Skip to main content
Log in

Grain boundary segregation of copper, tin and antimony in C-Mn steels at 900°C

  • Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The segregation of copper, tin and antimony to austenite grain boundaries at 900° C has been investigated in C-Mn steels using a scanning Auger microprobe (SAM). The specimens for microanalysis were prepared in a manner such that the prior austenite grain boundaries could be exposed by fracturing at room temperature in the UHV chamber of the SAM unit. Initial bulk concentrations ranged between 600 and 2600 ppm Cu, 50 and 360 ppm Sn and 8 and 35 ppm Sb. Significant enrichment of copper, tin and antimony was detected along the austenite grain boundaries. The grain boundary concentration of copper and tin was found to vary depending upon the initial bulk concentration while the average concentration of antimony at the grain boundaries was found to be approximately 1 at % for all of the heats studied. For heats in which a significant level of copper segregation was detected, a relationship of at % Cu = at % (Sn+Sb) at the austenite grain boundaries was observed. Deformation at 900° C prior to fracture in UHV was found to be necessary to promote segregation. Samples that were annealed at 900° C but not hot worked did not exhibit evidence of copper, tin or antimony segregation. These results have been interpreted in terms of the effects of deformation on segregation kinetics, and were correlated with hot ductility measurements made at 900° C.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. L. Briant andS. K. Banerji,Int. Met. Rev. 23 (1978) 164.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Harris andL. Barnard, ISI Publication 108, (Iron and Steel Institute, London, 1968) 167.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Kiessling,Met. Sci. 14 (1980) 161.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. A. Restaino andC. J. Mcmahon Jr,Trans. ASM 60 (1967) 699.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. V. Ramasubramanian andD. F. Stein,Met. Trans. 4 (1973) 1735.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. L. Smith andJ. R. Low Jr,ibid. 5 (1974) 279.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. E. Davis, N. C. Macdonald, P. W. Palberg.G. E. Riach andR. E. Weber, “Handbook of Auger Electron Spectroscopy,” Second Edition, (Physical Electronics Industries, Inc., Eden Prairie, MN, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Wood, D. B. Williams andJ. I. Goldstein, “Quantitative Microanalysis with High Spatial Resolution”, Book No. 277 (The Metals Society, London, 1981) pp. 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. T. Nachtrab, PhD Dissertation, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. R. Michael, MSc Thesis, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Doig andP. E. J. Flewitt,Met. Trans. 13A (1982) 1397.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Bastien andP. Azou,C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 232 (1951) 1845.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Idem, Proceedings of the 1st World Metallurgical Congress (ASM Publ., Cleveland, Ohio, 1951) p. 535.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. K. Tien, A. W. Thompson, I. M. Bernstein andR. J. Richards,Met. Trans. 7A (1976) 821.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Bardeen andC. Herring, in “Atom Movements” (ASM, Cleveland, Ohio, 1951) p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. A. Hendrickson andE. S. Machlin,Trans. AIME 200 (1954) 1035.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Cohen,Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 11 (1970) 145.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. H. Cottrell andB. A. Bilby,Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) A62 (1949) 49.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. W. Cochardt, G. Schoeck andH. Wiedersich,Acta Metall. 3 (1955) 533.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. C. M. Li andY. T. Chou,Trans. TMS-AIME 245 (1969) 1606.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. P. Hirth andJ. Lothe, “Theory of Dislocations,” (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. A. Melford,J. Iron Steel Inst. 200 (1962) 290.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Idem, ibid. 204 (1966) 495.

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. Guttmann,Surf. Sci. 53 (1975) 213.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Idem, Met. Sci. 10 (1976) 337.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nachtrab, W.T., Chou, Y.T. Grain boundary segregation of copper, tin and antimony in C-Mn steels at 900°C. J Mater Sci 19, 2136–2144 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01058089

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01058089

Keywords

Navigation