie response.Pharmac. Ther. 16:143–166 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. N. H. G. Holford, P. E. Coats, T. W. Guentert, S. Riegelman, and L. B. Sheiner. The effect of quinidine and its metabolite on the electrocardiogram and systolic intervals: Concentration-effect relationships.Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 11:187–195 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. B. Whiting, A. W. Kelman, J. Barclay, and G. J. Addis. Modelling theophylline response in individual patients with chronic bronchitis.Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 12:481–487 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. D. R. Stanski, J. Ham, R. D. Miller, and L. B. Sheiner. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacody-namics of d-tubocurarine during nitrous oxide-narcotic and halothane anesthesia in man.Anesthesiology 51:235–241 (1979).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. A. L. Quasha, E. I. Eger, II, and J. H. Tinker. Determination and applications of MAC.Anesthesiology 53:315–334 (1980).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. R. D. Waud. On biological assays involving quantal responses.J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 183:577–607 (1972).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. L. E. Mather, T. L. Seow, J. G. Roberts, G. K. Gourlay, and M. J. Cousins. Development of a model for integrated phamacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies of intravenous anesthetic agents: Application to minaxolone.Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 19:371–381 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. R. J. Hudson, D. R. Stanski, L. J. Saidman, and E. Meathe. A model to study the depth of thiopental anesthesia and acute tolerance.Anesthesiology 59:301–308 (1983).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. P. K. Kiersey, R. G. Bickford, and A. Faulconer. Electroencephalographic patterns produced by thiopental sodium during surgical operations.Br. J. Anaesth. 23:141–152 (1951).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. W. J. Levy, H. M. Shapiro, G. Maruchak, and E. Meathe. Automated EEG processing for intraoperative monitoring: A comparison of techniques.Anesthesiology 53:223–236 (1980).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. D. R. Stanski, P. G. Burch, S. Harapat, and R. K. Richards. The pharmacokinetics and anesthetic potency of a thiopental contaminant isomer.J. Pharm. Sci. 72:937–940 (1983).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. I. J. Rampil, F. J. Sasse, N. T. Smith, B. H. Holf, and D. C. Fleming. Spectral edge frequency—A new correlate of anesthetic depth.Anesthesiology 53:S12 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R. L. Galeazzi, L. Z. Benet, and L. B. Sheiner. Relationship between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of procainamide.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 20:278–289 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. A. L. Nichols and C. L. Peck. LSNLR—General weighted least squares nonlinear regression program. Technical Report No. 5. Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Uniformed Services University for the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md. (May 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. B. Sheiner, D. R. Stanski, S. Vozeh, R. D. Miller, and J. Ham. Simultaneous modelling netics and pharmacodynamics: Application to d-tubocurarine.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 25:358–371 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. D. L. Clark and B. S. Rosner. Neurophysiological effects of general anesthetics. I. The electroencephalogram and sensory evoked response in man.Anesthesiology 38:564–582 (1973).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. H. L. Price, P. J. Kounat, J. N. Safer, E. H. Conner, and M. L. Price. The uptake of thiopental by body tissues and its relation to the duration of narcosis.Clin. Pharmacol Ther. 1:16–22 (1960).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. H. L. Price, J. W. Dundee, and E. Conner. Rates of uptake and release of thiopental by human brain: Relation to kinetics of thiopental anesthesia.Anesthesiology 18:171 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by NIH Grant R23-GM28032, NIA Grant P01-AG03104, the Veterans Administration Research Service, and the Anesthesiology/Pharmacology Research Foundation of Palo Alto, California. Dr. Hudson was supported by the Medical Research Council of Canada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stanski, D.R., Hudson, R.J., Homer, T.D. et al. Pharmacodynamic modeling of thiopental anesthesia. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 12, 223–240 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059279

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059279

Key words

Navigation